Softwr

Mining & Resources · head to head

Carlson Mining vs MineSched

Carlson Mining logo

Carlson Mining

Mining & Resources

Mining and surveying software solution

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
MineSched logo

MineSched

Mining & Resources

Production scheduling software for mining operations

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • They diverge on capability: Carlson Mining covers Pit design, MineSched covers Production scheduling.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Carlson Mining and MineSched actually diverge.

Attributes where Carlson Mining and MineSched differ
AttributeCarlson MiningMineSched
Founded19831981

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Windows), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Mining & Resources).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Carlson Mining

  • Pit design
  • Grade control
  • Production planning
  • Survey integration
  • Mapping
  • AutoCAD
  • ArcGIS
  • GPS

Only in MineSched

  • Production scheduling
  • Activity sequencing
  • Resource planning
  • Constraint handling
  • Scenario analysis
  • Surpac
  • Whittle
  • PCBC

Both cover

  • Windows support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Carlson Mining

  • Pit designnot MineSched
  • Grade controlnot MineSched
  • Mine planningnot MineSched
  • Surveyingnot MineSched
  • Mappingnot MineSched

MineSched

  • Production planningnot Carlson Mining
  • Resource schedulingnot Carlson Mining
  • Equipment allocationnot Carlson Mining
  • Capacity planningnot Carlson Mining
  • Performance trackingnot Carlson Mining

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Carlson Mining

Nothing recorded yet. See the Carlson Mining review.

MineSched

  • 3ds.com's MineSched page describes the product's scheduling features in detail but publishes no pricing, no named edition or tier, and no figure of any kind

Pricing, plan by plan

Carlson Mining

On request
  • Carlson Mining Standard$7000/year
    • Mining design
    • Pit design
    • Grade control
  • Carlson Mining Professional$15000/year
    • Advanced mine planning
    • Production scheduling
    • Equipment management

MineSched

On request
  • MineSched Standard$12000/year
    • Production scheduling
    • Gantt charts
    • Resource allocation
  • MineSched Advanced$20000/year
    • Multi-scenario planning
    • Optimization tools
    • Advanced constraints

Which should you pick?

Choose Carlson Mining if

  • You need pit design.
  • You work on Windows.
  • You also want grade control.
Carlson Mining review

Choose MineSched if

  • You need production scheduling.
  • You work on Windows.
  • You also want activity sequencing.
MineSched review

Questions people ask

Is Carlson Mining or MineSched better?
Neither clearly leads. Carlson Mining starts at On request and MineSched at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Carlson Mining or MineSched?
Carlson Mining starts at On request and MineSched at On request.
Does Carlson Mining or MineSched run on more platforms?
Both run on Windows, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Carlson Mining best used for?
Carlson Mining is most often used for pit design, grade control, mine planning, surveying. Of those, pit design and grade control are not what MineSched is typically brought in for.
What can Carlson Mining do that MineSched cannot?
Carlson Mining covers Pit design, Grade control, Production planning, Survey integration. MineSched covers Production scheduling, Activity sequencing, Resource planning, Constraint handling. Both handle Windows support.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Carlson Mining

More on MineSched

Keep looking

Other head to heads