Developer Tools · head to head
Buildkite vs Transmit Security

Buildkite
Developer Tools
CI/CD pipelines that run on your own compute
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Transmit Security
Cybersecurity
Customer identity platform built around passwordless and fraud signals
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Buildkite has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Buildkite free plan caps at 5 users and 10 concurrent jobs, with 2,000 Linux vCPU minutes per month and 30 day build retention; Transmit Security pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Buildkite and Transmit Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | Buildkite | Transmit Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Buildkite
Nothing recorded that Transmit Security does not also cover.
Only in Transmit Security
- Passwordless authentication
- Detection and response
- Identity verification
- Orchestration
- Account recovery
- Bot and automation detection
- Composable APIs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Buildkite
- CI/CD pipeline automationnot Transmit Security
- Test execution at scalenot Transmit Security
- Deployment automationnot Transmit Security
Transmit Security
- A bank moving a consumer base off passwords to passkeys without losing customers at the migration stepnot Buildkite
- An insurer whose account recovery flow is the main account takeover route and needs risk scoring inside itnot Buildkite
- A retailer that wants bot detection at login rather than only at checkoutnot Buildkite
- An organisation replacing an in-house customer login system that has become an unfunded engineering liabilitynot Buildkite
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Buildkite
- Free plan caps at 5 users and 10 concurrent jobs, with 2,000 Linux vCPU minutes per month and 30 day build retention
- Pro plan is $30 per active user per month, capped at 50 users, with only 10 of the up to 250 concurrent agents included before extra usage
- Enterprise plan enforces a 30 user minimum even though pricing itself is custom
- Hosted compute beyond included minutes is metered at $0.004 per vCPU minute on Linux and $0.02 per vCPU minute on Mac
Transmit Security
- Pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- Migrating a live consumer identity base is a high risk project, and credential migration constraints mean some users must re-register, which shows up as measurable churn.
- The vendor is smaller than the identity incumbents, so the partner and systems integrator pool is thinner and staffing a large programme is harder.
- Workforce identity is not the focus, so an organisation wanting one vendor for employees and customers will still run two platforms.
- The fraud detection value depends on traffic volume feeding the models, so a smaller deployment gets less benefit from exactly the capability that justified choosing it over a plain identity provider.
Pricing, plan by plan
Buildkite
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 users
- 10 concurrent jobs
- 2000 Linux vCPU minutes monthly
- Pro$30/month
- Up to 50 users
- 250 concurrent agents (10 included)
- 4000 Linux vCPU minutes monthly
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited users (30 minimum)
- Custom usage limits
- Full platform access
Transmit Security
On request- Transmit Security Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per monthly active user or per transaction by service
- Services licensed individually or as a platform
- Free developer tier for evaluation
Which should you pick?
Choose Transmit Security if
- You need passwordless authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want detection and response.
Questions people ask
- Is Buildkite or Transmit Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. Buildkite starts at Free and Transmit Security at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Buildkite or Transmit Security?
- Buildkite has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Buildkite and On request for Transmit Security.
- Does Buildkite or Transmit Security run on more platforms?
- Buildkite runs on Web. Transmit Security runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Buildkite for free?
- Yes. Buildkite has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Transmit Security starts at On request.
- What is Buildkite best used for?
- Buildkite is most often used for ci/cd pipeline automation, test execution at scale, deployment automation. Of those, ci/cd pipeline automation and test execution at scale are not what Transmit Security is typically brought in for.
- What can Buildkite do that Transmit Security cannot?
- Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication, Detection and response, Identity verification, Orchestration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Buildkite: Can I use Buildkite without paying?
Yes, Buildkite offers a free plan that includes up to 5 users, 10 concurrent jobs, 2000 Linux vCPU minutes monthly, and 250k test executions per month at no cost.
SourceTransmit Security: Do we have to replace our existing identity provider?
No. The services are composable, so detection and response or verification can be adopted alongside an existing provider such as Okta or Entra ID.
Buildkite: What happens if I exceed my included compute minutes on Buildkite?
Hosted agent compute is charged separately at $0.004 per Linux vCPU minute and $0.02 per Mac vCPU minute, billed to the second with no minimums.
SourceTransmit Security: Is fraud detection an extra licence?
It is a separate service, but it is designed to run inside the authentication flow rather than as a bolted-on second vendor. Confirm which services are in your quote.
Buildkite: Do I need an annual commitment for Buildkite's Pro plan?
No, Buildkite's Pro plan is billed monthly at $30 per active user with no long-term contract required. All tiers include a 30-day all-access trial.
SourceTransmit Security: Is there a way to try it?
Yes, a free developer tier exists for evaluation, though production use is an enterprise agreement.
Buildkite: What user limits apply to each Buildkite plan?
Free plan supports up to 5 users, Pro plan supports up to 50 users, and Enterprise plan provides unlimited users with a 30-user minimum.
SourceRelated pages
More on Transmit Security
Other head to heads
- Buildkite vs Depot
- Buildkite vs Dagger
- Buildkite vs pnpm
- Buildkite vs Turborepo
- Buildkite vs Visual Studio Code
- Buildkite vs ESLint
- Buildkite vs GitLab CI/CD
- Buildkite vs Keycloak
- Buildkite vs Nx Cloud
- Buildkite vs Yarn
- Buildkite vs Atlantis
- Buildkite vs Coder
- Buildkite vs Garden
- Buildkite vs HCP Terraform
- Buildkite vs Helm
- Buildkite vs Jitsu
- Buildkite vs Descope
- Buildkite vs NICE Actimize
- Buildkite vs Beyond Identity
- Buildkite vs Sardine
- Buildkite vs Feedzai
- Buildkite vs Socure
- Buildkite vs Unit21
- Buildkite vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Buildkite vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Buildkite vs Ping Identity
- Buildkite vs Stytch
- Buildkite vs Rhombus Systems
- Buildkite vs Semgrep
- Buildkite vs Spot AI
- Buildkite vs Syft
- Buildkite vs ThetaRay
- Buildkite vs Trivy
- Buildkite vs Trulioo
- Transmit Security vs Depot
- Transmit Security vs Dagger
- Transmit Security vs pnpm
- Transmit Security vs Turborepo
- Transmit Security vs Visual Studio Code
- Transmit Security vs ESLint
- Transmit Security vs GitLab CI/CD
- Transmit Security vs Keycloak
- Transmit Security vs Nx Cloud
- Transmit Security vs Yarn
- Transmit Security vs Atlantis
- Transmit Security vs Coder
- Transmit Security vs Garden
- Transmit Security vs HCP Terraform
- Transmit Security vs Helm
- Transmit Security vs Jitsu
- Transmit Security vs Descope
- Transmit Security vs NICE Actimize
- Transmit Security vs Beyond Identity
- Transmit Security vs Sardine
- Transmit Security vs Feedzai
- Transmit Security vs Socure
- Transmit Security vs Unit21
- Transmit Security vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Transmit Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Transmit Security vs Ping Identity
- Transmit Security vs Stytch
- Transmit Security vs Rhombus Systems
- Transmit Security vs Semgrep
- Transmit Security vs Spot AI
- Transmit Security vs Syft
- Transmit Security vs ThetaRay
- Transmit Security vs Trivy
- Transmit Security vs Trulioo
