Cloud · head to head
Azure Functions vs Dokku

Dokku
Cloud
Single-server platform that accepts a git push and runs Heroku buildpacks on Docker
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Azure Functions consumption plan free grant is capped at 1 million executions and 400,000 GB-seconds of resource consumption per month per subscription, billed per GB-second beyond that; Dokku one maintainer accounts for nearly all human commit activity and the project records roughly 10,500 US dollars of annual income on Open Collective, which is not enough to fund a maintainer, so continuity rests on one person continuing to volunteer.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Azure Functions and Dokku actually diverge.
| Attribute | Azure Functions | Dokku |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Azure Functions
Nothing recorded that Dokku does not also cover.
Only in Dokku
- Git push deploy
- Heroku buildpacks
- Datastore plugins
- Automatic certificates
- Zero downtime deploys
- Pluggable schedulers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Azure Functions
- Event-driven computingnot Dokku
- Serverless application backendnot Dokku
- Scalable API endpointsnot Dokku
Dokku
- Running a dozen side projects and client applications on one virtual private server with Heroku style deploymentnot Azure Functions
- Moving off a managed platform when the monthly bill has grown faster than the traffic hasnot Azure Functions
- A consultancy that wants buildpack deployments without teaching every client team Kubernetesnot Azure Functions
- Keeping a legacy Procfile application alive on hardware you control after a managed platform deprecates its stacknot Azure Functions
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Azure Functions
- Consumption plan free grant is capped at 1 million executions and 400,000 GB-seconds of resource consumption per month per subscription, billed per GB-second beyond that
- The newer Flex Consumption plan's free grant is smaller still, at 250,000 executions and 100,000 GB-seconds per month
- Premium plan avoids per-execution charges but bills continuously for allocated core seconds and memory regardless of invocation volume
- Memory is rounded up to the nearest 128 MB and execution time to the nearest 1 ms for billing, so small overages round upward
Dokku
- One maintainer accounts for nearly all human commit activity and the project records roughly 10,500 US dollars of annual income on Open Collective, which is not enough to fund a maintainer, so continuity rests on one person continuing to volunteer.
- Dokku Pro asks 849 US dollars for a lifetime licence from a project with no disclosed legal entity behind the promise and no published refund terms, while the product is still described as in development at early bird pricing.
- Dokku is single-server by design, and the k3s scheduler that provides multi-node support is missing log retrieval, process inspection and content-based health checks, with a post-run hook the documentation says does not consistently fire.
- Supported operating systems are limited to Ubuntu 22.04 or 24.04 and Debian 11 or later, so organisations standardised on Red Hat, Rocky or Alma Linux cannot run it on their approved base image.
- Backups are separate commands per datastore plugin that you schedule yourself, with no unified snapshot, no point-in-time recovery and no tested restore path, so verifying that a restore works is entirely your responsibility.
Pricing, plan by plan
Azure Functions
Free- Consumption Plan$null/month
- 1 million requests free monthly
- 400,000 GB-seconds free monthly
- Billed per second and executions
- Flex Consumption Plan$null/month
- 250,000 executions free monthly
- 100,000 GB-seconds free monthly
- Event-driven scaling
- Premium Plan$null/month
- No execution charges
- At least one instance required
- Includes automatic scaling and VNET access
Dokku
Free- DokkuFree
- MIT licensed, no usage limits
- Command line and SSH only
- All datastore and certificate plugins
- Dokku Pro$849/one-time
- Lifetime licence with free upgrades and no subscription
- Covers 1 production and 2 pre-production servers
- Web dashboard and JSON REST API
Which should you pick?
Choose Dokku if
- You need git push deploy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted.
- You also want heroku buildpacks.
Questions people ask
- Is Azure Functions or Dokku better?
- Neither clearly leads. Azure Functions starts at Free and Dokku at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Azure Functions or Dokku?
- Azure Functions starts at Free and Dokku at Free.
