Cybersecurity · head to head
Baffle vs Microsoft Sentinel

Baffle
Cybersecurity
Transparent proxy that encrypts, tokenises and masks database fields without application code changes
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Microsoft Sentinel has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Baffle the proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.; Microsoft Sentinel billing is driven by the volume of log data ingested per day, so cost scales with log noise rather than with users or protected assets
- They diverge on capability: Baffle covers Transparent proxy deployment, Microsoft Sentinel covers AI-powered analytics.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Baffle and Microsoft Sentinel actually diverge.
| Attribute | Baffle | Microsoft Sentinel |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | usage-based |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Linux, Web | Web, Api |
| Founded | Unknown | 1975 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Baffle
- Transparent proxy deployment
- Field-level encryption
- Tokenisation
- Format-preserving de-identification
- Dynamic data masking
- Bring your own key
- Analytics and pipeline support
- AI pipeline protection
Only in Microsoft Sentinel
- AI-powered analytics
- Fusion detection
- UEBA
- Automated response playbooks
- Threat intelligence
- Hunting queries
- Workbooks
- Incident management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Baffle
- A bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account datanot Microsoft Sentinel
- A company wanting to take a reporting database out of PCI scope by tokenising card fields before they landnot Microsoft Sentinel
- A healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administernot Microsoft Sentinel
- A team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an AI retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobsnot Microsoft Sentinel
Microsoft Sentinel
- Cloud-based security information and event management (SIEM)not Baffle
- Extended detection and response (XDR) across enterprise infrastructurenot Baffle
- Data ingestion and long-term security analyticsnot Baffle
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Baffle
- The proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.
- What you can still do in SQL depends on the protection mode chosen, and stronger modes restrict comparisons, joins and aggregations on protected columns, which can quietly break existing reports and analytics.
- Database and driver coverage is finite, so an organisation with an unusual engine, an old driver or heavy use of stored procedures may find its most important system is exactly the one not supported.
- Pricing is unpublished and scales with protected data stores, which means an enterprise trying to protect a long tail of small databases pays disproportionately compared with protecting a handful of large ones.
- Key management is your responsibility under bring your own key, and while that is the correct security posture, it moves a real operational burden and a genuine data-loss risk onto the customer.
Microsoft Sentinel
- Billing is driven by the volume of log data ingested per day, so cost scales with log noise rather than with users or protected assets
- Commitment tier discounts require reserving daily ingestion capacity in advance, and a tier cannot be downgraded until 31 days have passed
- Commitment tiers start at 100 GB per day, above what smaller estates ingest
- Charges for Log Analytics, Logic Apps and Machine Learning are billed separately on top of Sentinel itself
- The free allowance is only up to 5 MB per user per day for selected Microsoft 365 security logs
- Promotional commitment pricing is time limited and locks in only until a stated end date
Pricing, plan by plan
Baffle
On request- Baffle Data Protection Services$undefined/year
- Quoted by protected data stores and deployment scale
- Self-managed and cloud marketplace deployment options
- Annual subscription
Microsoft Sentinel
Free- Pay-As-You-Go$2.46/day
- Per GB ingested
- 90-day retention
- First 31 days free for new workspaces
- Commitment TiersFree
- 100GB to 50TB tiers
- Up to 65% discount
- Predictable billing
- Microsoft 365 E5Free
- Free data ingestion for M365 logs
- Bundled with E5 license
Which should you pick?
Choose Baffle if
- You need transparent proxy deployment.
- You work on Linux, Web.
- You also want field-level encryption.
Choose Microsoft Sentinel if
- You need ai-powered analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want fusion detection.
Questions people ask
- Is Baffle or Microsoft Sentinel better?
- Neither clearly leads. Baffle starts at On request and Microsoft Sentinel at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Baffle or Microsoft Sentinel?
- Microsoft Sentinel has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Baffle and Free for Microsoft Sentinel.
- Does Baffle or Microsoft Sentinel run on more platforms?
- Baffle runs on Linux, Web. Microsoft Sentinel runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Microsoft Sentinel for free?
