Machine Learning · head to head
Azure Machine Learning vs Dundas BI

Azure Machine Learning
Machine Learning
Microsoft's managed platform for training, tracking and deploying models on Azure
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Dundas BI
Business Intelligence
Flexible business intelligence platform
- From
- $500/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Azure Machine Learning has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Azure Machine Learning managed online endpoints are billed per underlying virtual machine for as long as the deployment exists, with no scale to zero, so a model answering a handful of requests a day costs the same as one answering thousands.; Dundas BI the published Embedded BI Package starts from about $4,738.70 USD per month billed annually for 8 core capacity
- They diverge on capability: Azure Machine Learning covers Workspace, Dundas BI covers White-labeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Azure Machine Learning and Dundas BI actually diverge.
| Attribute | Azure Machine Learning | Dundas BI |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $500/month |
| Pricing model | usage-based | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Azure Cloud | Web, Embedded, Mobile |
| Category | Machine Learning | Business Intelligence |
| Founded | 1975 | 1992 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Azure Machine Learning
- Workspace
- Compute clusters
- MLflow-compatible tracking
- Model registry
- Managed online endpoints
- Batch endpoints
- Automated machine learning
- Pipelines
Only in Dundas BI
- White-labeling
- Embedded Analytics
- Data Preparation
- Custom Visualizations
- API
- SQL Server
- Oracle
- PostgreSQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Azure Machine Learning
- Enterprises standardised on Azure where using a different cloud for machine learning would mean a fresh security and compliance reviewnot Dundas BI
- Training that needs to burst onto a GPU cluster occasionally without buying hardware, with the cluster scaling back to zero afterwardsnot Dundas BI
- Regulated workloads that must stay inside a virtual network with private endpoints and auditable role-based accessnot Dundas BI
- Teams already using MLflow who want the tracking interface they know backed by a managed service and enterprise identitynot Dundas BI
Dundas BI
- Embedding dashboards and analytics inside another applicationnot Azure Machine Learning
- Self service business intelligence and ad hoc reportingnot Azure Machine Learning
- Building custom data visualisations against open BI APIsnot Azure Machine Learning
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Azure Machine Learning
- Managed online endpoints are billed per underlying virtual machine for as long as the deployment exists, with no scale to zero, so a model answering a handful of requests a day costs the same as one answering thousands.
- GPU capacity is governed by per-region, per-family quota that must be requested and approved, so a training plan can be blocked by an administrative ticket rather than by budget, and the newest accelerators are often unavailable in the region your data is required to stay in.
- The v2 Python SDK and command line use a different object model from v1 and code, pipelines and examples written for v1 do not port mechanically, which has left teams maintaining two ways of doing the same thing and searching documentation that mixes both.
- The workspace binds storage, key vault, container registry and compute together, so recreating or moving one is not a light operation, and configuring it properly with private endpoints and a managed virtual network is a multi-day job for somebody who already knows Azure networking.
- Experiment history, registered models, environments, endpoints and pipeline definitions live inside the workspace, and although the tracking interface is MLflow-compatible, moving the accumulated lineage and orchestration elsewhere is a rebuild, so the cost of leaving grows every month the team uses it.
Dundas BI
- The published Embedded BI Package starts from about $4,738.70 USD per month billed annually for 8 core capacity
- That figure reflects a limited time 35 percent promotional discount rather than list price
- Licensing is by CPU core capacity rather than by user, so cost scales with server hardware
- Dundas is now part of insightsoftware following acquisition
- The page states that a pricing plan is worked out together with the vendor rather than published as a rate card
Pricing, plan by plan
Azure Machine Learning
Free- Free TierFree
- Limited compute
- Basic features
- Pay-as-you-go$0.05/hour
- Full platform
- All compute options
- Enterprise features
Dundas BI
$500/month- Professional$500/month
- Full Platform
- Embedding
- Support
- EnterpriseFree
- Unlimited Users
- Multi-tenant
- Premium Support
Which should you pick?
Choose Azure Machine Learning if
- You need workspace.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Azure Cloud.
- You also want compute clusters.
Choose Dundas BI if
- You need white-labeling.
- You work on Web, Embedded, Mobile.
- You also want embedded analytics.
Questions people ask
- Is Azure Machine Learning or Dundas BI better?
- Neither clearly leads. Azure Machine Learning starts at Free and Dundas BI at $500/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Azure Machine Learning or Dundas BI?
- Azure Machine Learning has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Azure Machine Learning and $500/month for Dundas BI.
- Does Azure Machine Learning or Dundas BI run on more platforms?
- Azure Machine Learning runs on Azure Cloud. Dundas BI runs on Web, Embedded, Mobile.
- Can I use Azure Machine Learning for free?
- Yes. Azure Machine Learning has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Dundas BI starts at $500/month.
- What is Azure Machine Learning best used for?
