Networking · head to head
Auvik vs OpenWrt

Auvik
Networking
Cloud-based network monitoring and management priced by managed device count, quote-only
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

OpenWrt
Operating Systems
Linux firmware replacement for routers and embedded network devices, with a package manager and writable filesystem
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenWrt has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Auvik no pricing is published anywhere on the site; every number requires submitting a lead form and speaking to sales, which slows down basic vendor comparison; OpenWrt support is per device and per hardware revision, so a model number that worked last year may point at a different chipset this year and be unsupported.
- They diverge on capability: Auvik covers Automated network mapping, OpenWrt covers Package manager.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Auvik and OpenWrt actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Auvik
- Automated network mapping
- Configuration backup
- Multi-tenant MSP view
- Traffic insight
- Device-based billing with exclusions
Only in OpenWrt
- Package manager
- LuCI web interface
- Traffic shaping
- VPN and DNS
- VLAN and multi-network
- OpenWrt One
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Auvik
- An MSP wanting a single SaaS platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregationnot OpenWrt
- An internal IT team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselvesnot OpenWrt
- A network team wanting continuous, automatically updated network topology mapping rather than maintaining diagrams manuallynot OpenWrt
- An organisation wanting traffic visibility by application without deploying a separate flow collectornot OpenWrt
OpenWrt
- Extending the useful life of an ISP-supplied router that has stopped receiving security updatesnot Auvik
- Separating guest, IoT and work devices onto VLANs on hardware that does not offer it nativelynot Auvik
- Running WireGuard, ad blocking or DNS over TLS at the edge rather than configuring every clientnot Auvik
- Building small industrial or retail gateways where a full Linux distribution is too heavynot Auvik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Auvik
- No pricing is published anywhere on the site; every number requires submitting a lead form and speaking to sales, which slows down basic vendor comparison
- Billing by managed device count means the total cost is not knowable in advance without first running an accurate device count against Auvik's specific inclusion and exclusion rules
- As a SaaS-only product with no on-premises option, an organisation loses monitoring visibility if its own internet connection to Auvik's cloud goes down at the same time as the incident it needs to diagnose
- MSP-focused multi-tenant packaging may include features an internal IT team monitoring only its own network does not need, while still pricing against that broader feature set
- Configuration backup and restore depend on Auvik correctly supporting the specific hardware models on a given network; less common vendors may have thinner support
- Volume discounts exist but are also not published, so an MSP scaling client count has no way to model margin impact before negotiating each contract renewal
OpenWrt
- Support is per device and per hardware revision, so a model number that worked last year may point at a different chipset this year and be unsupported.
- Flashing can brick a device permanently, and on hardware without a serial console or a recovery bootloader there is no way back.
- Devices with 4MB or 8MB of flash have been dropped from recent releases, so a lot of older hardware is stuck on unsupported versions with known vulnerabilities.
- Hardware acceleration for NAT and routing depends on vendor drivers, and enabling traffic shaping frequently cuts a gigabit connection to a fraction of its rated throughput.
- A sysupgrade keeps your configuration but not your installed packages, so every release upgrade is followed by reinstalling and reconfiguring add-ons by hand.
Pricing, plan by plan
Auvik
On request- Auvik$undefined/month
- Automated network mapping
- Configuration backup
- MSP multi-tenant packages available
OpenWrt
Free- OpenWrtFree
- No licence fee for any device count
- All packages from the official feeds
- Community support via forum and wiki
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenWrt if
- You need package manager.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Routers, Access points, x86-64, ARM, MIPS, Embedded gateways.
- You also want luci web interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Auvik or OpenWrt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Auvik starts at On request and OpenWrt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Auvik or OpenWrt?
- OpenWrt has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Auvik and Free for OpenWrt.
- Does Auvik or OpenWrt run on more platforms?
- Auvik runs on Web. OpenWrt runs on Routers, Access points, x86-64, ARM, MIPS, Embedded gateways.
- Can I use OpenWrt for free?
- Yes. OpenWrt has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Auvik starts at On request.
- What is Auvik best used for?
