Technology · head to head
Auth0 vs Lithic

Lithic
APIs
API-first card issuing platform with direct Visa, Mastercard and Amex network connections
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Auth0 has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Auth0 free tier limited to 25,000 monthly active users, requiring upgrade for growth beyond that; Lithic pricing is entirely undisclosed, so a company cannot compare total cost against Marqeta, Galileo or Highnote without a sales conversation.
- They diverge on capability: Auth0 covers Universal login, Lithic covers Direct network connections.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Auth0 and Lithic actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Auth0
- Universal login
- Social login
- Multi-factor authentication
- Passwordless
- User management
- Anomaly detection
- Extensibility
- Machine to machine
Only in Lithic
- Direct network connections
- Processor Client mode
- Lithic Program Management
- Card lifecycle APIs
- Sandbox environment
- Real-time authorization controls
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Auth0
- B2C authenticationnot Lithic
- B2B authenticationnot Lithic
- B2E authenticationnot Lithic
- API securitynot Lithic
- Mobile app securitynot Lithic
Lithic
- A fintech wanting direct Visa or Mastercard network access rather than routing through a third-party processornot Auth0
- A company that already holds its own issuing licence and wants API access without full programme managementnot Auth0
- A neobank or expense platform wanting Lithic to manage bank and network relationships end to endnot Auth0
- A product team prototyping a card programme in sandbox before committing to a launchnot Auth0
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Auth0
- Free tier limited to 25,000 monthly active users, requiring upgrade for growth beyond that
- Advanced features like MFA and RBAC only available on paid Essentials tier and above
- Ownership by Okta introduces risk that independent product roadmap may change
Lithic
- Pricing is entirely undisclosed, so a company cannot compare total cost against Marqeta, Galileo or Highnote without a sales conversation.
- Choosing Processor Client mode still leaves the company responsible for holding its own issuing licence and managing the regulatory relationship, which is a substantial undertaking many teams underestimate.
- As with any card infrastructure provider, an outage or network issue at Lithic becomes a direct outage for every card programme built on it, and a customer has limited visibility into root cause during an incident.
- Building a card programme on API infrastructure requires real engineering investment; it is not a plug-and-play product for a non-technical team.
- Switching card infrastructure providers after launch is a major undertaking involving card reissuance and programme migration, so the initial choice carries lasting lock-in.
Pricing, plan by plan
Auth0
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 25,000 monthly active users
- Basic authentication
- Email/password login
- Essentials (B2C)$35/month
- Unlimited MAUs beyond free tier
- Multi-Factor Authentication
- Role-Based Access Control
- Professional (B2C)$240/month
- All Essentials features
- Advanced security
- Custom branding
Lithic
On request- Lithic$undefined/year
- Volume and interchange-based pricing, not published
- Separate Processor Client and Program Management pricing tracks
- Custom quote required via sales
Which should you pick?
Choose Auth0 if
- You need universal login.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want social login.
Choose Lithic if
- You need direct network connections.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want processor client mode.
Questions people ask
- Is Auth0 or Lithic better?
- Neither clearly leads. Auth0 starts at Free and Lithic at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Auth0 or Lithic?
- Auth0 has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Auth0 and On request for Lithic.
- Does Auth0 or Lithic run on more platforms?
- Auth0 runs on Web, iOS, Android. Lithic runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Auth0 for free?
- Yes. Auth0 has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Lithic starts at On request.
- What is Auth0 best used for?
- Auth0 is most often used for b2c authentication, b2b authentication, b2e authentication, api security. Of those, b2c authentication and b2b authentication are not what Lithic is typically brought in for.
- What can Auth0 do that Lithic cannot?
- Auth0 covers Universal login, Social login, Multi-factor authentication, Passwordless. Lithic covers Direct network connections, Processor Client mode, Lithic Program Management, Card lifecycle APIs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Auth0: How much does Auth0 cost?
Auth0 has a Free tier for up to 25,000 monthly active users (MAUs). Paid plans start at $35/month (Essentials B2C) and scale to $240/month (Professional B2C) and higher for Enterprise. Pricing scales with MAU usage.
SourceLithic: Does Lithic publish pricing?
No, pricing is volume-based and requires a sales conversation.
Auth0: Does Auth0 include Multi-Factor Authentication?
No. MFA, RBAC (Role-Based Access Control), and premium support are not included in the free tier and require upgrading to paid Essentials plans or higher.
SourceLithic: What is the difference between Processor Client and Program Management?
Processor Client suits companies with their own issuing licence and bank relationships; Program Management is for companies wanting Lithic to coordinate those relationships on their behalf.
Auth0: Is Auth0 independent or part of a larger company?
Auth0 was acquired by Okta in May 2021 for $6.5 billion. It now operates as a subsidiary business unit within Okta, but maintains its own brand and operations.
SourceLithic: Which networks does it connect to?
Visa, Mastercard and American Express directly.
Auth0: Who should use Auth0 vs Okta?
Auth0 is developer-focused and serves customer identity use cases (B2C). Okta serves workforce identity (B2B) and has broader enterprise features. Auth0 now serves both markets post-acquisition but maintains its developer-friendly positioning.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Auth0 vs Dashlane
- Auth0 vs GitLab
- Auth0 vs PostHog
- Auth0 vs Datadog
- Auth0 vs LaunchDarkly
- Auth0 vs LogRocket
- Auth0 vs Postman
- Auth0 vs Jira
- Auth0 vs Sentry
- Auth0 vs Eclipse
- Auth0 vs Docker
- Auth0 vs Supabase
- Auth0 vs Istio
- Auth0 vs Lovable
- Auth0 vs Lucidchart
- Auth0 vs MongoDB
- Auth0 vs Nagios XI
- Auth0 vs MongoDB Atlas
- Auth0 vs Thredd
- Auth0 vs Tribe Payments
- Auth0 vs Unit
- Auth0 vs Highnote
- Auth0 vs Vodeno
- Auth0 vs Swan
- Auth0 vs Treasury Prime
- Auth0 vs Marqeta
- Auth0 vs Synctera
- Auth0 vs Weavr
- Auth0 vs Increase
- Auth0 vs i2c
- Auth0 vs Brite Payments
- Auth0 vs Bruno
- Auth0 vs Bud Financial
- Auth0 vs Episode Six
- Auth0 vs Kong Gateway
- Lithic vs Dashlane
- Lithic vs GitLab
- Lithic vs PostHog
- Lithic vs Datadog
- Lithic vs LaunchDarkly
- Lithic vs LogRocket
- Lithic vs Postman
- Lithic vs Jira
- Lithic vs Sentry
- Lithic vs Eclipse
- Lithic vs Docker
- Lithic vs Supabase
- Lithic vs Istio
- Lithic vs Lovable
- Lithic vs Lucidchart
- Lithic vs MongoDB
- Lithic vs Nagios XI
- Lithic vs MongoDB Atlas
- Lithic vs Thredd
- Lithic vs Tribe Payments
- Lithic vs Unit
- Lithic vs Highnote
- Lithic vs Vodeno
- Lithic vs Swan
- Lithic vs Treasury Prime
- Lithic vs Marqeta
- Lithic vs Synctera
- Lithic vs Weavr
- Lithic vs Increase
- Lithic vs i2c
- Lithic vs Brite Payments
- Lithic vs Bruno
- Lithic vs Bud Financial
- Lithic vs Episode Six
- Lithic vs Kong Gateway

