Cloud · head to head
Beam Cloud vs Caddy

Beam Cloud
Cloud
Serverless GPU computing with sub-second cold starts and multi-cloud support
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Beam Cloud free tier limited to $30 monthly credits with 5 GPU containers; Caddy smaller ecosystem than Nginx, so third-party guides and modules are fewer
- They diverge on capability: Beam Cloud covers Sub-second cold starts, Caddy covers Automatic HTTPS.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Beam Cloud and Caddy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Beam Cloud | Caddy |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium with pay-per-millisecond usage charges | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Cloud, Python | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Beam Cloud
- Sub-second cold starts
- Inference endpoints
- Task queues
- Sandboxes
- Multi-cloud support
- Python SDK
- Global distribution
- Massive parallelization
Only in Caddy
- Automatic HTTPS
- Caddyfile
- Reverse proxy
- Single binary
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Beam Cloud
- Deploying ML models with minimal latency and setup timenot Caddy
- Large-scale batch processing across thousands of concurrent tasksnot Caddy
- Cost-effective inference serving with bursty workloadsnot Caddy
- Multi-cloud AI deployments with global low-latency accessnot Caddy
- Serverless AI development for rapid experimentationnot Caddy
Caddy
- Sites and services where expired certificates have caused outages beforenot Beam Cloud
- Small deployments where Nginx configuration is more effort than the problem warrantsnot Beam Cloud
- Reverse proxying internal services with TLS without a certificate workflownot Beam Cloud
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Beam Cloud
- Free tier limited to $30 monthly credits with 5 GPU containers
- Massive parallelization complexity may require DevOps expertise
- Per-millisecond pricing model requires careful cost monitoring
- Smaller team relative to established cloud providers
Caddy
- Smaller ecosystem than Nginx, so third-party guides and modules are fewer
- Adding plugins means rebuilding the binary rather than loading a module
- Under very high throughput Nginx generally still benchmarks ahead
- Automatic certificate issuance needs outbound internet access, which complicates air-gapped deployments
Pricing, plan by plan
Beam Cloud
Free- DeveloperFree
- $30 monthly free credits
- 5 GPU containers, 30 CPU containers
- Community support
- Team$89/month
- $30 monthly free credits included
- 50 GPU containers, 1,000 CPU containers
- 3 seats included, $25 per additional
- Growth$undefined/custom
- 1,000+ GPU containers
- Unlimited CPU containers
- Unlimited seats
- Serverless GPUs$undefined/per-millisecond
- RTX 4090: $0.00019/sec
Caddy
Free- CaddyFree
- Full functionality
- Commercial use permitted
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Beam Cloud if
- You need sub-second cold starts.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Python.
- You also want inference endpoints.
Choose Caddy if
- You need automatic https.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want caddyfile.
Questions people ask
- Is Beam Cloud or Caddy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Beam Cloud starts at Free and Caddy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Beam Cloud or Caddy?
- Beam Cloud starts at Free and Caddy at Free.
- Does Beam Cloud or Caddy run on more platforms?
- Beam Cloud runs on Cloud, Python. Caddy runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Beam Cloud for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Beam Cloud best used for?
- Beam Cloud is most often used for deploying ml models with minimal latency and setup time, large-scale batch processing across thousands of concurrent tasks, cost-effective inference serving with bursty workloads, multi-cloud ai deployments with global low-latency access. Of those, deploying ml models with minimal latency and setup time and large-scale batch processing across thousands of concurrent tasks are not what Caddy is typically brought in for.
- What can Beam Cloud do that Caddy cannot?
- Beam Cloud covers Sub-second cold starts, Inference endpoints, Task queues, Sandboxes. Caddy covers Automatic HTTPS, Caddyfile, Reverse proxy, Single binary.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Beam Cloud: What is included in the Developer plan?
The Developer plan includes $30 monthly free credits, 5 GPU containers, 30 CPU containers, and community support. No upfront commitment is required.
SourceCaddy: Is Caddy free?
Yes, open source under the Apache 2.0 licence, free for commercial use.
Beam Cloud: How fast are the cold starts?
Beam Cloud achieves sub-second cold starts through memory snapshots that restore GPU containers 35x faster than traditional cold boots.
SourceCaddy: What does automatic HTTPS mean?
Caddy obtains certificates from Let’s Encrypt or ZeroSSL on first request and renews them before expiry, with no cron job or configuration.
Beam Cloud: Can I deploy across multiple cloud providers?
Yes, Beam Cloud supports multi-cloud deployment across AWS, GCP, Azure, Hetzner, and other providers with 30+ global regions available.
SourceCaddy: Caddy or Nginx?
Caddy is dramatically simpler to configure and removes certificate management. Nginx has the larger ecosystem and better peak throughput.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Beam Cloud vs Cerebrium
- Beam Cloud vs Lambda
- Beam Cloud vs Upstash
- Beam Cloud vs Neon
- Beam Cloud vs Koyeb
- Beam Cloud vs Fly.io
- Beam Cloud vs Rancher
- Beam Cloud vs Deno Deploy
- Beam Cloud vs Serverless Framework
- Beam Cloud vs Render
- Beam Cloud vs Railway
- Beam Cloud vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Beam Cloud vs Akamai
- Beam Cloud vs Alibaba Cloud
- Beam Cloud vs Buildah
- Beam Cloud vs CapRover
- Beam Cloud vs Chef
- Beam Cloud vs Cilium
- Beam Cloud vs HAProxy
- Beam Cloud vs Packer
- Beam Cloud vs Pulumi
- Beam Cloud vs Portworx
- Beam Cloud vs Podman
- Beam Cloud vs Porter
- Beam Cloud vs Flux
- Beam Cloud vs Contabo
- Beam Cloud vs Coolify
- Beam Cloud vs Crossplane
- Beam Cloud vs Dokku
- Beam Cloud vs Encore
- Beam Cloud vs Vagrant
- Beam Cloud vs Kustomize
- Beam Cloud vs Skopeo
- Beam Cloud vs containerd
- Caddy vs Cerebrium
- Caddy vs Lambda
- Caddy vs Upstash
- Caddy vs Neon
- Caddy vs Koyeb
- Caddy vs Fly.io
- Caddy vs Rancher
- Caddy vs Deno Deploy
- Caddy vs Serverless Framework
- Caddy vs Render
- Caddy vs Railway
- Caddy vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Caddy vs Akamai
- Caddy vs Alibaba Cloud
- Caddy vs Buildah
- Caddy vs CapRover
- Caddy vs Chef
- Caddy vs Cilium
- Caddy vs HAProxy
- Caddy vs Packer
- Caddy vs Pulumi
- Caddy vs Portworx
- Caddy vs Podman
- Caddy vs Porter
- Caddy vs Flux
- Caddy vs Contabo
- Caddy vs Coolify
- Caddy vs Crossplane
- Caddy vs Dokku
- Caddy vs Encore
- Caddy vs Vagrant
- Caddy vs Kustomize
- Caddy vs Skopeo
- Caddy vs containerd

