Cloud · head to head
Azure Functions vs Earthly
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Azure Functions consumption plan free grant is capped at 1 million executions and 400,000 GB-seconds of resource consumption per month per subscription, billed per GB-second beyond that; Earthly pricing model not published; requires sales contact
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Azure Functions and Earthly actually diverge.
| Attribute | Azure Functions | Earthly |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | No pricing published on website |
| Platforms | Web | Web, CLI |
| Category | Cloud | Developer Tools |
| Founded | Unknown | 2020 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Azure Functions
Nothing recorded that Earthly does not also cover.
Only in Earthly
- Policy as code
- Multi-stage enforcement
- AI agent governance
- Repository-wide policies
- Incident response automation
- Compliance management
- Earthfiles build tool
- Satellites
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Azure Functions
- Event-driven computingnot Earthly
- Serverless application backendnot Earthly
- Scalable API endpointsnot Earthly
Earthly
- Enforcing engineering standards across AI and human developersnot Azure Functions
- Automating incident response procedures across all repositoriesnot Azure Functions
- Embedding compliance requirements into development workflowsnot Azure Functions
- Standardizing build processes with Earthfilesnot Azure Functions
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Azure Functions
- Consumption plan free grant is capped at 1 million executions and 400,000 GB-seconds of resource consumption per month per subscription, billed per GB-second beyond that
- The newer Flex Consumption plan's free grant is smaller still, at 250,000 executions and 100,000 GB-seconds per month
- Premium plan avoids per-execution charges but bills continuously for allocated core seconds and memory regardless of invocation volume
- Memory is rounded up to the nearest 128 MB and execution time to the nearest 1 ms for billing, so small overages round upward
Earthly
- Pricing model not published; requires sales contact
- Earthly Lunar is a recent launch (2025) with limited track record
- Primarily GitHub-focused; limited integration with other platforms
- No public documentation on pricing or feature tiers
Pricing, plan by plan
Azure Functions
Free- Consumption Plan$null/month
- 1 million requests free monthly
- 400,000 GB-seconds free monthly
- Billed per second and executions
- Flex Consumption Plan$null/month
- 250,000 executions free monthly
- 100,000 GB-seconds free monthly
- Event-driven scaling
- Premium Plan$null/month
- No execution charges
- At least one instance required
- Includes automatic scaling and VNET access
Earthly
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Earthly review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Earthly if
- You need policy as code.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want multi-stage enforcement.
Questions people ask
- Is Azure Functions or Earthly better?
- Neither clearly leads. Azure Functions starts at Free and Earthly at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Azure Functions or Earthly?
- Azure Functions starts at Free and Earthly at Free.
- Does Azure Functions or Earthly run on more platforms?
- Azure Functions runs on Web. Earthly runs on Web, CLI.
- Can I use Azure Functions for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Azure Functions best used for?
- Azure Functions is most often used for event-driven computing, serverless application backend, scalable api endpoints. Of those, event-driven computing and serverless application backend are not what Earthly is typically brought in for.
- What can Azure Functions do that Earthly cannot?
- Earthly covers Policy as code, Multi-stage enforcement, AI agent governance, Repository-wide policies.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Azure Functions: Does Azure Functions have a free tier?
Yes, Azure Functions includes a monthly free grant of 1 million requests and 400,000 GB-seconds on the Consumption Plan, or 250,000 executions and 100,000 GB-seconds on Flex Consumption.
SourceEarthly: What is the difference between Earthfiles and Earthly Lunar?
Earthfiles is an open-source build tool that reached 12,000 GitHub stars and is used by companies like NVIDIA, Intel, and Databricks. Earthly Lunar is a separate governance platform launched in 2025 for enforcing standards across development workflows.
SourceAzure Functions: What is Azure Functions' pricing model?
Azure Functions uses usage-based pricing. Consumption plans charge per second of resource consumption and per execution, measured in gigabyte-seconds and rounded to the nearest 128 MB.
SourceEarthly: How does Earthly Lunar enforce standards?
Lunar converts engineering standards, compliance requirements, and processes documented in AGENTS.md files, wikis, and incident postmortems into enforceable guardrails that apply consistently across repositories and development stages.
SourceAzure Functions: What is the minimum execution time for Azure Functions?
The minimum execution time is 100 milliseconds on Consumption plans. Premium plans charge based on core seconds and allocated memory.
SourceEarthly: What is the pricing for Earthly Lunar?
Pricing is not published on the website. Interested customers should contact Earthly's sales team for current pricing and feature tiers.
SourceRelated pages
More on Azure Functions
Other head to heads
- Azure Functions vs Go
- Azure Functions vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Azure Functions vs Porter
- Azure Functions vs Beam Cloud
- Azure Functions vs Upstash
- Azure Functions vs Oracle Cloud
- Azure Functions vs SST
- Azure Functions vs Tencent Cloud
- Azure Functions vs Terragrunt
- Azure Functions vs Neon
- Azure Functions vs Pulumi
- Azure Functions vs Lambda
- Azure Functions vs Linode
- Azure Functions vs Longhorn
- Azure Functions vs Northflank
- Azure Functions vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Azure Functions vs minikube
- Azure Functions vs OpenTelemetry
- Azure Functions vs Spacelift
- Azure Functions vs Dagger
- Azure Functions vs Nixpacks
- Azure Functions vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Azure Functions vs OpsLevel
- Azure Functions vs Namespace
- Azure Functions vs Depot
- Azure Functions vs Blacksmith
- Azure Functions vs WarpBuild
- Azure Functions vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Azure Functions vs Garden
- Azure Functions vs Nx Cloud
- Azure Functions vs Cody
- Azure Functions vs ConfigCat
- Azure Functions vs Cortex
- Azure Functions vs Deep Code
- Azure Functions vs Deno
- Earthly vs Go
- Earthly vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Earthly vs Porter
- Earthly vs Beam Cloud
- Earthly vs Upstash
- Earthly vs Oracle Cloud
- Earthly vs SST
- Earthly vs Tencent Cloud
- Earthly vs Terragrunt
- Earthly vs Neon
- Earthly vs Pulumi
- Earthly vs Lambda
- Earthly vs Linode
- Earthly vs Longhorn
- Earthly vs Northflank
- Earthly vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Earthly vs minikube
- Earthly vs OpenTelemetry
- Earthly vs Spacelift
- Earthly vs Dagger
- Earthly vs Nixpacks
- Earthly vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Earthly vs OpsLevel
- Earthly vs Namespace
- Earthly vs Depot
- Earthly vs Blacksmith
- Earthly vs WarpBuild
- Earthly vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Earthly vs Garden
- Earthly vs Nx Cloud
- Earthly vs Cody
- Earthly vs ConfigCat
- Earthly vs Cortex
- Earthly vs Deep Code
- Earthly vs Deno


