Cloud · head to head
CapRover vs Kong Gateway

CapRover
Cloud
Free self-hosted platform built on Docker Swarm with a dashboard and automatic certificates
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Kong Gateway
APIs
Open-source and cloud API gateway for managing microservices traffic
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CapRover since June 2026 one pseudonymous account wrote 97 of roughly 100 commits and the next human contributor wrote one, so there is no identifiable person or company to contract with, escalate to or hold responsible.; Kong Gateway the free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- They diverge on capability: CapRover covers One-click applications, Kong Gateway covers API request routing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CapRover and Kong Gateway actually diverge.
| Attribute | CapRover | Kong Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | freemium |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted | web, linux, api |
| Category | Cloud | APIs |
| Founded | Unknown | 2017 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CapRover
- One-click applications
- Automatic certificates
- Web dashboard
- Multiple deploy paths
- Docker Swarm clustering
- Custom nginx configuration
Only in Kong Gateway
- API request routing
- Plugin ecosystem
- Developer portals
- AI Gateway
- Analytics and observability
- SSO and audit logs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CapRover
- Running a personal server or homelab with several applications behind automatic certificatesnot Kong Gateway
- A two person team that wants a dashboard rather than a terminal for deployments on one boxnot Kong Gateway
- Standing up one-click databases and internal tools without writing Compose filesnot Kong Gateway
- Hosting client demos cheaply where downtime is inconvenient rather than expensivenot Kong Gateway
Kong Gateway
- Routing and securing traffic across microservicesnot CapRover
- Publishing internal or external developer portalsnot CapRover
- Managing rate limits and authentication at the API edgenot CapRover
- Gateway-level routing to multiple LLM providersnot CapRover
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CapRover
- Since June 2026 one pseudonymous account wrote 97 of roughly 100 commits and the next human contributor wrote one, so there is no identifiable person or company to contract with, escalate to or hold responsible.
- Donations over the last twelve months totalled 285 US dollars and there is no commercial tier, so no paid support exists at any price and no maintenance commitment is funded.
- The LICENSE file is Apache 2.0 with a superseding appendix that bans redistributing a paid version and refers to paid features that do not yet exist, and GitHub cannot classify it, so the terms already anticipate a commercial change of direction.
- Releases arrive in bursts with an eleven month gap between September 2023 and August 2024 and two further gaps of about six months since, so there is no basis for assuming a security fix will land promptly.
- The backup feature is documented as experimental, covers only the CapRover configuration directory and explicitly excludes persistent volumes and container images, so every database has to be dumped separately with its container stopped.
Kong Gateway
- The free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- Plus tier caps API requests at 1M/month before incurring per-million overage charges.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and not published, making budgeting harder without sales contact.
- Configuration and plugin management can require significant operational expertise to run at scale.
Pricing, plan by plan
CapRover
Free- CapRoverFree
- No paid tier and no hosted offering
- Unlimited applications, servers and users
- Community support through Slack and GitHub
Kong Gateway
Free- Free TrialFree
- 30-day enterprise functionality trial
- Unlimited gateways
- 30-day analytics retention
- Plus$undefined/month
- Up to 5 serverless, 2 hybrid, 2 dedicated cloud gateways
- 1M API requests/month included
- Up to 2 developer portals
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited hybrid and dedicated cloud gateways
- Unlimited developer portals
- SSO and audit logs
Which should you pick?
Choose CapRover if
- You need one-click applications.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted.
- You also want automatic certificates.
Choose Kong Gateway if
- You need api request routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, api.
- You also want plugin ecosystem.
Questions people ask
- Is CapRover or Kong Gateway better?
- Neither clearly leads. CapRover starts at Free and Kong Gateway at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CapRover or Kong Gateway?
- CapRover starts at Free and Kong Gateway at Free.
- Does CapRover or Kong Gateway run on more platforms?
- CapRover runs on Web, Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted. Kong Gateway runs on web, linux, api.
- Can I use CapRover for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CapRover best used for?
