Cloud · head to head
AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs CosmosDB

CosmosDB
Databases
Globally distributed, multi-model database service from Azure
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: AWS (Amazon Web Services) data transfer in is free and data transfer out is charged, which is the standard source of unexpected bills; CosmosDB autoscale provisioned throughput enforces a minimum of 1,000 RU/s, billed hourly whether or not the database is used
- They diverge on capability: AWS (Amazon Web Services) covers EC2 - Virtual Servers, CosmosDB covers Global Distribution.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AWS (Amazon Web Services) and CosmosDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | AWS (Amazon Web Services) | CosmosDB |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Api, Cli, Mobile | Web, Azure |
| Category | Cloud | Databases |
| Founded | 2006 | 1975 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (usage-based), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- EC2 - Virtual Servers
- S3 - Object Storage
- RDS - Managed Database
- Lambda - Serverless Computing
- CloudFront - CDN
- VPC - Virtual Network
- IAM - Access Management
- CloudWatch - Monitoring
Only in CosmosDB
- Global Distribution
- Multi-model APIs
- Elastic Scaling
- Five Consistency Levels
- SLA-backed Latency
- Automatic Indexing
- Serverless
- Azure Functions
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Web hostingnot CosmosDB
- Data storagenot CosmosDB
- Machine learningnot CosmosDB
- Big data analyticsnot CosmosDB
- Application developmentnot CosmosDB
CosmosDB
- Running a globally distributed multi model database on Azurenot AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Serving low latency reads and writes from multiple Azure regionsnot AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Storing document, key value and graph data behind a managed servicenot AWS (Amazon Web Services)
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Data transfer in is free and data transfer out is charged, which is the standard source of unexpected bills
- Discounts require one or three year Savings Plan commitments rather than being automatic
- Every service is priced separately, so a working architecture has no single published cost
- The free tier is a promotional allowance rather than an ongoing free plan
CosmosDB
- Autoscale provisioned throughput enforces a minimum of 1,000 RU/s, billed hourly whether or not the database is used
- Provisioned throughput is charged in every region the account is replicated to, so multi region accounts multiply the RU bill
- Storage charges cover data, indexes and backups in each replicated region
- Egress out of Azure and between regions is charged, though ingress is free
- The free allowance is one account per Azure subscription, limited to 1,000 RU/s and 25 GB
- RU/s rates vary by region and are only shown through the pricing calculator rather than a flat published rate
Pricing, plan by plan
AWS (Amazon Web Services)
Free- AWS Free TierFree
- EC2 750 hours/month
- 5GB S3 storage
- 20GB data transfer
- Pay-As-You-GoFree
- No upfront payment
- No long-term commitments
- Pay only for what you use
CosmosDB
Free- Free TierFree
- 1000 RU/s
- 25GB storage
- First 12 months
- ServerlessFree
- Pay per request
- Auto-scaling
- Event-driven workloads
Which should you pick?
Choose AWS (Amazon Web Services) if
- You need ec2 - virtual servers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli, Mobile.
- You also want s3 - object storage.
Choose CosmosDB if
- You need global distribution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Azure.
- You also want multi-model apis.
Questions people ask
- Is AWS (Amazon Web Services) or CosmosDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. AWS (Amazon Web Services) starts at Free and CosmosDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AWS (Amazon Web Services) or CosmosDB?
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) starts at Free and CosmosDB at Free.
- Does AWS (Amazon Web Services) or CosmosDB run on more platforms?
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) runs on Web, Api, Cli, Mobile. CosmosDB runs on Web, Azure.
- Can I use AWS (Amazon Web Services) for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is AWS (Amazon Web Services) best used for?
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) is most often used for web hosting, data storage, machine learning, big data analytics. Of those, web hosting and data storage are not what CosmosDB is typically brought in for.
- What can AWS (Amazon Web Services) do that CosmosDB cannot?
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) covers EC2 - Virtual Servers, S3 - Object Storage, RDS - Managed Database, Lambda - Serverless Computing. CosmosDB covers Global Distribution, Multi-model APIs, Elastic Scaling, Five Consistency Levels.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
AWS (Amazon Web Services): What are AWS's payment options and pricing models?
