Machine Learning · head to head
Azure Machine Learning vs Sisense

Azure Machine Learning
Machine Learning
Microsoft's managed platform for training, tracking and deploying models on Azure
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Azure Machine Learning has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Azure Machine Learning managed online endpoints are billed per underlying virtual machine for as long as the deployment exists, with no scale to zero, so a model answering a handful of requests a day costs the same as one answering thousands.; Sisense pricing lacks transparency with opaque scaling costs and hidden fees for onboarding and training
- They diverge on capability: Azure Machine Learning covers Workspace, Sisense covers Embedded Analytics.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Azure Machine Learning and Sisense actually diverge.
| Attribute | Azure Machine Learning | Sisense |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $10000/year |
| Pricing model | usage-based | Unknown |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Azure Cloud | Web, Cloud, On-premises |
| Category | Machine Learning | Business Intelligence |
| Founded | 1975 | 2004 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Azure Machine Learning
- Workspace
- Compute clusters
- MLflow-compatible tracking
- Model registry
- Managed online endpoints
- Batch endpoints
- Automated machine learning
- Pipelines
Only in Sisense
- Embedded Analytics
- AI/ML Integration
- In-chip Technology
- White-labeling
- REST API
- Snowflake
- AWS
- Azure
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Azure Machine Learning
- Enterprises standardised on Azure where using a different cloud for machine learning would mean a fresh security and compliance reviewnot Sisense
- Training that needs to burst onto a GPU cluster occasionally without buying hardware, with the cluster scaling back to zero afterwardsnot Sisense
- Regulated workloads that must stay inside a virtual network with private endpoints and auditable role-based accessnot Sisense
- Teams already using MLflow who want the tracking interface they know backed by a managed service and enterprise identitynot Sisense
Sisense
- Self-service analyticsnot Azure Machine Learning
- Data explorationnot Azure Machine Learning
- Ad-hoc reportingnot Azure Machine Learning
- Collaborative analysisnot Azure Machine Learning
- Embedded analyticsnot Azure Machine Learning
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Azure Machine Learning
- Managed online endpoints are billed per underlying virtual machine for as long as the deployment exists, with no scale to zero, so a model answering a handful of requests a day costs the same as one answering thousands.
- GPU capacity is governed by per-region, per-family quota that must be requested and approved, so a training plan can be blocked by an administrative ticket rather than by budget, and the newest accelerators are often unavailable in the region your data is required to stay in.
- The v2 Python SDK and command line use a different object model from v1 and code, pipelines and examples written for v1 do not port mechanically, which has left teams maintaining two ways of doing the same thing and searching documentation that mixes both.
- The workspace binds storage, key vault, container registry and compute together, so recreating or moving one is not a light operation, and configuring it properly with private endpoints and a managed virtual network is a multi-day job for somebody who already knows Azure networking.
- Experiment history, registered models, environments, endpoints and pipeline definitions live inside the workspace, and although the tracking interface is MLflow-compatible, moving the accumulated lineage and orchestration elsewhere is a rebuild, so the cost of leaving grows every month the team uses it.
Sisense
- Pricing lacks transparency with opaque scaling costs and hidden fees for onboarding and training
- Limited connector ecosystem compared to competitors; missing native connectors to many data sources
- Dashboard customization options are limited; widgets cannot span multiple rows, restricting layout possibilities
- Performance issues reported with large datasets and stability problems with data cubes
Pricing, plan by plan
Azure Machine Learning
Free- Free TierFree
- Limited compute
- Basic features
- Pay-as-you-go$0.05/hour
- Full platform
- All compute options
- Enterprise features
Sisense
$10000/year- Small Team$10000/year minimum
- Basic analytics dashboards
- Limited data sources
- Mid-Market$undefined/custom
- Advanced analytics
- Multiple data sources
- Custom integrations
- Enterprise$60000/year+
- Advanced AI analytics
- Premium support
- Custom development
Which should you pick?
Choose Azure Machine Learning if
- You need workspace.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Azure Cloud.
- You also want compute clusters.
Choose Sisense if
- You need embedded analytics.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premises.
- You also want ai/ml integration.
Questions people ask
- Is Azure Machine Learning or Sisense better?
- Neither clearly leads. Azure Machine Learning starts at Free and Sisense at $10000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Azure Machine Learning or Sisense?
- Azure Machine Learning has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Azure Machine Learning and $10000/year for Sisense.
- Does Azure Machine Learning or Sisense run on more platforms?
- Azure Machine Learning runs on Azure Cloud. Sisense runs on Web, Cloud, On-premises.
- Can I use Azure Machine Learning for free?
- Yes. Azure Machine Learning has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sisense starts at $10000/year.
- What is Azure Machine Learning best used for?
- Azure Machine Learning is most often used for enterprises standardised on azure where using a different cloud for machine learning would mean a fresh security and compliance review, training that needs to burst onto a gpu cluster occasionally without buying hardware, with the cluster scaling back to zero afterwards, regulated workloads that must stay inside a virtual network with private endpoints and auditable role-based access, teams already using mlflow who want the tracking interface they know backed by a managed service and enterprise identity. Of those, enterprises standardised on azure where using a different cloud for machine learning would mean a fresh security and compliance review and training that needs to burst onto a gpu cluster occasionally without buying hardware, with the cluster scaling back to zero afterwards are not what Sisense is typically brought in for.
