Cloud · head to head
Azure Functions vs Caddy
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Azure Functions consumption plan free grant is capped at 1 million executions and 400,000 GB-seconds of resource consumption per month per subscription, billed per GB-second beyond that; Caddy smaller ecosystem than Nginx, so third-party guides and modules are fewer
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Azure Functions and Caddy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Azure Functions | Caddy |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Azure Functions
Nothing recorded that Caddy does not also cover.
Only in Caddy
- Automatic HTTPS
- Caddyfile
- Reverse proxy
- Single binary
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Azure Functions
- Event-driven computingnot Caddy
- Serverless application backendnot Caddy
- Scalable API endpointsnot Caddy
Caddy
- Sites and services where expired certificates have caused outages beforenot Azure Functions
- Small deployments where Nginx configuration is more effort than the problem warrantsnot Azure Functions
- Reverse proxying internal services with TLS without a certificate workflownot Azure Functions
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Azure Functions
- Consumption plan free grant is capped at 1 million executions and 400,000 GB-seconds of resource consumption per month per subscription, billed per GB-second beyond that
- The newer Flex Consumption plan's free grant is smaller still, at 250,000 executions and 100,000 GB-seconds per month
- Premium plan avoids per-execution charges but bills continuously for allocated core seconds and memory regardless of invocation volume
- Memory is rounded up to the nearest 128 MB and execution time to the nearest 1 ms for billing, so small overages round upward
Caddy
- Smaller ecosystem than Nginx, so third-party guides and modules are fewer
- Adding plugins means rebuilding the binary rather than loading a module
- Under very high throughput Nginx generally still benchmarks ahead
- Automatic certificate issuance needs outbound internet access, which complicates air-gapped deployments
Pricing, plan by plan
Azure Functions
Free- Consumption Plan$null/month
- 1 million requests free monthly
- 400,000 GB-seconds free monthly
- Billed per second and executions
- Flex Consumption Plan$null/month
- 250,000 executions free monthly
- 100,000 GB-seconds free monthly
- Event-driven scaling
- Premium Plan$null/month
- No execution charges
- At least one instance required
- Includes automatic scaling and VNET access
Caddy
Free- CaddyFree
- Full functionality
- Commercial use permitted
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Caddy if
- You need automatic https.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want caddyfile.
Questions people ask
- Is Azure Functions or Caddy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Azure Functions starts at Free and Caddy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Azure Functions or Caddy?
- Azure Functions starts at Free and Caddy at Free.
- Does Azure Functions or Caddy run on more platforms?
- Azure Functions runs on Web. Caddy runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Azure Functions for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Azure Functions best used for?
- Azure Functions is most often used for event-driven computing, serverless application backend, scalable api endpoints. Of those, event-driven computing and serverless application backend are not what Caddy is typically brought in for.
- What can Azure Functions do that Caddy cannot?
- Caddy covers Automatic HTTPS, Caddyfile, Reverse proxy, Single binary.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Azure Functions: Does Azure Functions have a free tier?
Yes, Azure Functions includes a monthly free grant of 1 million requests and 400,000 GB-seconds on the Consumption Plan, or 250,000 executions and 100,000 GB-seconds on Flex Consumption.
SourceCaddy: Is Caddy free?
Yes, open source under the Apache 2.0 licence, free for commercial use.
Azure Functions: What is Azure Functions' pricing model?
Azure Functions uses usage-based pricing. Consumption plans charge per second of resource consumption and per execution, measured in gigabyte-seconds and rounded to the nearest 128 MB.
SourceCaddy: What does automatic HTTPS mean?
Caddy obtains certificates from Let’s Encrypt or ZeroSSL on first request and renews them before expiry, with no cron job or configuration.
Azure Functions: What is the minimum execution time for Azure Functions?
The minimum execution time is 100 milliseconds on Consumption plans. Premium plans charge based on core seconds and allocated memory.
SourceCaddy: Caddy or Nginx?
Caddy is dramatically simpler to configure and removes certificate management. Nginx has the larger ecosystem and better peak throughput.
Related pages
More on Azure Functions
Other head to heads
- Azure Functions vs Go
- Azure Functions vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Azure Functions vs Porter
- Azure Functions vs Beam Cloud
- Azure Functions vs Upstash
- Azure Functions vs Oracle Cloud
- Azure Functions vs SST
- Azure Functions vs Tencent Cloud
- Azure Functions vs Terragrunt
- Azure Functions vs Neon
- Azure Functions vs Pulumi
- Azure Functions vs Lambda
- Azure Functions vs Linode
- Azure Functions vs Longhorn
- Azure Functions vs Northflank
- Azure Functions vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Azure Functions vs minikube
- Azure Functions vs OpenTelemetry
- Azure Functions vs HAProxy
- Azure Functions vs Packer
- Azure Functions vs Portworx
- Azure Functions vs Podman
- Azure Functions vs Rancher
- Azure Functions vs Flux
- Azure Functions vs Contabo
- Azure Functions vs Coolify
- Azure Functions vs Crossplane
- Azure Functions vs Dokku
- Azure Functions vs Encore
- Azure Functions vs Vagrant
- Azure Functions vs Buildah
- Azure Functions vs Kustomize
- Azure Functions vs Skopeo
- Azure Functions vs containerd
- Caddy vs Go
- Caddy vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Caddy vs Porter
- Caddy vs Beam Cloud
- Caddy vs Upstash
- Caddy vs Oracle Cloud
- Caddy vs SST
- Caddy vs Tencent Cloud
- Caddy vs Terragrunt
- Caddy vs Neon
- Caddy vs Pulumi
- Caddy vs Lambda
- Caddy vs Linode
- Caddy vs Longhorn
- Caddy vs Northflank
- Caddy vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Caddy vs minikube
- Caddy vs OpenTelemetry
- Caddy vs HAProxy
- Caddy vs Packer
- Caddy vs Portworx
- Caddy vs Podman
- Caddy vs Rancher
- Caddy vs Flux
- Caddy vs Contabo
- Caddy vs Coolify
- Caddy vs Crossplane
- Caddy vs Dokku
- Caddy vs Encore
- Caddy vs Vagrant
- Caddy vs Buildah
- Caddy vs Kustomize
- Caddy vs Skopeo
- Caddy vs containerd


