Cloud · head to head
Buildah vs OpenVPN

Buildah
Cloud
Build OCI container images without a daemon or a Dockerfile
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

OpenVPN
Networking
Open source VPN protocol with a commercial Access Server product priced per simultaneous connection
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Buildah linux only, with no native macOS or Windows support; OpenVPN open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer
- They diverge on capability: Buildah covers Daemonless builds, OpenVPN covers Open source core.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Buildah and OpenVPN actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Buildah
- Daemonless builds
- Rootless
- Dockerfile compatible
- Scriptable builds
Only in OpenVPN
- Open source core
- Access Server admin UI
- Per-connection licensing
- Free tier
- Cross-platform clients
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Buildah
- Building images in CI without a privileged Docker daemonnot OpenVPN
- Producing minimal images with tighter layer control than a Dockerfile givesnot OpenVPN
- Scripted image assembly where a Dockerfile is the wrong abstractionnot OpenVPN
OpenVPN
- A technical team wanting a fully free, self-configured VPN server using the open source protocol without any vendor relationshipnot Buildah
- A small business wanting a supported, easier-to-administer VPN server, willing to pay per concurrent connection rather than per employeenot Buildah
- An organisation with more staff than typical concurrent VPN usage, since Access Server bills only active simultaneous connections, not total accountsnot Buildah
- An IoT or large-scale deployment needing custom Enterprise pricing above 2,000 connectionsnot Buildah
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Buildah
- Linux only, with no native macOS or Windows support
- Scriptable builds are powerful but less portable and less familiar than a Dockerfile
- Narrow by design: it builds images and does not run them, so it needs Podman or another runtime alongside
OpenVPN
- Open source OpenVPN, while free, requires real technical skill to configure, secure and maintain without the Access Server admin layer
- Per-connection billing on Access Server means usage spikes, such as an all-hands remote day, can push simultaneous connections over a licensed limit and block new connections until usage drops or the plan is upgraded
- OpenVPN's traditional hub-and-spoke architecture routes traffic through a central server, unlike mesh VPN tools like Tailscale or NetBird that establish direct peer-to-peer connections where possible, which can add latency
- Client configuration and certificate management for the open source version is more manual and error-prone than newer VPN tools with zero-config onboarding
- Access Server pricing above the Growth tier reverts to custom Enterprise quoting, so very large deployments lose the pricing transparency of the lower tiers
- The protocol's throughput is generally lower than newer kernel-integrated protocols like WireGuard under equivalent conditions, which matters for high-bandwidth use cases
Pricing, plan by plan
Buildah
Free- BuildahFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
OpenVPN
Free- Access Server FreeFree
- Up to 2 simultaneous connections
- All features included
- Access Server Growth$7/month
- Per simultaneous connection beyond the free tier
- Annual billing
- Access Server Enterprise/IoT$undefined/month
- Custom pricing for 2,000+ connections
Which should you pick?
Choose Buildah if
- You need daemonless builds.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want rootless.
Choose OpenVPN if
- You need open source core.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- You also want access server admin ui.
Questions people ask
- Is Buildah or OpenVPN better?
- Neither clearly leads. Buildah starts at Free and OpenVPN at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Buildah or OpenVPN?
- Buildah starts at Free and OpenVPN at Free.
- Does Buildah or OpenVPN run on more platforms?
- Buildah runs on Linux. OpenVPN runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Buildah for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Buildah best used for?
- Buildah is most often used for building images in ci without a privileged docker daemon, producing minimal images with tighter layer control than a dockerfile gives, scripted image assembly where a dockerfile is the wrong abstraction. Of those, building images in ci without a privileged docker daemon and producing minimal images with tighter layer control than a dockerfile gives are not what OpenVPN is typically brought in for.
- What can Buildah do that OpenVPN cannot?
- Buildah covers Daemonless builds, Rootless, Dockerfile compatible, Scriptable builds. OpenVPN covers Open source core, Access Server admin UI, Per-connection licensing, Free tier.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Buildah: Is Buildah free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
OpenVPN: Is OpenVPN free?
The open source protocol and software are free under the GPL; Access Server, the commercial packaged product, charges per simultaneous connection beyond a free 2-connection tier.
Buildah: Do I still need a Dockerfile?
No. Buildah reads Dockerfiles if you have them, but images can be built entirely from shell commands instead.
OpenVPN: What counts as a connection for billing purposes?
A simultaneously active connected device, not a registered user account or total device count; unlimited accounts and devices can be created but only the licensed number can be connected at once.
Buildah: How is Buildah different from Podman?
Buildah builds images; Podman runs them. Podman actually embeds Buildah for its build command, and the two are designed to be used together.
OpenVPN: How does OpenVPN compare with WireGuard-based tools like Tailscale?
OpenVPN uses a traditional hub-and-spoke VPN architecture rather than the mesh, peer-to-peer approach used by newer tools like Tailscale or NetBird.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Buildah vs Flux
- Buildah vs Packer
- Buildah vs Portworx
- Buildah vs Porter
- Buildah vs Zeabur
- Buildah vs Pulumi
- Buildah vs Caddy
- Buildah vs K3s
- Buildah vs Northflank
- Buildah vs Oracle Cloud
- Buildah vs Orca Security
- Buildah vs containerd
- Buildah vs Vault
- Buildah vs Rancher
- Buildah vs minikube
- Buildah vs Longhorn
- Buildah vs OpenTelemetry
- Buildah vs pfSense
- Buildah vs ZeroTier
- Buildah vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Buildah vs Tailscale
- Buildah vs Icinga
- Buildah vs Zabbix
- Buildah vs Domotz
- Buildah vs LibreNMS
- Buildah vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Buildah vs Twingate
- Buildah vs Consul
- Buildah vs OPNsense
- Buildah vs Nebula
- Buildah vs ngrok
- Buildah vs Palo Alto Networks
- Buildah vs Splunk
- OpenVPN vs Flux
- OpenVPN vs Packer
- OpenVPN vs Portworx
- OpenVPN vs Porter
- OpenVPN vs Zeabur
- OpenVPN vs Pulumi
- OpenVPN vs Caddy
- OpenVPN vs K3s
- OpenVPN vs Northflank
- OpenVPN vs Oracle Cloud
- OpenVPN vs Orca Security
- OpenVPN vs containerd
- OpenVPN vs Vault
- OpenVPN vs Rancher
- OpenVPN vs minikube
- OpenVPN vs Longhorn
- OpenVPN vs OpenTelemetry
- OpenVPN vs pfSense
- OpenVPN vs ZeroTier
- OpenVPN vs MikroTik RouterOS
- OpenVPN vs Tailscale
- OpenVPN vs Icinga
- OpenVPN vs Zabbix
- OpenVPN vs Domotz
- OpenVPN vs LibreNMS
- OpenVPN vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- OpenVPN vs Twingate
- OpenVPN vs Consul
- OpenVPN vs OPNsense
- OpenVPN vs Nebula
- OpenVPN vs ngrok
- OpenVPN vs Palo Alto Networks
- OpenVPN vs Splunk
