Softwr

Web Development · head to head

Astro vs Frappe

Astro logo

Astro

Web Development

Web framework for content-driven sites shipping minimal JavaScript by default

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Full reviewWebsite
Frappe logo

Frappe

Developer Tools

The Python web framework behind ERPNext, sold as managed hosting through Frappe Cloud

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Astro limited to static site generation and server-side rendering; real-time applications requiring constant client-server communication are unsuitable; Frappe the framework is strongly opinionated: its own ORM, templating and job queue mean general Python and Django experience transfers only partly, and onboarding a new developer takes weeks rather than days.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Astro and Frappe actually diverge.

Attributes where Astro and Frappe differ
AttributeAstroFrappe
Pricing modelopen-sourcePer month by site or server
PlatformsWeb, Node.js, Cloudflare, Vercel, Netlify, AWS, DenoWeb, Linux, Docker
CategoryWeb DevelopmentDeveloper Tools

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Astro

Nothing recorded that Frappe does not also cover.

Only in Frappe

  • DocType modelling
  • Role and field permissions
  • Built-in REST API
  • Background jobs
  • Bench CLI
  • Frappe Cloud hosting
  • App marketplace
  • Multi-tenancy

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Astro

  • Marketing websites and landing pages prioritising performance and SEOnot Frappe
  • Documentation and blog platforms with high page volumesnot Frappe
  • E-commerce storefronts where page speed affects conversion ratesnot Frappe
  • Portfolio and personal websites showcasing static content with minimal interactivitynot Frappe
  • Multi-language sites requiring efficient content management and translationnot Frappe
  • JAMstack projects integrating headless CMS platforms (Contentful, Sanity, Strapi)not Frappe

Frappe

  • A team building an internal business application that needs permissions, audit trail and an API on day one rather than in month threenot Astro
  • An ERPNext user who wants managed hosting, automatic updates and offsite backups without hiring a systems administratornot Astro
  • An Indian or emerging-market business that wants to pay for application hosting in local currency at local price pointsnot Astro
  • A consultancy shipping custom vertical apps to clients on a shared framework with per-client site isolationnot Astro

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Astro

  • Limited to static site generation and server-side rendering; real-time applications requiring constant client-server communication are unsuitable
  • Smaller ecosystem compared to Next.js; fewer third-party component libraries and integrations readily available
  • Build time increases with large content volumes (1,000+ pages); incremental builds not yet as optimised as Gatsby or Next.js
  • API routes and serverless functions are less mature than Next.js; complex backend integrations require additional tooling

Frappe

  • The framework is strongly opinionated: its own ORM, templating and job queue mean general Python and Django experience transfers only partly, and onboarding a new developer takes weeks rather than days.
  • The developer pool is small and heavily concentrated in India, so hiring Frappe experience elsewhere is slow and expensive relative to mainstream stacks.
  • Documentation is uneven in depth and lags behind releases in places, so real answers often come from reading the source or the community forum.
  • Major version upgrades of the framework have historically broken custom apps that reach past the DocType layer, so bespoke code carries a recurring maintenance cost at each upgrade.
  • Frappe Cloud recommends against its cheapest Hetzner-backed option for mission-critical production, so the headline $5 entry price is not the price of a production-grade deployment.

Pricing, plan by plan

Astro

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Astro review.

Frappe

Free
  • Framework, self-hostedFree
    • MIT licensed, no licence fee
    • Install with bench on your own Linux servers
    • You carry updates, backups and security patching
  • Frappe Cloud Sites$5/month
    • Also listed at ₹410 per month
    • Shared servers with 150+ installable apps
    • Automatic updates and offsite backups
  • Frappe Cloud Servers$40/month
    • Also listed at ₹3,600 per month
    • Dedicated or shared virtual machines
    • Unlimited sites on your server

Which should you pick?

Choose Astro if

  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Node.js, Cloudflare, Vercel, Netlify, AWS, Deno.
Astro review

Choose Frappe if

  • You need doctype modelling.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Linux, Docker.
  • You also want role and field permissions.
Frappe review

Questions people ask

Is Astro or Frappe better?
Neither clearly leads. Astro starts at Free and Frappe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Astro or Frappe?
Astro starts at Free and Frappe at Free.
Does Astro or Frappe run on more platforms?
Astro runs on Web, Node.js, Cloudflare, Vercel, Netlify, AWS, Deno. Frappe runs on Web, Linux, Docker.
Can I use Astro for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Astro best used for?
Astro is most often used for marketing websites and landing pages prioritising performance and seo, documentation and blog platforms with high page volumes, e-commerce storefronts where page speed affects conversion rates, portfolio and personal websites showcasing static content with minimal interactivity. Of those, marketing websites and landing pages prioritising performance and seo and documentation and blog platforms with high page volumes are not what Frappe is typically brought in for.
What can Astro do that Frappe cannot?
Frappe covers DocType modelling, Role and field permissions, Built-in REST API, Background jobs.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Astro: Is Astro free?

Yes. Astro is free and open-source under MIT licence. Deployment hosting (Vercel, Netlify, Cloudflare, AWS) may incur costs depending on usage.

Source
Frappe: Is Frappe the same as ERPNext?

No. Frappe is the framework; ERPNext is the ERP application written on it. You can run Frappe without ERPNext to build your own applications.

Astro: Can I use React components in Astro?

Yes. Astro supports React, Vue, Svelte, Preact, and Solid components. Components are server-rendered by default; add client: directives to enable client-side interactivity only where needed.

Source
Frappe: What licence is the framework under?

MIT, which is permissive and imposes no obligation to publish your changes, unlike the AGPL used by several open source ERP rivals.

Astro: How does Astro compare to Next.js for performance?

Astro achieves superior Core Web Vitals scores (66% pass rate vs Next.js 30%) by shipping minimal JavaScript. Next.js defaults to client-side rendering; Astro renders on the server by default.

Source
Frappe: Can I pay in rupees?

Yes. Frappe Cloud publishes the same plans in Indian rupees, ₹410 a month for sites and ₹3,600 for servers, rather than converting a dollar price at checkout.

Frappe: Do I have to use Frappe Cloud?

No, self-hosting with bench or Docker is fully supported and free. Frappe Cloud is a convenience purchase, and it funds the open source work.

Share

Related pages

More on Astro

More on Frappe

Keep looking

Other head to heads