Machine Learning · head to head
BigQuery ML vs Evidence

Evidence
Business Intelligence
Business intelligence as code for teams and AI agents
- From
- $2500/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only BigQuery ML has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: BigQuery ML not available in BigQuery's Standard edition, so the cheapest tier cannot use it; Evidence high starting price at $2,500/month limits small team adoption
- They diverge on capability: BigQuery ML covers SQL-based ML, Evidence covers Analytics Agent.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which BigQuery ML and Evidence actually diverge.
| Attribute | BigQuery ML | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $2500/month |
| Pricing model | usage-based | Flat team pricing with no per-user fees |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Cloud, Embedded |
| Category | Machine Learning | Business Intelligence |
| Founded | 2008 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in BigQuery ML
- SQL-based ML
- AutoML Tables
- Model export
- Prediction functions
- Feature preprocessing
- BigQuery
- Vertex AI
- TensorFlow
Only in Evidence
- Analytics Agent
- Code-based infrastructure
- Development environment
- Visualization tools
- Embedded analytics
- Enterprise security
- Multi-channel access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
BigQuery ML
- Training models in SQL without exporting datanot Evidence
- Linear and logistic regression on warehouse datanot Evidence
- K-means clustering and matrix factorisation for recommendationsnot Evidence
- Time series forecasting with ARIMA_PLUSnot Evidence
- Running imported ONNX, TensorFlow or XGBoost models against BigQuery datanot Evidence
Evidence
- Building version-controlled analytics infrastructurenot BigQuery ML
- Enabling AI agents to answer business questionsnot BigQuery ML
- Delivering analytics through multiple channels (web, Slack, ChatGPT)not BigQuery ML
- Embedding white-labeled analytics in productsnot BigQuery ML
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
BigQuery ML
- Not available in BigQuery's Standard edition, so the cheapest tier cannot use it
- Billed through BigQuery compute and storage rather than as its own product, so training cost tracks data scanned
- Remote models incur extra Agent Platform charges on top
- Externally trained model types such as boosted trees and AutoML run through Agent Platform rather than inside BigQuery
Evidence
- High starting price at $2,500/month limits small team adoption
- No freemium option for evaluation or learning
- Code-based approach has steeper learning curve than visual tools
- AI credits limited on Team plan; additional credits cost extra
- Requires Git workflow familiarity for effective collaboration
Pricing, plan by plan
BigQuery ML
Free- Free TierFree
- 10GB storage
- 1TB queries
- On-Demand$5/TB
- Pay per TB scanned
- ML training costs
Evidence
$2500/month- Team$2500/month
- Unlimited users
- Monthly billing
- Analytics Agent
- Enterprise$null/custom
- All Team features
- SSO/SAML authentication
- SCIM directory sync
Which should you pick?
Choose BigQuery ML if
- You need sql-based ml.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want automl tables.
Choose Evidence if
- You need analytics agent.
- You work on Cloud, Embedded.
- You also want code-based infrastructure.
Questions people ask
- Is BigQuery ML or Evidence better?
- Neither clearly leads. BigQuery ML starts at Free and Evidence at $2500/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, BigQuery ML or Evidence?
- BigQuery ML has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for BigQuery ML and $2500/month for Evidence.
- Does BigQuery ML or Evidence run on more platforms?
- BigQuery ML runs on Web. Evidence runs on Cloud, Embedded.
- Can I use BigQuery ML for free?
- Yes. BigQuery ML has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Evidence starts at $2500/month.
- What is BigQuery ML best used for?
- BigQuery ML is most often used for training models in sql without exporting data, linear and logistic regression on warehouse data, k-means clustering and matrix factorisation for recommendations, time series forecasting with arima_plus. Of those, training models in sql without exporting data and linear and logistic regression on warehouse data are not what Evidence is typically brought in for.
- What can BigQuery ML do that Evidence cannot?
