AI · head to head
AutoGen vs Windmill

Windmill
Automation Integration
Open-source developer platform for building scripts, workflows, and internal apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: AutoGen framework now in maintenance mode, no new features planned; Windmill free self-hosted tier caps SSO users at 10 and workspaces at 3, requiring Enterprise for larger teams.
- They diverge on capability: AutoGen covers Multi-agent orchestration, Windmill covers Script-to-workflow engine.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AutoGen and Windmill actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AutoGen
- Multi-agent orchestration
- Message passing API
- AgentChat API
- Extensions API
- MCP server support
- AutoGen Studio
- Cross-language support
- Observable agent networks
Only in Windmill
- Script-to-workflow engine
- Auto-generated UIs
- Self-hosted deployment
- Git sync
- SSO support
- Audit logs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AutoGen
- Building multi-agent conversational systemsnot Windmill
- Rapid prototyping of agent applicationsnot Windmill
- Research on agentic AI patterns and architecturesnot Windmill
- Distributed agent networks across boundariesnot Windmill
Windmill
- Turning ad-hoc scripts into scheduled jobs and APIsnot AutoGen
- Building internal tools from existing Python/TypeScript codenot AutoGen
- Self-hosted automation for engineering teamsnot AutoGen
- Orchestrating multi-language workflowsnot AutoGen
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AutoGen
- Framework now in maintenance mode, no new features planned
- Steeper learning curve for advanced use cases
- Microsoft recommends new projects use Agent Framework instead
- Limited to Python and .NET platforms
Windmill
- Free self-hosted tier caps SSO users at 10 and workspaces at 3, requiring Enterprise for larger teams.
- Compute unit and seat-based pricing (developer vs. operator seats, worker compute units) adds pricing complexity beyond a flat monthly fee.
- Email triggers are capped at 100/day on the free tier, limiting event-driven use cases without upgrading.
- Smaller ecosystem of pre-built integrations compared to more established automation tools like n8n.
Pricing, plan by plan
AutoGen
Free- Open SourceFree
- MIT and CC-BY-4.0 licenses
- Full framework access
- Community support
Windmill
Free- Free / Open-sourceFree
- Unlimited executions
- Self-hosted deployment
- Max 10 users with SSO
- Enterprise$120/month
- Unlimited executions and workspaces
- Uncapped SSO seats
- 24/7 priority support (3-hour response)
Which should you pick?
Choose AutoGen if
- You need multi-agent orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Python, .NET.
- You also want message passing api.
Choose Windmill if
- You need script-to-workflow engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- You also want auto-generated uis.
Questions people ask
- Is AutoGen or Windmill better?
- Neither clearly leads. AutoGen starts at Free and Windmill at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AutoGen or Windmill?
- AutoGen starts at Free and Windmill at Free.
- Does AutoGen or Windmill run on more platforms?
- AutoGen runs on Python, .NET. Windmill runs on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- Can I use AutoGen for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is AutoGen best used for?
- AutoGen is most often used for building multi-agent conversational systems, rapid prototyping of agent applications, research on agentic ai patterns and architectures, distributed agent networks across boundaries. Of those, building multi-agent conversational systems and rapid prototyping of agent applications are not what Windmill is typically brought in for.
- What can AutoGen do that Windmill cannot?
- AutoGen covers Multi-agent orchestration, Message passing API, AgentChat API, Extensions API. Windmill covers Script-to-workflow engine, Auto-generated UIs, Self-hosted deployment, Git sync.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
AutoGen: Is AutoGen still actively developed?
As of March 2026, AutoGen is in maintenance mode and will not receive new features. Microsoft recommends new projects use the Microsoft Agent Framework instead.
SourceWindmill: What does Windmill cost?
Windmill's Free and Open-source edition is $0/month for self-hosted use with unlimited executions, while Enterprise starts at $120/month with unlimited workspaces and uncapped SSO seats, priced further by developer/operator seats and compute units.
SourceAutoGen: Can I still use AutoGen for new projects?
While AutoGen is stable and maintained for existing projects, Microsoft recommends using the Microsoft Agent Framework for new development.
SourceWindmill: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
The free self-hosted plan supports unlimited executions but caps SSO at 10 users, workspaces at 3, groups/permissions at 4, and email triggers at 100 per day.
SourceAutoGen: What LLM providers does AutoGen support?
AutoGen includes extensions for OpenAI and Azure OpenAI through its Extensions API, with community support for other providers.
SourceWindmill: How is usage metered on Windmill Enterprise?
Enterprise usage is metered through seats (developer seats at $20/month, operator seats at $10/month) and compute units, e.g. $100/month for 2 standard-worker compute units.
SourceWindmill: What happens to a self-hosted Windmill deployment if the company shuts down?
The pricing page addresses this directly as an FAQ topic, noting that self-hosted applications built on the open-source edition can continue running independently of Windmill the company.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- AutoGen vs LangGraph
- AutoGen vs Aider
- AutoGen vs Together AI
- AutoGen vs Stable Diffusion
- AutoGen vs Helicone
- AutoGen vs Manus
- AutoGen vs Gumloop
- AutoGen vs Poolside
- AutoGen vs Writer
- AutoGen vs Deepgram
- AutoGen vs Black Forest Labs
- AutoGen vs Cartesia
- AutoGen vs Sourcegraph Cody
- AutoGen vs Tabnine
- AutoGen vs Verbit
- AutoGen vs Wordtune
- AutoGen vs Adobe Firefly
- AutoGen vs Amazon Q Developer
- AutoGen vs n8n
- AutoGen vs Nango
- AutoGen vs Airbyte
- AutoGen vs Flowable
- AutoGen vs Meltano
- AutoGen vs RudderStack
- AutoGen vs Grouparoo
- AutoGen vs Activiti
- AutoGen vs jBPM
- AutoGen vs Merge
- AutoGen vs Camunda
- AutoGen vs Flowise
- AutoGen vs Automate.io
- AutoGen vs Autonoly
- AutoGen vs Boomi
- AutoGen vs Browser Use
- AutoGen vs Browserbase
- Windmill vs LangGraph
- Windmill vs Aider
- Windmill vs Together AI
- Windmill vs Stable Diffusion
- Windmill vs Helicone
- Windmill vs Manus
- Windmill vs Gumloop
- Windmill vs Poolside
- Windmill vs Writer
- Windmill vs Deepgram
- Windmill vs Black Forest Labs
- Windmill vs Cartesia
- Windmill vs Sourcegraph Cody
- Windmill vs Tabnine
- Windmill vs Verbit
- Windmill vs Wordtune
- Windmill vs Adobe Firefly
- Windmill vs Amazon Q Developer
- Windmill vs n8n
- Windmill vs Nango
- Windmill vs Airbyte
- Windmill vs Flowable
- Windmill vs Meltano
- Windmill vs RudderStack
- Windmill vs Grouparoo
- Windmill vs Activiti
- Windmill vs jBPM
- Windmill vs Merge
- Windmill vs Camunda
- Windmill vs Flowise
- Windmill vs Automate.io
- Windmill vs Autonoly
- Windmill vs Boomi
- Windmill vs Browser Use
- Windmill vs Browserbase