- Does Azure Functions or Dokku run on more platforms?
- Azure Functions runs on Web. Dokku runs on Linux, Docker, CLI, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Azure Functions for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Azure Functions best used for?
- Azure Functions is most often used for event-driven computing, serverless application backend, scalable api endpoints. Of those, event-driven computing and serverless application backend are not what Dokku is typically brought in for.
- What can Azure Functions do that Dokku cannot?
- Dokku covers Git push deploy, Heroku buildpacks, Datastore plugins, Automatic certificates.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Azure Functions: Does Azure Functions have a free tier?
Yes, Azure Functions includes a monthly free grant of 1 million requests and 400,000 GB-seconds on the Consumption Plan, or 250,000 executions and 100,000 GB-seconds on Flex Consumption.
SourceDokku: Is Dokku still maintained?
Yes. Version 0.38.27 shipped in August 2026 with roughly six releases in the preceding two months. The caveat is that one maintainer writes nearly all of it.
Azure Functions: What is Azure Functions' pricing model?
Azure Functions uses usage-based pricing. Consumption plans charge per second of resource consumption and per execution, measured in gigabyte-seconds and rounded to the nearest 128 MB.
SourceDokku: What does Dokku Pro give me over the free edition?
A web dashboard, a JSON REST API, git push over HTTPS, browser log tailing, team management and email support from the maintainers. It costs 849 US dollars once for one production and two pre-production servers.
Azure Functions: What is the minimum execution time for Azure Functions?
The minimum execution time is 100 milliseconds on Consumption plans. Premium plans charge based on core seconds and allocated memory.
SourceDokku: Can Dokku run across multiple servers?
Only through the k3s or Nomad schedulers. The k3s path is missing several commands and health check types, and the older Kubernetes scheduler is deprecated and no longer developed.
Dokku: Will my Heroku application run on it unchanged?
Usually. Dokku runs the same buildpacks and reads a Procfile, so the application layer normally moves across. Add-ons, scaling behaviour and backups are the parts you have to rebuild.
Related pages
More on Azure Functions
Other head to heads
- Azure Functions vs Go
- Azure Functions vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Azure Functions vs Porter
- Azure Functions vs Beam Cloud
- Azure Functions vs Upstash
- Azure Functions vs Oracle Cloud
- Azure Functions vs SST
- Azure Functions vs Tencent Cloud
- Azure Functions vs Terragrunt
- Azure Functions vs Neon
- Azure Functions vs Pulumi
- Azure Functions vs Lambda
- Azure Functions vs Linode
- Azure Functions vs Longhorn
- Azure Functions vs Northflank
- Azure Functions vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Azure Functions vs minikube
- Azure Functions vs OpenTelemetry
- Azure Functions vs Fly.io
- Azure Functions vs Render
- Azure Functions vs Heroku
- Azure Functions vs Coolify
- Azure Functions vs CapRover
- Azure Functions vs Qovery
- Azure Functions vs Railway
- Azure Functions vs Podman
- Azure Functions vs Portworx
- Azure Functions vs Scaleway
- Azure Functions vs Skopeo
- Dokku vs Go
- Dokku vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Dokku vs Porter
- Dokku vs Beam Cloud
- Dokku vs Upstash
- Dokku vs Oracle Cloud
- Dokku vs SST
- Dokku vs Tencent Cloud
- Dokku vs Terragrunt
- Dokku vs Neon
- Dokku vs Pulumi
- Dokku vs Lambda
- Dokku vs Linode
- Dokku vs Longhorn
- Dokku vs Northflank
- Dokku vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Dokku vs minikube
- Dokku vs OpenTelemetry
- Dokku vs Fly.io
- Dokku vs Render
- Dokku vs Heroku
- Dokku vs Coolify
- Dokku vs CapRover
- Dokku vs Qovery
- Dokku vs Railway
- Dokku vs Podman
- Dokku vs Portworx
- Dokku vs Scaleway
- Dokku vs Skopeo