- BigQuery ML covers SQL-based ML, AutoML Tables, Model export, Prediction functions. Evidence covers Analytics Agent, Code-based infrastructure, Development environment, Visualization tools.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
BigQuery ML: How much does Google Cloud BigQuery ML cost?
BigQuery ML pricing is not specified separately on Google Cloud's pricing page. It follows the same pay-as-you-go model as BigQuery, charging per terabyte of data scanned during analysis. Customers receive $300 in free credits and can use 20+ products free up to monthly limits.
SourceEvidence: Does Evidence have per-user pricing?
No, Evidence offers one flat price for unlimited users at $2,500/month on the Team plan with a 30-day free trial.
SourceBigQuery ML: Does Google Cloud offer a free trial?
Yes, new customers get $300 in free credits and all customers can use 20+ Google Cloud products free up to their monthly usage limits.
SourceEvidence: How many AI credits come with Team plan?
Team plan includes 20,000 AI credits monthly at $0.01 per additional credit. Enterprise offers custom credit packages.
SourceEvidence: What is included in the Enterprise plan?
Enterprise adds SSO/SAML, SCIM directory sync, row-level access rules, embedding capabilities, and custom deployment options at custom pricing.
SourceRelated pages
More on BigQuery ML
Other head to heads
- BigQuery ML vs AWS SageMaker
- BigQuery ML vs Azure Machine Learning
- BigQuery ML vs DataRobot
- BigQuery ML vs Databricks
- BigQuery ML vs SAS
- BigQuery ML vs scikit-learn
- BigQuery ML vs Snowflake
- BigQuery ML vs Weka
- BigQuery ML vs MATLAB
- BigQuery ML vs Palantir Foundry
- BigQuery ML vs Apache Spark MLlib
- BigQuery ML vs Hugging Face
- BigQuery ML vs Kubeflow
- BigQuery ML vs Langwatch
- BigQuery ML vs LlamaIndex
- BigQuery ML vs Milvus
- BigQuery ML vs Neptune.ai
- BigQuery ML vs Amazon Redshift ML
- BigQuery ML vs Cube
- BigQuery ML vs Zenlytic
- BigQuery ML vs Hex
- BigQuery ML vs Fabi
- BigQuery ML vs Phocas
- BigQuery ML vs Rill Data
- BigQuery ML vs GoodData
- BigQuery ML vs Grow
- BigQuery ML vs Sisense
- BigQuery ML vs MicroStrategy
- BigQuery ML vs Anaplan
- BigQuery ML vs Deepnote
- BigQuery ML vs Mode
- BigQuery ML vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- BigQuery ML vs Periscope Data
- BigQuery ML vs Zoho Analytics
- BigQuery ML vs Baremetrics
- BigQuery ML vs Board International
- Evidence vs AWS SageMaker
- Evidence vs Azure Machine Learning
- Evidence vs DataRobot
- Evidence vs Databricks
- Evidence vs SAS
- Evidence vs scikit-learn
- Evidence vs Snowflake
- Evidence vs Weka
- Evidence vs MATLAB
- Evidence vs Palantir Foundry
- Evidence vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Evidence vs Hugging Face
- Evidence vs Kubeflow
- Evidence vs Langwatch
- Evidence vs LlamaIndex
- Evidence vs Milvus
- Evidence vs Neptune.ai
- Evidence vs Amazon Redshift ML
- Evidence vs Cube
- Evidence vs Zenlytic
- Evidence vs Hex
- Evidence vs Fabi
- Evidence vs Phocas
- Evidence vs Rill Data
- Evidence vs GoodData
- Evidence vs Grow
- Evidence vs Sisense
- Evidence vs MicroStrategy
- Evidence vs Anaplan
- Evidence vs Deepnote
- Evidence vs Mode
- Evidence vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- Evidence vs Periscope Data
- Evidence vs Zoho Analytics
- Evidence vs Baremetrics
- Evidence vs Board International

