Cybersecurity · head to head
Bitdefender VPN vs Blacksmith

Bitdefender VPN
Cybersecurity
Consumer VPN sold by Bitdefender that runs on network infrastructure licensed from a third party rather than its own.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Blacksmith has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Bitdefender VPN the network is not Bitdefender's: the servers and the Catapult Hydra protocol are licensed from Aura, formerly Pango and AnchorFree, so the company physically handling your traffic and subject to legal process is a United States based third party, not the Romanian vendor whose brand is on the client.; Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- They diverge on capability: Bitdefender VPN covers Suite integration, Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bitdefender VPN and Blacksmith actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bitdefender VPN | Blacksmith |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bitdefender VPN
- Suite integration
- Catapult Hydra transport
- WireGuard support
- Kill switch
- Auto-connect rules
- Split tunnelling
- Ad and tracker blocking
- Free tier included
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bitdefender VPN
- An existing Bitdefender customer who wants basic tunnel protection on public Wi-Fi without evaluating and buying a second productnot Blacksmith
- Households wanting one security subscription covering malware protection and casual VPN use across a few devicesnot Blacksmith
- Hiding browsing activity from an internet service provider or a shared network operator rather than defeating a determined adversarynot Blacksmith
- Occasional access to region-locked content where a dedicated streaming-focused VPN would be more product than the need justifiesnot Blacksmith
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Bitdefender VPN
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Bitdefender VPN
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Bitdefender VPN
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Bitdefender VPN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bitdefender VPN
- The network is not Bitdefender's: the servers and the Catapult Hydra protocol are licensed from Aura, formerly Pango and AnchorFree, so the company physically handling your traffic and subject to legal process is a United States based third party, not the Romanian vendor whose brand is on the client.
- Catapult Hydra is proprietary and closed source, so unlike OpenVPN or WireGuard there is no public implementation for researchers to audit, and a buyer choosing on cryptographic grounds has nothing to inspect.
- There is no published independent no-logs audit of this service comparable to the Deloitte, PwC and KPMG engagements the standalone VPN vendors commission, so the no-logging position rests on the privacy policies of two separate companies rather than on any external assurance.
- The free tier bundled with the antivirus suites is capped at a small daily allowance and selects the server for you, so it is a demonstration rather than a usable VPN, and customers who assumed their suite included a VPN find they need a further paid upgrade.
- Feature depth is well below the dedicated market: no port forwarding, no dedicated IP, no multi-hop, no city-level server selection and no Linux or router client, so routers, NAS devices, consoles and anything needing an inbound connection cannot be covered at all.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Pricing, plan by plan
Bitdefender VPN
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Bitdefender VPN review.
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Which should you pick?
Choose Bitdefender VPN if
- You need suite integration.
- You also want catapult hydra transport.
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Questions people ask
- Is Bitdefender VPN or Blacksmith better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bitdefender VPN starts at On request and Blacksmith at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bitdefender VPN or Blacksmith?
- Blacksmith has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Bitdefender VPN and Free for Blacksmith.
- Does Bitdefender VPN or Blacksmith run on more platforms?
- Bitdefender VPN runs on Web. Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Yes. Blacksmith has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Bitdefender VPN starts at On request.
- What is Bitdefender VPN best used for?
- Bitdefender VPN is most often used for an existing bitdefender customer who wants basic tunnel protection on public wi-fi without evaluating and buying a second product, households wanting one security subscription covering malware protection and casual vpn use across a few devices, hiding browsing activity from an internet service provider or a shared network operator rather than defeating a determined adversary, occasional access to region-locked content where a dedicated streaming-focused vpn would be more product than the need justifies. Of those, an existing bitdefender customer who wants basic tunnel protection on public wi-fi without evaluating and buying a second product and households wanting one security subscription covering malware protection and casual vpn use across a few devices are not what Blacksmith is typically brought in for.
- What can Bitdefender VPN do that Blacksmith cannot?
- Bitdefender VPN covers Suite integration, Catapult Hydra transport, WireGuard support, Kill switch. Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bitdefender VPN: Who actually operates the servers?
The underlying VPN network and the Catapult Hydra protocol are licensed from Aura, previously known as Pango and AnchorFree, the operator of Hotspot Shield. Bitdefender identifies the arrangement in its VPN terms. Your traffic therefore passes through a United States based provider's infrastructure.
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceBitdefender VPN: Is the free version enough?
Only as a taster. It is capped at a small daily traffic allowance and chooses the server itself, which rules out streaming and any sustained use. It exists to demonstrate the feature inside the antivirus suite.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceBitdefender VPN: Has the no-logs claim been independently audited?
There is no published independent no-logs audit of this service equivalent to those commissioned by the dedicated VPN providers. If an audited no-logging claim is what you are buying, this is not the product for it.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceBitdefender VPN: Does it work with streaming services?
Sometimes, but it is not built around that use case, there is no per-service server labelling, and there is no commitment to restoring access when a platform blocks a range. A streaming-focused provider is a better fit if that is the reason you want a VPN.
Bitdefender VPN: Can I run it on Linux or a router?
No. There is no Linux client and no router firmware or manual configuration option, so coverage is limited to the Windows, macOS, iOS and Android clients.
Related pages
More on Bitdefender VPN
Other head to heads
- Bitdefender VPN vs 1Password
- Bitdefender VPN vs Norton 360
- Bitdefender VPN vs LastPass
- Bitdefender VPN vs IBM QRadar
- Bitdefender VPN vs Quantexa
- Bitdefender VPN vs ExpressVPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs NordVPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Bitdefender VPN vs Jamf Pro
- Bitdefender VPN vs Proofpoint
- Bitdefender VPN vs March Networks
- Bitdefender VPN vs Jumio
- Bitdefender VPN vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Bitdefender VPN vs LogicManager
- Bitdefender VPN vs Mullvad VPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs Private Internet Access
- Bitdefender VPN vs CyberGhost VPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs WarpBuild
- Bitdefender VPN vs Depot
- Bitdefender VPN vs Namespace
- Bitdefender VPN vs Earthly
- Bitdefender VPN vs Nx Cloud
- Bitdefender VPN vs OpsLevel
- Bitdefender VPN vs Garden
- Bitdefender VPN vs ConfigCat
- Bitdefender VPN vs Dagger
- Bitdefender VPN vs Nix
- Bitdefender VPN vs Rust
- Bitdefender VPN vs Ansible
- Bitdefender VPN vs PartyKit
- Bitdefender VPN vs PhpStorm
- Bitdefender VPN vs Pieces for Developers
- Bitdefender VPN vs RAD Studio
- Bitdefender VPN vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs 1Password
- Blacksmith vs Norton 360
- Blacksmith vs LastPass
- Blacksmith vs IBM QRadar
- Blacksmith vs Quantexa
- Blacksmith vs ExpressVPN
- Blacksmith vs NordVPN
- Blacksmith vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Blacksmith vs Jamf Pro
- Blacksmith vs Proofpoint
- Blacksmith vs March Networks
- Blacksmith vs Jumio
- Blacksmith vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Blacksmith vs LogicManager
- Blacksmith vs Mullvad VPN
- Blacksmith vs Private Internet Access
- Blacksmith vs CyberGhost VPN
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs PartyKit
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs RAD Studio
- Blacksmith vs Refact