- Yes. Microsoft Sentinel has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Baffle starts at On request.
- What is Baffle best used for?
- Baffle is most often used for a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data, a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land, a healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administer, a team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an ai retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobs. Of those, a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data and a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land are not what Microsoft Sentinel is typically brought in for.
- What can Baffle do that Microsoft Sentinel cannot?
- Baffle covers Transparent proxy deployment, Field-level encryption, Tokenisation, Format-preserving de-identification. Microsoft Sentinel covers AI-powered analytics, Fusion detection, UEBA, Automated response playbooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Baffle: Do applications need code changes?
No. That is the central design choice. Baffle intercepts traffic as a proxy rather than requiring an SDK call at every read and write.
Microsoft Sentinel: How is Microsoft Sentinel pricing calculated?
Microsoft Sentinel uses a pay-as-you-go usage-based model where you pay only for data ingested, stored, and consumed. Flexible commitment tiers are available to reduce total cost of ownership, with specific rates not published on the public pricing page. Source: https://www.microsoft.com/security/business/siem-and-xdr/microsoft-sentinel/
SourceBaffle: Can you still query encrypted columns?
Partly, and it depends on the protection mode. Some modes preserve equality matching and format, stronger modes restrict what SQL operations remain possible, so this must be tested against your actual queries.
Microsoft Sentinel: Does Microsoft Sentinel require an Azure subscription?
Yes, Microsoft Sentinel requires a Microsoft Azure subscription to operate. Pricing is handled through Azure and varies based on data consumption and the commitment tier you select. Source: https://www.microsoft.com/security/business/siem-and-xdr/microsoft-sentinel/
SourceBaffle: Does it take systems out of PCI scope?
Tokenisation can reduce scope by ensuring card data never lands in the protected system, but scope reduction is an assessor judgement, not a product setting.
Baffle: Who holds the encryption keys?
You do, through your own key management service. Baffle supports bring your own key rather than holding customer keys itself.
Related pages
More on Microsoft Sentinel
Other head to heads
- Baffle vs Very Good Security
- Baffle vs HashiCorp Vault
- Baffle vs 1Password
- Baffle vs LastPass
- Baffle vs Mullvad VPN
- Baffle vs Private Internet Access
- Baffle vs IVPN
- Baffle vs TunnelBear
- Baffle vs Enpass
- Baffle vs Passbolt
- Baffle vs Feedzai
- Baffle vs Genetec Security Center
- Baffle vs Tenable Nessus
- Baffle vs Transmit Security
- Baffle vs TrustArc
- Baffle vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Baffle vs VMware Carbon Black
- Baffle vs Wireshark
- Baffle vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Baffle vs Norton 360
- Baffle vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Baffle vs IBM QRadar
- Baffle vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Baffle vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Baffle vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Baffle vs Legit Security
- Baffle vs Sysdig
- Baffle vs Endor Labs
- Baffle vs Proton Mail
- Baffle vs Veriff
- Baffle vs Brave Browser
- Baffle vs March Networks
- Baffle vs Salient CompleteView
- Baffle vs Sumsub
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Very Good Security
- Microsoft Sentinel vs HashiCorp Vault
- Microsoft Sentinel vs 1Password
- Microsoft Sentinel vs LastPass
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Mullvad VPN
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Private Internet Access
- Microsoft Sentinel vs IVPN
- Microsoft Sentinel vs TunnelBear
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Enpass
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Passbolt
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Feedzai
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Genetec Security Center
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Tenable Nessus
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Transmit Security
- Microsoft Sentinel vs TrustArc
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Microsoft Sentinel vs VMware Carbon Black
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Wireshark
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Norton 360
- Microsoft Sentinel vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Microsoft Sentinel vs IBM QRadar
- Microsoft Sentinel vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Microsoft Sentinel vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Legit Security
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Sysdig
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Endor Labs
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Proton Mail
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Veriff
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Brave Browser
- Microsoft Sentinel vs March Networks
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Salient CompleteView
- Microsoft Sentinel vs Sumsub