AWS offers four pricing approaches: pay-as-you-go (you pay only for what you use), flat-rate plans combining multiple services into one monthly price without overages, Savings Plans offering discounts on compute and machine learning with 1- or 3-year commitments, and volume-based tiered pricing where costs decrease as usage increases.
SourceCosmosDB: Is there a free tier for Azure Cosmos DB?
Yes, Cosmos DB offers a free tier with 1,000 RU/s of throughput and 25 GB of storage per month for the lifetime of the account, available to new accounts.
SourceAWS (Amazon Web Services): Are there contracts, termination fees, or commitments required for AWS?
No long-term contracts are required for AWS services. No termination fees apply once you stop using the service. Savings Plans provide optional 1- or 3-year commitments with discounted hourly rates, but you can revert to pay-as-you-go pricing anytime.
SourceCosmosDB: How is Cosmos DB priced after the free tier?
Cosmos DB uses three billing models: provisioned throughput billed per request unit per second, vCore pricing for certain APIs, or serverless consumption pricing where you pay only for requests processed. Reserved capacity offers 20% discount for one year or 30% for three years.
SourceAWS (Amazon Web Services): Does AWS offer a free tier?
AWS provides a free tier that offers hands-on experience with AWS products at no charge. The free tier allows new customers to try eligible services before committing to paid usage.
SourceCosmosDB: Can I change my pricing model after choosing one?
No. Once you select a compute pricing model and API, they cannot be changed. This choice is permanent for that database.
SourceAWS (Amazon Web Services): How do I estimate my AWS costs?
AWS provides the AWS Pricing Calculator and Cost Explorer tool to estimate costs for single or multiple services. AWS also offers cost optimization recommendations, performance reporting, and budget alerts to help track and control spending.
SourceCosmosDB: Is there a trial period for Cosmos DB beyond the free tier?
Azure offers a 30-day free trial account for all Azure services. Additionally, Azure AI customers may be eligible for a 90-day free Cosmos DB subscription through the Azure AI Advantage program.
SourceRelated pages
More on AWS (Amazon Web Services)
Other head to heads
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Google Cloud Platform
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Microsoft Azure
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Oracle Cloud
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Vultr
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Wasabi
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Linode
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Hetzner Cloud
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Neon
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Scaleway
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Akamai
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs OVHcloud
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs DigitalOcean
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Fireworks AI
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Heroku
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Vault
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Beam Cloud
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Caddy
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Cerebrium
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Amazon Aurora
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Cockroach Labs
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Airtable
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs PostgreSQL
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Google Cloud SQL
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs ArangoDB
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs DataStax
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs FaunaDB
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Firebolt
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs turbopuffer
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs VerneMQ
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Vespa
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Xata
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs YugabyteDB
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Zilliz
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Amazon Redshift
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs BigQuery
- AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs Amazon RDS
- CosmosDB vs Google Cloud Platform
- CosmosDB vs Microsoft Azure
- CosmosDB vs Oracle Cloud
- CosmosDB vs Vultr
- CosmosDB vs Wasabi
- CosmosDB vs Linode
- CosmosDB vs Hetzner Cloud
- CosmosDB vs Neon
- CosmosDB vs Scaleway
- CosmosDB vs Akamai
- CosmosDB vs OVHcloud
- CosmosDB vs DigitalOcean
- CosmosDB vs Fireworks AI
- CosmosDB vs Heroku
- CosmosDB vs Vault
- CosmosDB vs Beam Cloud
- CosmosDB vs Caddy
- CosmosDB vs Cerebrium
- CosmosDB vs Amazon Aurora
- CosmosDB vs Cockroach Labs
- CosmosDB vs Airtable
- CosmosDB vs PostgreSQL
- CosmosDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- CosmosDB vs ArangoDB
- CosmosDB vs DataStax
- CosmosDB vs FaunaDB
- CosmosDB vs Firebolt
- CosmosDB vs turbopuffer
- CosmosDB vs VerneMQ
- CosmosDB vs Vespa
- CosmosDB vs Xata
- CosmosDB vs YugabyteDB
- CosmosDB vs Zilliz
- CosmosDB vs Amazon Redshift
- CosmosDB vs BigQuery
- CosmosDB vs Amazon RDS

