Cybersecurity · head to head
Baffle vs Keygen

Baffle
Cybersecurity
Transparent proxy that encrypts, tokenises and masks database fields without application code changes
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Keygen has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Baffle the proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.; Keygen specific Active Licensed User (ALU) pricing not listed; requires interactive pricing calculator
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Baffle and Keygen actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Baffle
- Transparent proxy deployment
- Field-level encryption
- Tokenisation
- Format-preserving de-identification
- Dynamic data masking
- Bring your own key
- Analytics and pipeline support
- AI pipeline protection
Only in Keygen
Nothing recorded that Baffle does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Baffle
- A bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account datanot Keygen
- A company wanting to take a reporting database out of PCI scope by tokenising card fields before they landnot Keygen
- A healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administernot Keygen
- A team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an AI retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobsnot Keygen
Keygen
- Software licensing and distributionnot Baffle
- Product release managementnot Baffle
- API-based license verificationnot Baffle
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Baffle
- The proxy sits in the production data path, so it becomes a latency contributor and a failure domain, and any deployment needs load and failover testing that customers routinely underestimate.
- What you can still do in SQL depends on the protection mode chosen, and stronger modes restrict comparisons, joins and aggregations on protected columns, which can quietly break existing reports and analytics.
- Database and driver coverage is finite, so an organisation with an unusual engine, an old driver or heavy use of stored procedures may find its most important system is exactly the one not supported.
- Pricing is unpublished and scales with protected data stores, which means an enterprise trying to protect a long tail of small databases pays disproportionately compared with protecting a handful of large ones.
- Key management is your responsibility under bring your own key, and while that is the correct security posture, it moves a real operational burden and a genuine data-loss risk onto the customer.
Keygen
- Specific Active Licensed User (ALU) pricing not listed; requires interactive pricing calculator
- Whitelabel API add-on costs $995/year per domain
Pricing, plan by plan
Baffle
On request- Baffle Data Protection Services$undefined/year
- Quoted by protected data stores and deployment scale
- Self-managed and cloud marketplace deployment options
- Annual subscription
Keygen
Free- DevFree
- Up to 100 Active Licensed Users
- 10 product releases
- Core licensing API only
- Std$null/month
- Scaling with licensing volume
- Distribution API (OCI/Docker, npm, Rubygems, PyPI, Tauri)
- Flat monthly/yearly fees
- Enterprise$null/month
- Audit logs
- SAML/SSO
- IP filtering
Which should you pick?
Choose Baffle if
- You need transparent proxy deployment.
- You work on Linux, Web.
- You also want field-level encryption.
Questions people ask
- Is Baffle or Keygen better?
- Neither clearly leads. Baffle starts at On request and Keygen at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Baffle or Keygen?
- Keygen has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Baffle and Free for Keygen.
- Does Baffle or Keygen run on more platforms?
- Baffle runs on Linux, Web. Keygen runs on Web.
- Can I use Keygen for free?
- Yes. Keygen has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Baffle starts at On request.
- What is Baffle best used for?
- Baffle is most often used for a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data, a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land, a healthcare organisation that must ensure database administrators and cloud operators cannot read patient identifiers in the tables they administer, a team moving regulated data into a warehouse or an ai retrieval pipeline that needs identifiers de-identified in transit without rewriting the ingest jobs. Of those, a bank with a legacy application it cannot safely refactor that has an audit finding requiring field-level encryption of account data and a company wanting to take a reporting database out of pci scope by tokenising card fields before they land are not what Keygen is typically brought in for.
- What can Baffle do that Keygen cannot?
- Baffle covers Transparent proxy deployment, Field-level encryption, Tokenisation, Format-preserving de-identification.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Baffle: Do applications need code changes?
No. That is the central design choice. Baffle intercepts traffic as a proxy rather than requiring an SDK call at every read and write.
Keygen: Does Keygen have a free tier?
Yes, the Dev tier is free and supports up to 100 Active Licensed Users with 10 product releases and core licensing API access.
SourceBaffle: Can you still query encrypted columns?
Partly, and it depends on the protection mode. Some modes preserve equality matching and format, stronger modes restrict what SQL operations remain possible, so this must be tested against your actual queries.
Keygen: How is Keygen pricing calculated?
Keygen uses scalable, flat monthly or yearly fees based on your licensing volume (Active Licensed Users). No revenue share or transaction fees are charged.
SourceBaffle: Does it take systems out of PCI scope?
Tokenisation can reduce scope by ensuring card data never lands in the protected system, but scope reduction is an assessor judgement, not a product setting.
Keygen: Does Keygen charge for additional features like SSO?
SAML/SSO is included in Enterprise tiers. Whitelabel API support costs $995/year per domain. Premium Support SLA is $995/month for Enterprise.
SourceBaffle: Who holds the encryption keys?
You do, through your own key management service. Baffle supports bring your own key rather than holding customer keys itself.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Baffle vs Very Good Security
- Baffle vs HashiCorp Vault
- Baffle vs 1Password
- Baffle vs LastPass
- Baffle vs Mullvad VPN
- Baffle vs Private Internet Access
- Baffle vs IVPN
- Baffle vs TunnelBear
- Baffle vs Enpass
- Baffle vs Passbolt
- Baffle vs Feedzai
- Baffle vs Genetec Security Center
- Baffle vs Tenable Nessus
- Baffle vs Transmit Security
- Baffle vs TrustArc
- Baffle vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Baffle vs VMware Carbon Black
- Baffle vs Wireshark
- Baffle vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Baffle vs Norton 360
- Baffle vs Infisical
- Baffle vs Logto
- Baffle vs Teleport
- Baffle vs Snyk
- Baffle vs Bitwarden
- Baffle vs Brave Browser
- Baffle vs WireGuard
- Baffle vs Semgrep
- Baffle vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Baffle vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Baffle vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Baffle vs HID Global
- Baffle vs IBM QRadar
- Keygen vs Very Good Security
- Keygen vs HashiCorp Vault
- Keygen vs 1Password
- Keygen vs LastPass
- Keygen vs Mullvad VPN
- Keygen vs Private Internet Access
- Keygen vs IVPN
- Keygen vs TunnelBear
- Keygen vs Enpass
- Keygen vs Passbolt
- Keygen vs Feedzai
- Keygen vs Genetec Security Center
- Keygen vs Tenable Nessus
- Keygen vs Transmit Security
- Keygen vs TrustArc
- Keygen vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Keygen vs VMware Carbon Black
- Keygen vs Wireshark
- Keygen vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Keygen vs Norton 360
- Keygen vs Infisical
- Keygen vs Logto
- Keygen vs Teleport
- Keygen vs Snyk
- Keygen vs Bitwarden
- Keygen vs Brave Browser
- Keygen vs WireGuard
- Keygen vs Semgrep
- Keygen vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Keygen vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Keygen vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Keygen vs HID Global
- Keygen vs IBM QRadar

