APIs · head to head
Backendless vs Noloco

Backendless
APIs
Visual app development platform with REST APIs and cloud backend
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Noloco
No-Code
Client portals and internal tools built over data you already have
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Backendless has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Backendless free tier limited to 50 API requests per minute and 20 database tables; Noloco pricing follows user counts, and a client portal is by definition many low-activity users, so an agency with a few hundred client logins climbs the bands quickly for people who sign in twice a month.
- They diverge on capability: Backendless covers REST API, Noloco covers Row-level permissions.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Backendless and Noloco actually diverge.
| Attribute | Backendless | Noloco |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Unknown | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Cloud, Visual builder | Web |
| Category | APIs | No-Code |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Backendless
- REST API
- Real-time database
- Cloud code
- Custom integrations
- Webhooks
- Cloud functions
- Cloud support
- Visual builder support
Only in Noloco
- Row-level permissions
- Multiple data sources
- Client portals
- Workflows
- Forms and record detail pages
- White labelling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Backendless
- API Developmentnot Noloco
- API Gatewaynot Noloco
- API Testingnot Noloco
- API Documentationnot Noloco
- Microservicesnot Noloco
Noloco
- Giving clients a branded portal onto their own records in an Airtable basenot Backendless
- Replacing shared spreadsheets with a permissioned internal tool for an operations teamnot Backendless
- A lightweight CRM over a PostgreSQL database that already existsnot Backendless
- Partner or contractor dashboards where each party must see only its own jobs and documentsnot Backendless
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Backendless
- Free tier limited to 50 API requests per minute and 20 database tables
- Smaller community and integration ecosystem compared to Firebase or AWS
- Customization beyond codeless tools requires developer expertise
- Limited documentation for advanced use cases and edge cases
Noloco
- Pricing follows user counts, and a client portal is by definition many low-activity users, so an agency with a few hundred client logins climbs the bands quickly for people who sign in twice a month.
- Limits are inherited from the data source. Airtable record ceilings, API rate limits and slow queries appear in the portal your customers use, and no setting inside Noloco can fix them.
- Design control is deliberately narrow. You get a consistent application shell rather than a bespoke interface, which is fine for operations and a problem for anything marketing-led.
- It is a small vendor competing directly with Airtable Interfaces and Softr, both far larger, so roadmap pace and long-term viability are legitimate procurement questions.
- Output is responsive web only, with no native mobile application and no offline mode, so field staff on poor connections are not served by it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Backendless
Free- FreeFree
- 50 API requests/minute
- 20 database tables
- 1 GB file storage
- Scale Variable$15/month
- Unlimited API requests/month
- 100 database tables
- 10 GB file storage
- Scale Fixed$15/month
- Same as Scale Variable
- Fixed monthly pricing
Noloco
On request- Noloco$undefined/year
- Tiered plans differentiated by user counts, data sources and white labelling
- Trial period rather than a permanent free plan
- Higher tiers add custom domains, advanced permissions and priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose Backendless if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Visual builder.
- You also want real-time database.
Questions people ask
- Is Backendless or Noloco better?
- Neither clearly leads. Backendless starts at Free and Noloco at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Backendless or Noloco?
- Backendless has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Backendless and On request for Noloco.
- Does Backendless or Noloco run on more platforms?
- Backendless runs on Cloud, Visual builder. Noloco runs on Web.
- Can I use Backendless for free?
- Yes. Backendless has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Noloco starts at On request.
- What is Backendless best used for?
- Backendless is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what Noloco is typically brought in for.
- What can Backendless do that Noloco cannot?
- Backendless covers REST API, Real-time database, Cloud code, Custom integrations. Noloco covers Row-level permissions, Multiple data sources, Client portals, Workflows.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Backendless: Does Backendless have a free tier?
Backendless Free plan ($0/month) includes 50 API requests per minute, 20 database tables, 1 GB file storage, 1 visualization, 2 security roles, and basic cloud code capabilities.