- What can Azure Machine Learning do that Sisense cannot?
- Azure Machine Learning covers Workspace, Compute clusters, MLflow-compatible tracking, Model registry. Sisense covers Embedded Analytics, AI/ML Integration, In-chip Technology, White-labeling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Azure Machine Learning: Is there a charge for the workspace itself?
No charge for the workspace resource. You pay for the compute it runs, the storage it uses, the container registry, key vault and any endpoints left running, which is where essentially the whole bill comes from.
Sisense: What is Sisense primarily used for?
Sisense is an embedded analytics platform that combines data ingestion, modeling, and dashboarding, allowing organizations to embed analytics and insights directly into their applications and workflows.
SourceAzure Machine Learning: Does it work with MLflow?
Yes. The tracking interface is MLflow-compatible, so existing logging code generally works unchanged, and that compatibility is the least locked-in part of the platform.
Sisense: Does Sisense have a transparent pricing model?
Sisense pricing is not publicly listed and requires contacting sales. Typical costs start at $10,000 per year for small teams but can scale to $60,000+ annually depending on users, data volume, number of data sources, and complexity. AI capabilities typically add 20-30% to base costs.
SourceAzure Machine Learning: What is the difference between SDK v1 and v2?
A different object model and a different way of expressing jobs, components and endpoints. v2 is the current one. v1 code does not translate mechanically and a lot of material found online still assumes v1, which is a common source of wasted time.
Sisense: What data sources can Sisense connect to?
Sisense provides pre-built connectors for popular applications including Salesforce, Google Analytics, Zendesk, and others. It also supports custom connections through APIs and SDKs for specialized data sources.
SourceAzure Machine Learning: Do endpoints scale to zero?
Managed online endpoints do not; they hold their virtual machines. Batch endpoints only consume compute while a job runs, so intermittent workloads are much cheaper served as batch where the use case allows it.
Sisense: Is Sisense easy to use for non-technical users?
Sisense requires significant technical expertise to set up, particularly for creating Elasticubes (database caches) which often need SQL code. While it promotes codeless reporting, typical implementations require a technical resource.
SourceAzure Machine Learning: Do I need an ML engineer to run it?
For the data science work, not necessarily. For the workspace itself, yes, somebody has to understand Azure identity, networking, quota and cost management, and on teams without that person the platform becomes the bottleneck rather than the model.
Related pages
More on Azure Machine Learning
Other head to heads
- Azure Machine Learning vs AWS SageMaker
- Azure Machine Learning vs DataRobot
- Azure Machine Learning vs Google Vertex AI
- Azure Machine Learning vs Snowflake
- Azure Machine Learning vs Dataiku
- Azure Machine Learning vs Domino Data Lab
- Azure Machine Learning vs Comet ML
- Azure Machine Learning vs DVC
- Azure Machine Learning vs Kubeflow
- Azure Machine Learning vs Seldon
- Azure Machine Learning vs Databricks
- Azure Machine Learning vs SAS
- Azure Machine Learning vs Anaconda
- Azure Machine Learning vs H2O.ai
- Azure Machine Learning vs Hugging Face
- Azure Machine Learning vs Dundas BI
- Azure Machine Learning vs MicroStrategy
- Azure Machine Learning vs GoodData
- Azure Machine Learning vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- Azure Machine Learning vs ThoughtSpot
- Azure Machine Learning vs Qlik Sense
- Azure Machine Learning vs Glassbox
- Azure Machine Learning vs Logi Analytics
- Azure Machine Learning vs Quantum Metric
- Azure Machine Learning vs SAP BusinessObjects
- Azure Machine Learning vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Azure Machine Learning vs Yellowfin
- Azure Machine Learning vs Mode
- Azure Machine Learning vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- Azure Machine Learning vs Zoho Analytics
- Azure Machine Learning vs Baremetrics
- Azure Machine Learning vs Board International
- Azure Machine Learning vs Cabin
- Sisense vs AWS SageMaker
- Sisense vs DataRobot
- Sisense vs Google Vertex AI
- Sisense vs Snowflake
- Sisense vs Dataiku
- Sisense vs Domino Data Lab
- Sisense vs Comet ML
- Sisense vs DVC
- Sisense vs Kubeflow
- Sisense vs Seldon
- Sisense vs Databricks
- Sisense vs SAS
- Sisense vs Anaconda
- Sisense vs H2O.ai
- Sisense vs Hugging Face
- Sisense vs Dundas BI
- Sisense vs MicroStrategy
- Sisense vs GoodData
- Sisense vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- Sisense vs ThoughtSpot
- Sisense vs Qlik Sense
- Sisense vs Glassbox
- Sisense vs Logi Analytics
- Sisense vs Quantum Metric
- Sisense vs SAP BusinessObjects
- Sisense vs TIBCO Spotfire
- Sisense vs Yellowfin
- Sisense vs Mode
- Sisense vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- Sisense vs Zoho Analytics
- Sisense vs Baremetrics
- Sisense vs Board International
- Sisense vs Cabin

