Agriculture · head to head
Case IH AFS Connect vs Proagrica

Case IH AFS Connect
Agriculture
Telematics and farm data platform for Case IH machinery, now delivered as FieldOps
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Proagrica
Agriculture
Data integration for agriculture supply chains
- From
- $29/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Case IH AFS Connect coverage of non-Case IH machinery is thin, so a mixed-colour fleet ends up running two portals and reconciling the data by hand or through a third-party platform.; Proagrica proagrica's own domain (proagrica.com) now redirects through telusagriculture.com to telus.com/agriculture, and the destination site confirms the product line now operates under TELUS Agriculture branding rather than as an independent Proagrica product.
- They diverge on capability: Case IH AFS Connect covers Machine telemetry, Proagrica covers EDI integration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Case IH AFS Connect and Proagrica actually diverge.
| Attribute | Case IH AFS Connect | Proagrica |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $29/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 1998 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Agriculture).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Case IH AFS Connect
- Machine telemetry
- Remote display view
- Two-way file transfer
- Yield and coverage mapping
- Fleet dashboards
- Data sharing and APIs
- FieldOps mobile app
Only in Proagrica
- EDI integration
- Product data management
- E-commerce platforms
- Order management
- Market analytics
- SAP
- Oracle
- Major retailers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Case IH AFS Connect
- A row-crop operation running a Case IH Magnum and Axial-Flow fleet that wants as-applied and yield data off the machines without USB sticksnot Proagrica
- A farm manager who needs to talk an inexperienced operator through a display setting during harvest without driving to the fieldnot Proagrica
- A dealer service department diagnosing an alert remotely before deciding whether to dispatch a techniciannot Proagrica
- An operation buying new Case IH iron after October 2024 that wants connected features without an annual telematics renewalnot Proagrica
Proagrica
- Data integrationnot Case IH AFS Connect
- E-commercenot Case IH AFS Connect
- Supply chainnot Case IH AFS Connect
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Case IH AFS Connect
- Coverage of non-Case IH machinery is thin, so a mixed-colour fleet ends up running two portals and reconciling the data by hand or through a third-party platform.
- The agronomic side is weaker than software-first platforms: field records, input tracking and compliance reporting are shallower than Agworld or Conservis and most serious growers export to something else.
- The entry cost is hardware, not software; a Pro 1200 display and receiver retrofit runs into five figures per machine, which is the real barrier for anyone hoping to add the platform to an older tractor.
- Connectivity Included only applies to qualifying machines from October 2024 onward, so a farm with a five-year-old fleet still faces a per-machine dealer activation fee and older modems may not be eligible at all.
- Dealer dependency is total: activations, subscription changes and most troubleshooting route through the dealer rather than a self-service portal, which makes response times a function of your local dealership rather than CNH.
Proagrica
- Proagrica's own domain (proagrica.com) now redirects through telusagriculture.com to telus.com/agriculture, and the destination site confirms the product line now operates under TELUS Agriculture branding rather than as an independent Proagrica product.
Pricing, plan by plan
Case IH AFS Connect
On request- AFS Connect / FieldOps$undefined/year
- Included with qualifying machines built and purchased after 1 October 2024
- One-time dealer activation fee for older machines with a compatible modem
- Display and receiver hardware quoted separately by the dealer
Proagrica
$29/month- StandardFree
- Custom pricing
- Data integration
- Basic analytics
- EnterpriseFree
- Custom pricing
- Full suite
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Case IH AFS Connect if
- You need machine telemetry.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want remote display view.
Choose Proagrica if
- You need edi integration.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want product data management.
Questions people ask
- Is Case IH AFS Connect or Proagrica better?
- Neither clearly leads. Case IH AFS Connect starts at On request and Proagrica at $29/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Case IH AFS Connect or Proagrica?
- Case IH AFS Connect starts at On request and Proagrica at $29/month.
- Does Case IH AFS Connect or Proagrica run on more platforms?
- Case IH AFS Connect runs on Web, iOS, Android. Proagrica runs on Web, Api.
- What is Case IH AFS Connect best used for?