- Azure Machine Learning is most often used for enterprises standardised on azure where using a different cloud for machine learning would mean a fresh security and compliance review, training that needs to burst onto a gpu cluster occasionally without buying hardware, with the cluster scaling back to zero afterwards, regulated workloads that must stay inside a virtual network with private endpoints and auditable role-based access, teams already using mlflow who want the tracking interface they know backed by a managed service and enterprise identity. Of those, enterprises standardised on azure where using a different cloud for machine learning would mean a fresh security and compliance review and training that needs to burst onto a gpu cluster occasionally without buying hardware, with the cluster scaling back to zero afterwards are not what Dundas BI is typically brought in for.
- What can Azure Machine Learning do that Dundas BI cannot?
- Azure Machine Learning covers Workspace, Compute clusters, MLflow-compatible tracking, Model registry. Dundas BI covers White-labeling, Embedded Analytics, Data Preparation, Custom Visualizations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Azure Machine Learning: Is there a charge for the workspace itself?
No charge for the workspace resource. You pay for the compute it runs, the storage it uses, the container registry, key vault and any endpoints left running, which is where essentially the whole bill comes from.
Dundas BI: How much does Dundas BI cost?
Dundas BI does not publish specific pricing. The vendor emphasizes 'smarter licensing models to scale appropriately and achieve ROI rapidly' and offers 'custom plans that fit your needs' rather than standardized tiers. Customers must contact Dundas directly for pricing quotes tailored to their enterprise or embedded analytics use case.
SourceAzure Machine Learning: Does it work with MLflow?
Yes. The tracking interface is MLflow-compatible, so existing logging code generally works unchanged, and that compatibility is the least locked-in part of the platform.
Dundas BI: What licensing options does Dundas BI offer?
Dundas BI describes their approach as flexible licensing designed to scale based on deployment needs. Specific licensing models and per-seat or concurrent-user costs are determined through custom quotes.
SourceAzure Machine Learning: What is the difference between SDK v1 and v2?
A different object model and a different way of expressing jobs, components and endpoints. v2 is the current one. v1 code does not translate mechanically and a lot of material found online still assumes v1, which is a common source of wasted time.
Azure Machine Learning: Do endpoints scale to zero?
Managed online endpoints do not; they hold their virtual machines. Batch endpoints only consume compute while a job runs, so intermittent workloads are much cheaper served as batch where the use case allows it.
Azure Machine Learning: Do I need an ML engineer to run it?
For the data science work, not necessarily. For the workspace itself, yes, somebody has to understand Azure identity, networking, quota and cost management, and on teams without that person the platform becomes the bottleneck rather than the model.
Related pages
More on Azure Machine Learning
Other head to heads
- Azure Machine Learning vs AWS SageMaker
- Azure Machine Learning vs DataRobot
- Azure Machine Learning vs Google Vertex AI
- Azure Machine Learning vs Snowflake
- Azure Machine Learning vs Dataiku
- Azure Machine Learning vs Domino Data Lab
- Azure Machine Learning vs Comet ML
- Azure Machine Learning vs DVC
- Azure Machine Learning vs Kubeflow
- Azure Machine Learning vs Seldon
- Azure Machine Learning vs Databricks
- Azure Machine Learning vs SAS
- Azure Machine Learning vs Anaconda
- Azure Machine Learning vs H2O.ai
- Azure Machine Learning vs Hugging Face
- Azure Machine Learning vs Sisense
- Azure Machine Learning vs MicroStrategy
- Azure Machine Learning vs Power BI
- Azure Machine Learning vs Amazon QuickSight
- Azure Machine Learning vs GoodData
- Azure Machine Learning vs Glassbox
- Azure Machine Learning vs Quantum Metric
- Azure Machine Learning vs SAP BusinessObjects
- Azure Machine Learning vs Anaplan
- Azure Machine Learning vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- Azure Machine Learning vs Cube
- Azure Machine Learning vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- Azure Machine Learning vs Lightdash
- Azure Machine Learning vs Mode
- Azure Machine Learning vs Periscope Data
- Azure Machine Learning vs Zoho Analytics
- Azure Machine Learning vs Baremetrics
- Dundas BI vs AWS SageMaker
- Dundas BI vs DataRobot
- Dundas BI vs Google Vertex AI
- Dundas BI vs Snowflake
- Dundas BI vs Dataiku
- Dundas BI vs Domino Data Lab
- Dundas BI vs Comet ML
- Dundas BI vs DVC
- Dundas BI vs Kubeflow
- Dundas BI vs Seldon
- Dundas BI vs Databricks
- Dundas BI vs SAS
- Dundas BI vs Anaconda
- Dundas BI vs H2O.ai
- Dundas BI vs Hugging Face
- Dundas BI vs Sisense
- Dundas BI vs MicroStrategy
- Dundas BI vs Power BI
- Dundas BI vs Amazon QuickSight
- Dundas BI vs GoodData
- Dundas BI vs Glassbox
- Dundas BI vs Quantum Metric
- Dundas BI vs SAP BusinessObjects
- Dundas BI vs Anaplan
- Dundas BI vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- Dundas BI vs Cube
- Dundas BI vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- Dundas BI vs Lightdash
- Dundas BI vs Mode
- Dundas BI vs Periscope Data
- Dundas BI vs Zoho Analytics
- Dundas BI vs Baremetrics
