Cybersecurity · head to head
Bitdefender VPN vs Mimecast

Bitdefender VPN
Cybersecurity
Consumer VPN sold by Bitdefender that runs on network infrastructure licensed from a third party rather than its own.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bitdefender VPN the network is not Bitdefender's: the servers and the Catapult Hydra protocol are licensed from Aura, formerly Pango and AnchorFree, so the company physically handling your traffic and subject to legal process is a United States based third party, not the Romanian vendor whose brand is on the client.; Mimecast no pricing is published for any product or plan, and every route ends at a quote or demo request
- They diverge on capability: Bitdefender VPN covers Suite integration, Mimecast covers Advanced threat detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bitdefender VPN and Mimecast actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bitdefender VPN | Mimecast |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $4/month |
| Platforms | Web | Email, Cloud, Collaboration |
| Founded | Unknown | 2003 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bitdefender VPN
- Suite integration
- Catapult Hydra transport
- WireGuard support
- Kill switch
- Auto-connect rules
- Split tunnelling
- Ad and tracker blocking
- Free tier included
Only in Mimecast
- Advanced threat detection
- Secure sharing
- Email encryption
- Message tracking
- Email archiving
- Legal hold
- eDiscovery
- Backup and recovery
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bitdefender VPN
- An existing Bitdefender customer who wants basic tunnel protection on public Wi-Fi without evaluating and buying a second productnot Mimecast
- Households wanting one security subscription covering malware protection and casual VPN use across a few devicesnot Mimecast
- Hiding browsing activity from an internet service provider or a shared network operator rather than defeating a determined adversarynot Mimecast
- Occasional access to region-locked content where a dedicated streaming-focused VPN would be more product than the need justifiesnot Mimecast
Mimecast
- Email security filtering against phishing and targeted attacksnot Bitdefender VPN
- Email archiving, continuity and compliance for organisationsnot Bitdefender VPN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bitdefender VPN
- The network is not Bitdefender's: the servers and the Catapult Hydra protocol are licensed from Aura, formerly Pango and AnchorFree, so the company physically handling your traffic and subject to legal process is a United States based third party, not the Romanian vendor whose brand is on the client.
- Catapult Hydra is proprietary and closed source, so unlike OpenVPN or WireGuard there is no public implementation for researchers to audit, and a buyer choosing on cryptographic grounds has nothing to inspect.
- There is no published independent no-logs audit of this service comparable to the Deloitte, PwC and KPMG engagements the standalone VPN vendors commission, so the no-logging position rests on the privacy policies of two separate companies rather than on any external assurance.
- The free tier bundled with the antivirus suites is capped at a small daily allowance and selects the server for you, so it is a demonstration rather than a usable VPN, and customers who assumed their suite included a VPN find they need a further paid upgrade.
- Feature depth is well below the dedicated market: no port forwarding, no dedicated IP, no multi-hop, no city-level server selection and no Linux or router client, so routers, NAS devices, consoles and anything needing an inbound connection cannot be covered at all.
Mimecast
- No pricing is published for any product or plan, and every route ends at a quote or demo request
- The platform is split into separately sold products for email security, awareness training, data protection and governance
- Collaboration threat protection, DMARC analysis, incident response and email archiving are all further add ons on top of those
Pricing, plan by plan
Bitdefender VPN
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Bitdefender VPN review.
Mimecast
$4/month- Defender$4/month
- Per user
- Threat protection
- Impersonation prevention
- Archive$3/month
- Email archiving
- Legal hold
- Search & recall
- Unified$6/month
- All Defender features
- All Archive features
- Backup
Which should you pick?
Choose Bitdefender VPN if
- You need suite integration.
- You also want catapult hydra transport.
Choose Mimecast if
- You need advanced threat detection.
- You work on Email, Cloud, Collaboration.
- You also want secure sharing.
Questions people ask
- Is Bitdefender VPN or Mimecast better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bitdefender VPN starts at On request and Mimecast at $4/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bitdefender VPN or Mimecast?
- Bitdefender VPN starts at On request and Mimecast at $4/month.
- Does Bitdefender VPN or Mimecast run on more platforms?
- Bitdefender VPN runs on Web. Mimecast runs on Email, Cloud, Collaboration.
- What is Bitdefender VPN best used for?
