Technology · head to head
Auth0 vs Transmit Security

Transmit Security
Cybersecurity
Customer identity platform built around passwordless and fraud signals
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Auth0 has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Auth0 free tier limited to 25,000 monthly active users, requiring upgrade for growth beyond that; Transmit Security pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- They diverge on capability: Auth0 covers Universal login, Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Auth0 and Transmit Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | Auth0 | Transmit Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Unknown | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Category | Technology | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2013 | Unknown |
Identical on both: platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Auth0
- Universal login
- Social login
- Multi-factor authentication
- Passwordless
- User management
- Anomaly detection
- Extensibility
- Machine to machine
Only in Transmit Security
- Passwordless authentication
- Detection and response
- Identity verification
- Orchestration
- Account recovery
- Bot and automation detection
- Composable APIs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Auth0
- B2C authenticationnot Transmit Security
- B2B authenticationnot Transmit Security
- B2E authenticationnot Transmit Security
- API securitynot Transmit Security
- Mobile app securitynot Transmit Security
Transmit Security
- A bank moving a consumer base off passwords to passkeys without losing customers at the migration stepnot Auth0
- An insurer whose account recovery flow is the main account takeover route and needs risk scoring inside itnot Auth0
- A retailer that wants bot detection at login rather than only at checkoutnot Auth0
- An organisation replacing an in-house customer login system that has become an unfunded engineering liabilitynot Auth0
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Auth0
- Free tier limited to 25,000 monthly active users, requiring upgrade for growth beyond that
- Advanced features like MFA and RBAC only available on paid Essentials tier and above
- Ownership by Okta introduces risk that independent product roadmap may change
Transmit Security
- Pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- Migrating a live consumer identity base is a high risk project, and credential migration constraints mean some users must re-register, which shows up as measurable churn.
- The vendor is smaller than the identity incumbents, so the partner and systems integrator pool is thinner and staffing a large programme is harder.
- Workforce identity is not the focus, so an organisation wanting one vendor for employees and customers will still run two platforms.
- The fraud detection value depends on traffic volume feeding the models, so a smaller deployment gets less benefit from exactly the capability that justified choosing it over a plain identity provider.
Pricing, plan by plan
Auth0
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 25,000 monthly active users
- Basic authentication
- Email/password login
- Essentials (B2C)$35/month
- Unlimited MAUs beyond free tier
- Multi-Factor Authentication
- Role-Based Access Control
- Professional (B2C)$240/month
- All Essentials features
- Advanced security
- Custom branding
Transmit Security
On request- Transmit Security Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per monthly active user or per transaction by service
- Services licensed individually or as a platform
- Free developer tier for evaluation
Which should you pick?
Choose Auth0 if
- You need universal login.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want social login.
Choose Transmit Security if
- You need passwordless authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want detection and response.
Questions people ask
- Is Auth0 or Transmit Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. Auth0 starts at Free and Transmit Security at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Auth0 or Transmit Security?
- Auth0 has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Auth0 and On request for Transmit Security.
- Does Auth0 or Transmit Security run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Auth0 for free?
- Yes. Auth0 has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Transmit Security starts at On request.
- What is Auth0 best used for?
- Auth0 is most often used for b2c authentication, b2b authentication, b2e authentication, api security. Of those, b2c authentication and b2b authentication are not what Transmit Security is typically brought in for.
- What can Auth0 do that Transmit Security cannot?
- Auth0 covers Universal login, Social login, Multi-factor authentication, Passwordless. Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication, Detection and response, Identity verification, Orchestration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Auth0: How much does Auth0 cost?
Auth0 has a Free tier for up to 25,000 monthly active users (MAUs). Paid plans start at $35/month (Essentials B2C) and scale to $240/month (Professional B2C) and higher for Enterprise. Pricing scales with MAU usage.
SourceTransmit Security: Do we have to replace our existing identity provider?
No. The services are composable, so detection and response or verification can be adopted alongside an existing provider such as Okta or Entra ID.
Auth0: Does Auth0 include Multi-Factor Authentication?
No. MFA, RBAC (Role-Based Access Control), and premium support are not included in the free tier and require upgrading to paid Essentials plans or higher.
SourceTransmit Security: Is fraud detection an extra licence?
It is a separate service, but it is designed to run inside the authentication flow rather than as a bolted-on second vendor. Confirm which services are in your quote.
Auth0: Is Auth0 independent or part of a larger company?
Auth0 was acquired by Okta in May 2021 for $6.5 billion. It now operates as a subsidiary business unit within Okta, but maintains its own brand and operations.
SourceTransmit Security: Is there a way to try it?
Yes, a free developer tier exists for evaluation, though production use is an enterprise agreement.
Auth0: Who should use Auth0 vs Okta?
Auth0 is developer-focused and serves customer identity use cases (B2C). Okta serves workforce identity (B2B) and has broader enterprise features. Auth0 now serves both markets post-acquisition but maintains its developer-friendly positioning.
SourceRelated pages
More on Transmit Security
Other head to heads
- Auth0 vs Dashlane
- Auth0 vs GitLab
- Auth0 vs PostHog
- Auth0 vs Datadog
- Auth0 vs LaunchDarkly
- Auth0 vs LogRocket
- Auth0 vs Postman
- Auth0 vs Jira
- Auth0 vs Sentry
- Auth0 vs Eclipse
- Auth0 vs Docker
- Auth0 vs Supabase
- Auth0 vs Istio
- Auth0 vs Lovable
- Auth0 vs Lucidchart
- Auth0 vs MongoDB
- Auth0 vs Nagios XI
- Auth0 vs MongoDB Atlas
- Auth0 vs Descope
- Auth0 vs NICE Actimize
- Auth0 vs Beyond Identity
- Auth0 vs Sardine
- Auth0 vs Feedzai
- Auth0 vs Socure
- Auth0 vs Unit21
- Auth0 vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Auth0 vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Auth0 vs Ping Identity
- Auth0 vs Stytch
- Auth0 vs Rhombus Systems
- Auth0 vs Semgrep
- Auth0 vs Spot AI
- Auth0 vs Syft
- Auth0 vs ThetaRay
- Auth0 vs Trivy
- Auth0 vs Trulioo
- Transmit Security vs Dashlane
- Transmit Security vs GitLab
- Transmit Security vs PostHog
- Transmit Security vs Datadog
- Transmit Security vs LaunchDarkly
- Transmit Security vs LogRocket
- Transmit Security vs Postman
- Transmit Security vs Jira
- Transmit Security vs Sentry
- Transmit Security vs Eclipse
- Transmit Security vs Docker
- Transmit Security vs Supabase
- Transmit Security vs Istio
- Transmit Security vs Lovable
- Transmit Security vs Lucidchart
- Transmit Security vs MongoDB
- Transmit Security vs Nagios XI
- Transmit Security vs MongoDB Atlas
- Transmit Security vs Descope
- Transmit Security vs NICE Actimize
- Transmit Security vs Beyond Identity
- Transmit Security vs Sardine
- Transmit Security vs Feedzai
- Transmit Security vs Socure
- Transmit Security vs Unit21
- Transmit Security vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Transmit Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Transmit Security vs Ping Identity
- Transmit Security vs Stytch
- Transmit Security vs Rhombus Systems
- Transmit Security vs Semgrep
- Transmit Security vs Spot AI
- Transmit Security vs Syft
- Transmit Security vs ThetaRay
- Transmit Security vs Trivy
- Transmit Security vs Trulioo