- CapRover is most often used for running a personal server or homelab with several applications behind automatic certificates, a two person team that wants a dashboard rather than a terminal for deployments on one box, standing up one-click databases and internal tools without writing compose files, hosting client demos cheaply where downtime is inconvenient rather than expensive. Of those, running a personal server or homelab with several applications behind automatic certificates and a two person team that wants a dashboard rather than a terminal for deployments on one box are not what Kong Gateway is typically brought in for.
- What can CapRover do that Kong Gateway cannot?
- CapRover covers One-click applications, Automatic certificates, Web dashboard, Multiple deploy paths. Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Plugin ecosystem, Developer portals, AI Gateway.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CapRover: Does CapRover cost anything?
No. There is no paid tier and no hosted version. The only income is donations, which came to 285 US dollars over the last twelve months.
Kong Gateway: Is Kong Gateway free?
Kong's core gateway is open source and free to self-host. Kong Konnect, the managed cloud platform, offers a 30-day free trial before moving to paid Plus or custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceCapRover: Is the licence really Apache 2.0?
Not quite. The LICENSE file is Apache 2.0 plus an appendix that supersedes it in case of conflict, forbidding modification of paid features and redistribution of a paid version. GitHub does not recognise the result as a standard licence.
Kong Gateway: How is usage metered on the Plus plan?
The Plus plan includes 1M API requests per month, with additional usage billed at $200 per extra 1 million requests up to a 10M/month cap, plus per-gateway and per-LLM-model charges.
SourceCapRover: Does the backup feature protect my databases?
No. It backs up the CapRover configuration directory only and explicitly excludes persistent directories and container images. You have to dump each database yourself with the container stopped.
Kong Gateway: What support is included?
Plus includes email support with a 2-business-day SLA, while Enterprise adds dedicated success managers and professional services.
SourceCapRover: Can I move off Docker Swarm later?
Not without rebuilding. CapRover is architecturally tied to Swarm, so outgrowing it means migrating applications to a different platform rather than switching a scheduler.
Related pages
More on Kong Gateway
Other head to heads
- CapRover vs Render
- CapRover vs K3s
- CapRover vs DigitalOcean
- CapRover vs Coolify
- CapRover vs Dokku
- CapRover vs Qovery
- CapRover vs Porter
- CapRover vs Railway
- CapRover vs Fly.io
- CapRover vs Northflank
- CapRover vs SST
- CapRover vs Heroku
- CapRover vs Jaeger
- CapRover vs Lambda
- CapRover vs Linode
- CapRover vs Longhorn
- CapRover vs minikube
- CapRover vs Tyk
- CapRover vs Moesif
- CapRover vs Treblle
- CapRover vs Convoy
- CapRover vs Janus Gateway
- CapRover vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- CapRover vs Gravitee
- CapRover vs Strapi
- CapRover vs WSO2 API Manager
- CapRover vs AWS API Gateway
- CapRover vs GraphQL Apollo
- CapRover vs Appwrite
- CapRover vs Payload CMS
- CapRover vs Portkey
- CapRover vs Prisma
- CapRover vs RapidAPI
- CapRover vs REST Client VSCode
- CapRover vs Rutter
- Kong Gateway vs Render
- Kong Gateway vs K3s
- Kong Gateway vs DigitalOcean
- Kong Gateway vs Coolify
- Kong Gateway vs Dokku
- Kong Gateway vs Qovery
- Kong Gateway vs Porter
- Kong Gateway vs Railway
- Kong Gateway vs Fly.io
- Kong Gateway vs Northflank
- Kong Gateway vs SST
- Kong Gateway vs Heroku
- Kong Gateway vs Jaeger
- Kong Gateway vs Lambda
- Kong Gateway vs Linode
- Kong Gateway vs Longhorn
- Kong Gateway vs minikube
- Kong Gateway vs Tyk
- Kong Gateway vs Moesif
- Kong Gateway vs Treblle
- Kong Gateway vs Convoy
- Kong Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Gravitee
- Kong Gateway vs Strapi
- Kong Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong Gateway vs AWS API Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs GraphQL Apollo
- Kong Gateway vs Appwrite
- Kong Gateway vs Payload CMS
- Kong Gateway vs Portkey
- Kong Gateway vs Prisma
- Kong Gateway vs RapidAPI
- Kong Gateway vs REST Client VSCode
- Kong Gateway vs Rutter