- Auvik is most often used for an msp wanting a single saas platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregation, an internal it team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselves, a network team wanting continuous, automatically updated network topology mapping rather than maintaining diagrams manually, an organisation wanting traffic visibility by application without deploying a separate flow collector. Of those, an msp wanting a single saas platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregation and an internal it team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselves are not what OpenWrt is typically brought in for.
- What can Auvik do that OpenWrt cannot?
- Auvik covers Automated network mapping, Configuration backup, Multi-tenant MSP view, Traffic insight. OpenWrt covers Package manager, LuCI web interface, Traffic shaping, VPN and DNS.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Auvik: Is Auvik priced per network or per device?
Per device, according to Auvik's own FAQ; some device categories like access points and printers are monitored at no additional charge.
OpenWrt: How do I know my router is supported?
Check the Table of Hardware for your exact model and revision before buying or flashing. Do not assume that a supported model number means a supported unit; manufacturers change chipsets within a model.
Auvik: Is there any published price?
No, all pricing is quote-only through a sales conversation.
OpenWrt: Is the OpenWrt One worth buying over a used router?
If you are evaluating OpenWrt rather than rescuing hardware you own, yes. It is supported by definition, has an unbrickable boot arrangement, and part of the price funds the project.
Auvik: Does Auvik require an on-premises server?
No, it is SaaS-delivered with a lightweight local collector rather than a full on-premises monitoring server.
OpenWrt: Will flashing void my warranty?
Almost always, and it may also break the ISP remote management your provider relies on for support. Keep the stock firmware image before you start.
OpenWrt: Is opkg still the package manager?
It is in the current stable releases, but development has moved towards apk, so expect package tooling and command syntax to change at the next major release.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Auvik vs Domotz
- Auvik vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Auvik vs LibreNMS
- Auvik vs Kentik
- Auvik vs Zabbix
- Auvik vs ThousandEyes
- Auvik vs Icinga
- Auvik vs OpenVPN
- Auvik vs Consul
- Auvik vs Tailscale
- Auvik vs Cisco Meraki
- Auvik vs HiveMQ
- Auvik vs Traefik
- Auvik vs ZeroTier
- Auvik vs Juniper Mist
- Auvik vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Auvik vs Nebula
- Auvik vs ngrok
- Auvik vs Debian
- Auvik vs Alpine Linux
- Auvik vs FreeBSD
- Auvik vs NixOS
- Auvik vs Arch Linux
- Auvik vs AlmaLinux
- Auvik vs openSUSE
- Auvik vs Ubuntu
- Auvik vs Fedora
- Auvik vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux
- Auvik vs Linux Mint
- Auvik vs Manjaro
- Auvik vs Pop!_OS
- Auvik vs Qubes OS
- Auvik vs Rocky Linux
- OpenWrt vs Domotz
- OpenWrt vs PRTG Network Monitor
- OpenWrt vs LibreNMS
- OpenWrt vs Kentik
- OpenWrt vs Zabbix
- OpenWrt vs ThousandEyes
- OpenWrt vs Icinga
- OpenWrt vs OpenVPN
- OpenWrt vs Consul
- OpenWrt vs Tailscale
- OpenWrt vs Cisco Meraki
- OpenWrt vs HiveMQ
- OpenWrt vs Traefik
- OpenWrt vs ZeroTier
- OpenWrt vs Juniper Mist
- OpenWrt vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- OpenWrt vs Nebula
- OpenWrt vs ngrok
- OpenWrt vs Debian
- OpenWrt vs Alpine Linux
- OpenWrt vs FreeBSD
- OpenWrt vs NixOS
- OpenWrt vs Arch Linux
- OpenWrt vs AlmaLinux
- OpenWrt vs openSUSE
- OpenWrt vs Ubuntu
- OpenWrt vs Fedora
- OpenWrt vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux
- OpenWrt vs Linux Mint
- OpenWrt vs Manjaro
- OpenWrt vs Pop!_OS
- OpenWrt vs Qubes OS
- OpenWrt vs Rocky Linux