- Case IH AFS Connect is most often used for a row-crop operation running a case ih magnum and axial-flow fleet that wants as-applied and yield data off the machines without usb sticks, a farm manager who needs to talk an inexperienced operator through a display setting during harvest without driving to the field, a dealer service department diagnosing an alert remotely before deciding whether to dispatch a technician, an operation buying new case ih iron after october 2024 that wants connected features without an annual telematics renewal. Of those, a row-crop operation running a case ih magnum and axial-flow fleet that wants as-applied and yield data off the machines without usb sticks and a farm manager who needs to talk an inexperienced operator through a display setting during harvest without driving to the field are not what Proagrica is typically brought in for.
- What can Case IH AFS Connect do that Proagrica cannot?
- Case IH AFS Connect covers Machine telemetry, Remote display view, Two-way file transfer, Yield and coverage mapping. Proagrica covers EDI integration, Product data management, E-commerce platforms, Order management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Case IH AFS Connect: Is AFS Connect the same thing as FieldOps?
FieldOps is the rebuilt CNH portal and app that AFS Connect accounts have been migrating into. The underlying machine connectivity is the same; the branding and interface changed.
Case IH AFS Connect: Do I still pay an annual subscription?
Not on qualifying machines built and purchased from 1 October 2024, where connectivity is included. Older machines with a compatible modem can be activated through a dealer for a one-time fee.
Case IH AFS Connect: Can I use it with John Deere or New Holland machines in the same fleet?
Not natively in any useful way. New Holland shares CNH infrastructure but sits in its own portal, and Deere data has to come in through API sharing or a third-party farm management platform.
Case IH AFS Connect: What does it cost to add to a used tractor?
The subscription may be cheap or free, but the display, receiver and modem retrofit are the cost, and those are quoted per machine by the dealer into five figures.
Related pages
More on Case IH AFS Connect
Other head to heads
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Trimble Ag Software
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Conservis
- Case IH AFS Connect vs John Deere Operations Center
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Granular
- Case IH AFS Connect vs FarmLogs
- Case IH AFS Connect vs MyJohnDeere
- Case IH AFS Connect vs CeresAI
- Case IH AFS Connect vs fieldmargin
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Tend
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Teralytic
- Case IH AFS Connect vs CropX
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Farmers Edge
- Case IH AFS Connect vs FarmWorks
- Case IH AFS Connect vs FieldView Plus
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Gallagher eShepherd
- Case IH AFS Connect vs GAMAYA
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Bushel
- Case IH AFS Connect vs AgriSync
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Traction
- Case IH AFS Connect vs DTN Agriculture
- Case IH AFS Connect vs DJI Agriculture
- Case IH AFS Connect vs PrecisionHawk
- Case IH AFS Connect vs DroneDeploy
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Farmbrite
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Case IH AFS Connect vs 365FarmNet
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Ag-Analytics
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Ag Leader
- Case IH AFS Connect vs AgCode
- Case IH AFS Connect vs AgriWater
- Case IH AFS Connect vs Agronomic
- Proagrica vs Trimble Ag Software
- Proagrica vs Conservis
- Proagrica vs John Deere Operations Center
- Proagrica vs Granular
- Proagrica vs FarmLogs
- Proagrica vs MyJohnDeere
- Proagrica vs CeresAI
- Proagrica vs fieldmargin
- Proagrica vs Lindsay FieldNET
- Proagrica vs Tend
- Proagrica vs Teralytic
- Proagrica vs CropX
- Proagrica vs Farmers Edge
- Proagrica vs FarmWorks
- Proagrica vs FieldView Plus
- Proagrica vs Gallagher eShepherd
- Proagrica vs GAMAYA
- Proagrica vs Bushel
- Proagrica vs AgriSync
- Proagrica vs Traction
- Proagrica vs DTN Agriculture
- Proagrica vs DJI Agriculture
- Proagrica vs PrecisionHawk
- Proagrica vs DroneDeploy
- Proagrica vs Farmbrite
- Proagrica vs Davis Instruments WeatherLink
- Proagrica vs 365FarmNet
- Proagrica vs Ag-Analytics
- Proagrica vs Ag Leader
- Proagrica vs AgCode
- Proagrica vs AgriWater
- Proagrica vs Agronomic