SourceNoloco: Do I need Airtable to use it?
No. Airtable is the most common source but PostgreSQL, MySQL, Google Sheets, HubSpot and built-in Noloco tables all work.
Backendless: What features does the Scale plan include?
Scale plan ($15+/month) provides unlimited API requests per month, 100 database tables, 10 GB file storage, 5 visualizations, 10 custom API keys, daily backups, free SSL certificates, and 1,000 real-time connections.
SourceNoloco: Can external clients log in without paying for seats?
Client and internal users are counted differently, but they are still counted, so a portal with many client logins moves you up the plan bands. Check the current band definitions before committing to a per-client model.
Backendless: Can I add more storage or increase API limits?
Yes, Backendless offers Function Packs ranging from $5-$399/month to increase specific limits such as storage, API requests, or security features.
SourceNoloco: How is this different from Softr?
Both build portals over existing data. Noloco leans harder on permissions and multiple database sources; Softr leans on templates, speed to a first version and a bigger ecosystem.
Backendless: Does Backendless support offline functionality?
Backendless supports real-time sync and offline capabilities for mobile apps, allowing data to sync when connectivity is restored.
SourceBackendless: Is Backendless Pro available for self-hosting?
Yes, Backendless Pro Community Edition is available under free licensing for core functionality. Managed Backendless is a paid option for self-hosted deployments with request-based pricing.
SourceBackendless: What are Backendless's integration limitations?
While Backendless supports many integrations, it has a smaller integration library compared to competitors. Finding solutions to edge cases or complex setups may require more development effort.
SourceRelated pages
More on Backendless
Other head to heads
- Backendless vs PocketBase
- Backendless vs Appwrite
- Backendless vs Hasura
- Backendless vs Parse Server
- Backendless vs Thunder Client
- Backendless vs Janus Gateway
- Backendless vs Marqeta
- Backendless vs i2c
- Backendless vs Strapi
- Backendless vs Sanity
- Backendless vs Increase
- Backendless vs Flybits
- Backendless vs Payload CMS
- Backendless vs Portkey
- Backendless vs Prisma
- Backendless vs RapidAPI
- Backendless vs REST Client VSCode
- Backendless vs Rutter
- Backendless vs Softr
- Backendless vs Stacker
- Backendless vs AppSheet
- Backendless vs Glide
- Backendless vs Appsmith
- Backendless vs Superblocks
- Backendless vs ToolJet
- Backendless vs Whalesync
- Backendless vs Caspio
- Backendless vs Zoho Creator
- Backendless vs Appian
- Backendless vs WeWeb
- Backendless vs Corteza
- Backendless vs Directual
- Backendless vs Draftbit
- Backendless vs Momen
- Backendless vs Pabbly Connect
- Noloco vs PocketBase
- Noloco vs Appwrite
- Noloco vs Hasura
- Noloco vs Parse Server
- Noloco vs Thunder Client
- Noloco vs Janus Gateway
- Noloco vs Marqeta
- Noloco vs i2c
- Noloco vs Strapi
- Noloco vs Sanity
- Noloco vs Increase
- Noloco vs Flybits
- Noloco vs Payload CMS
- Noloco vs Portkey
- Noloco vs Prisma
- Noloco vs RapidAPI
- Noloco vs REST Client VSCode
- Noloco vs Rutter
- Noloco vs Softr
- Noloco vs Stacker
- Noloco vs AppSheet
- Noloco vs Glide
- Noloco vs Appsmith
- Noloco vs Superblocks
- Noloco vs ToolJet
- Noloco vs Whalesync
- Noloco vs Caspio
- Noloco vs Zoho Creator
- Noloco vs Appian
- Noloco vs WeWeb
- Noloco vs Corteza
- Noloco vs Directual
- Noloco vs Draftbit
- Noloco vs Momen
- Noloco vs Pabbly Connect
