Cloud · head to head
CapRover vs Chainguard

CapRover
Cloud
Free self-hosted platform built on Docker Swarm with a dashboard and automatic certificates
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CapRover since June 2026 one pseudonymous account wrote 97 of roughly 100 commits and the next human contributor wrote one, so there is no identifiable person or company to contract with, escalate to or hold responsible.; Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- They diverge on capability: CapRover covers One-click applications, Chainguard covers Hardened container images.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CapRover and Chainguard actually diverge.
| Attribute | CapRover | Chainguard |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Licensing by artifact type and team size |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted | Cloud, Container, VM |
| Category | Cloud | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CapRover
- One-click applications
- Automatic certificates
- Web dashboard
- Multiple deploy paths
- Docker Swarm clustering
- Custom nginx configuration
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CapRover
- Running a personal server or homelab with several applications behind automatic certificatesnot Chainguard
- A two person team that wants a dashboard rather than a terminal for deployments on one boxnot Chainguard
- Standing up one-click databases and internal tools without writing Compose filesnot Chainguard
- Hosting client demos cheaply where downtime is inconvenient rather than expensivenot Chainguard
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot CapRover
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot CapRover
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot CapRover
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot CapRover
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot CapRover
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CapRover
- Since June 2026 one pseudonymous account wrote 97 of roughly 100 commits and the next human contributor wrote one, so there is no identifiable person or company to contract with, escalate to or hold responsible.
- Donations over the last twelve months totalled 285 US dollars and there is no commercial tier, so no paid support exists at any price and no maintenance commitment is funded.
- The LICENSE file is Apache 2.0 with a superseding appendix that bans redistributing a paid version and refers to paid features that do not yet exist, and GitHub cannot classify it, so the terms already anticipate a commercial change of direction.
- Releases arrive in bursts with an eleven month gap between September 2023 and August 2024 and two further gaps of about six months since, so there is no basis for assuming a security fix will land promptly.
- The backup feature is documented as experimental, covers only the CapRover configuration directory and explicitly excludes persistent volumes and container images, so every database has to be dumped separately with its container stopped.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
Pricing, plan by plan
CapRover
Free- CapRoverFree
- No paid tier and no hosted offering
- Unlimited applications, servers and users
- Community support through Slack and GitHub
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
Which should you pick?
Choose CapRover if
- You need one-click applications.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted.
- You also want automatic certificates.
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Questions people ask
- Is CapRover or Chainguard better?
- Neither clearly leads. CapRover starts at Free and Chainguard at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CapRover or Chainguard?
- CapRover starts at Free and Chainguard at Free.
- Does CapRover or Chainguard run on more platforms?
- CapRover runs on Web, Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted. Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM.
- Can I use CapRover for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CapRover best used for?
- CapRover is most often used for running a personal server or homelab with several applications behind automatic certificates, a two person team that wants a dashboard rather than a terminal for deployments on one box, standing up one-click databases and internal tools without writing compose files, hosting client demos cheaply where downtime is inconvenient rather than expensive. Of those, running a personal server or homelab with several applications behind automatic certificates and a two person team that wants a dashboard rather than a terminal for deployments on one box are not what Chainguard is typically brought in for.
- What can CapRover do that Chainguard cannot?
- CapRover covers One-click applications, Automatic certificates, Web dashboard, Multiple deploy paths. Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CapRover: Does CapRover cost anything?
No. There is no paid tier and no hosted version. The only income is donations, which came to 285 US dollars over the last twelve months.
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourceCapRover: Is the licence really Apache 2.0?
Not quite. The LICENSE file is Apache 2.0 plus an appendix that supersedes it in case of conflict, forbidding modification of paid features and redistribution of a paid version. GitHub does not recognise the result as a standard licence.
Chainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourceCapRover: Does the backup feature protect my databases?
No. It backs up the CapRover configuration directory only and explicitly excludes persistent directories and container images. You have to dump each database yourself with the container stopped.
Chainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourceCapRover: Can I move off Docker Swarm later?
Not without rebuilding. CapRover is architecturally tied to Swarm, so outgrowing it means migrating applications to a different platform rather than switching a scheduler.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CapRover vs Render
- CapRover vs K3s
- CapRover vs DigitalOcean
- CapRover vs Coolify
- CapRover vs Dokku
- CapRover vs Qovery
- CapRover vs Porter
- CapRover vs Railway
- CapRover vs Fly.io
- CapRover vs Northflank
- CapRover vs SST
- CapRover vs Heroku
- CapRover vs Jaeger
- CapRover vs Lambda
- CapRover vs Linode
- CapRover vs Longhorn
- CapRover vs minikube
- CapRover vs Snyk
- CapRover vs Trivy
- CapRover vs Doppler
- CapRover vs Infisical
- CapRover vs Grype
- CapRover vs Arnica
- CapRover vs HashiCorp Vault
- CapRover vs Bitwarden
- CapRover vs Semgrep
- CapRover vs Authelia
- CapRover vs Endor Labs
- CapRover vs Tenable
- CapRover vs Hanwha Vision
- CapRover vs Idira
- CapRover vs IVPN
- CapRover vs Logto
- CapRover vs Malwarebytes
- CapRover vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs Render
- Chainguard vs K3s
- Chainguard vs DigitalOcean
- Chainguard vs Coolify
- Chainguard vs Dokku
- Chainguard vs Qovery
- Chainguard vs Porter
- Chainguard vs Railway
- Chainguard vs Fly.io
- Chainguard vs Northflank
- Chainguard vs SST
- Chainguard vs Heroku
- Chainguard vs Jaeger
- Chainguard vs Lambda
- Chainguard vs Linode
- Chainguard vs Longhorn
- Chainguard vs minikube
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