- Bitdefender VPN is most often used for an existing bitdefender customer who wants basic tunnel protection on public wi-fi without evaluating and buying a second product, households wanting one security subscription covering malware protection and casual vpn use across a few devices, hiding browsing activity from an internet service provider or a shared network operator rather than defeating a determined adversary, occasional access to region-locked content where a dedicated streaming-focused vpn would be more product than the need justifies. Of those, an existing bitdefender customer who wants basic tunnel protection on public wi-fi without evaluating and buying a second product and households wanting one security subscription covering malware protection and casual vpn use across a few devices are not what Mimecast is typically brought in for.
- What can Bitdefender VPN do that Mimecast cannot?
- Bitdefender VPN covers Suite integration, Catapult Hydra transport, WireGuard support, Kill switch. Mimecast covers Advanced threat detection, Secure sharing, Email encryption, Message tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bitdefender VPN: Who actually operates the servers?
The underlying VPN network and the Catapult Hydra protocol are licensed from Aura, previously known as Pango and AnchorFree, the operator of Hotspot Shield. Bitdefender identifies the arrangement in its VPN terms. Your traffic therefore passes through a United States based provider's infrastructure.
Mimecast: How much does Mimecast cost?
Mimecast does not publish pricing on its website. Customers must request a custom quote by contacting the sales team at +1 617 393 7000 or using the Get a Quote button.
SourceBitdefender VPN: Is the free version enough?
Only as a taster. It is capped at a small daily traffic allowance and chooses the server itself, which rules out streaming and any sustained use. It exists to demonstrate the feature inside the antivirus suite.
Mimecast: Is there a free trial of Mimecast?
Mimecast's trial and pricing options are not specified on the public website. Contact sales at +1 617 393 7000 or through their support portal at mimecastsupport.zendesk.com for trial availability.
SourceBitdefender VPN: Has the no-logs claim been independently audited?
There is no published independent no-logs audit of this service equivalent to those commissioned by the dedicated VPN providers. If an audited no-logging claim is what you are buying, this is not the product for it.
Bitdefender VPN: Does it work with streaming services?
Sometimes, but it is not built around that use case, there is no per-service server labelling, and there is no commitment to restoring access when a platform blocks a range. A streaming-focused provider is a better fit if that is the reason you want a VPN.
Bitdefender VPN: Can I run it on Linux or a router?
No. There is no Linux client and no router firmware or manual configuration option, so coverage is limited to the Windows, macOS, iOS and Android clients.
Related pages
More on Bitdefender VPN
Other head to heads
- Bitdefender VPN vs 1Password
- Bitdefender VPN vs Norton 360
- Bitdefender VPN vs LastPass
- Bitdefender VPN vs IBM QRadar
- Bitdefender VPN vs Quantexa
- Bitdefender VPN vs ExpressVPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs NordVPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Bitdefender VPN vs Jamf Pro
- Bitdefender VPN vs Proofpoint
- Bitdefender VPN vs March Networks
- Bitdefender VPN vs Jumio
- Bitdefender VPN vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Bitdefender VPN vs LogicManager
- Bitdefender VPN vs Mullvad VPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs Private Internet Access
- Bitdefender VPN vs CyberGhost VPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Bitdefender VPN vs Nessus
- Bitdefender VPN vs Qualys VMDR
- Bitdefender VPN vs Doppler
- Bitdefender VPN vs Chainguard
- Bitdefender VPN vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Bitdefender VPN vs Netwrix
- Bitdefender VPN vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Bitdefender VPN vs Transmit Security
- Bitdefender VPN vs TrustArc
- Bitdefender VPN vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Bitdefender VPN vs VMware Carbon Black
- Bitdefender VPN vs Wireshark
- Bitdefender VPN vs WorkOS
- Mimecast vs 1Password
- Mimecast vs Norton 360
- Mimecast vs LastPass
- Mimecast vs IBM QRadar
- Mimecast vs Quantexa
- Mimecast vs ExpressVPN
- Mimecast vs NordVPN
- Mimecast vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Mimecast vs Jamf Pro
- Mimecast vs Proofpoint
- Mimecast vs March Networks
- Mimecast vs Jumio
- Mimecast vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Mimecast vs LogicManager
- Mimecast vs Mullvad VPN
- Mimecast vs Private Internet Access
- Mimecast vs CyberGhost VPN
- Mimecast vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Mimecast vs Nessus
- Mimecast vs Qualys VMDR
- Mimecast vs Doppler
- Mimecast vs Chainguard
- Mimecast vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Mimecast vs Netwrix
- Mimecast vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Mimecast vs Transmit Security
- Mimecast vs TrustArc
- Mimecast vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Mimecast vs VMware Carbon Black
- Mimecast vs Wireshark
- Mimecast vs WorkOS

