APIs · head to head
Apollo GraphQL vs Token.io

Apollo GraphQL
APIs
GraphQL platform and API orchestration layer for building unified graphs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Token.io
APIs
Account to account pay by bank infrastructure across the UK and Europe
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Apollo GraphQL has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Apollo GraphQL pricing beyond the Developer tier requires contacting sales, making cost comparison harder for mid-size teams.; Token.io account to account payments carry no chargeback scheme, so merchants gain cost savings but consumers lose the dispute protection cards provide, which limits adoption in general retail.
- They diverge on capability: Apollo GraphQL covers Apollo Connectors, Token.io covers Payment initiation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apollo GraphQL and Token.io actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apollo GraphQL | Token.io |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
Identical on both: platforms (web, api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apollo GraphQL
- Apollo Connectors
- GraphOS Router
- Schema registry
- Schema checks
- Response caching
- Audit logging
Only in Token.io
- Payment initiation
- Variable recurring payments
- Bank network coverage
- giroAPI membership
- Payouts and refunds
- Data and account information
- Hosted payment pages
- Reconciliation reporting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apollo GraphQL
- Federating multiple backend services into one GraphQL APInot Token.io
- Wrapping legacy REST APIs for frontend consumptionnot Token.io
- Enterprise API governance with schema checks and audit logsnot Token.io
- Reducing frontend over-fetching and under-fetching of datanot Token.io
Token.io
- A utility or telecom collecting high value bills where card interchange makes acceptance expensivenot Apollo GraphQL
- An investment or trading platform funding customer accounts without card chargeback exposurenot Apollo GraphQL
- A payment service provider adding pay by bank to its merchant proposition without building bank connectivitynot Apollo GraphQL
- A German merchant using giroAPI scheme access for recurring and future dated bank paymentsnot Apollo GraphQL
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apollo GraphQL
- Pricing beyond the Developer tier requires contacting sales, making cost comparison harder for mid-size teams.
- Adopting GraphOS effectively requires buy-in to the GraphQL paradigm, which is a larger architectural shift than adding a REST gateway.
- The free plan's 1-day data retention and 60 req/min self-hosted router limit make it unsuitable for production use.
- Volume-based per-request pricing can become expensive at very high request volumes compared to flat-rate API gateways.
Token.io
- Account to account payments carry no chargeback scheme, so merchants gain cost savings but consumers lose the dispute protection cards provide, which limits adoption in general retail.
- Conversion depends on each bank's own authentication journey, and slow or broken bank redirects cost sales in ways the merchant cannot fix or even always diagnose.
- Variable recurring payments beyond sweeping are still being rolled out unevenly across banks and markets, so a subscription use case may be supported at one bank and not another.
- Token.io initiates payments rather than acting as acquirer of record, so merchants still need settlement, safeguarding and reconciliation arrangements elsewhere.
- Coverage and feature parity vary by country, so a pan European rollout means different capabilities and different bank behaviour in each market rather than one uniform product.
Pricing, plan by plan
Apollo GraphQL
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support
- Developer$5/month
- $5 per million requests with volume discounts
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- Standard$undefined/month
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- 24x7x365 support with SLA
Token.io
On request- Token.io platform$undefined/year
- Quoted per customer, typically per initiated payment
- Volume tiers and monthly minimums are common
- No interchange, so unit cost is usually well below card acceptance
Which should you pick?
Choose Apollo GraphQL if
- You need apollo connectors.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want graphos router.
Choose Token.io if
- You need payment initiation.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want variable recurring payments.
Questions people ask
- Is Apollo GraphQL or Token.io better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apollo GraphQL starts at Free and Token.io at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apollo GraphQL or Token.io?
- Apollo GraphQL has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Apollo GraphQL and On request for Token.io.
- Does Apollo GraphQL or Token.io run on more platforms?
- Apollo GraphQL runs on web, api. Token.io runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Apollo GraphQL for free?
- Yes. Apollo GraphQL has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Token.io starts at On request.
- What is Apollo GraphQL best used for?
- Apollo GraphQL is most often used for federating multiple backend services into one graphql api, wrapping legacy rest apis for frontend consumption, enterprise api governance with schema checks and audit logs, reducing frontend over-fetching and under-fetching of data. Of those, federating multiple backend services into one graphql api and wrapping legacy rest apis for frontend consumption are not what Token.io is typically brought in for.
- What can Apollo GraphQL do that Token.io cannot?
- Apollo GraphQL covers Apollo Connectors, GraphOS Router, Schema registry, Schema checks. Token.io covers Payment initiation, Variable recurring payments, Bank network coverage, giroAPI membership.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apollo GraphQL: What does Apollo GraphQL cost?
The Free plan supports up to 3 developers at no cost. Developer plan starts at $5 per million requests with a $50 signup credit, while Standard and Enterprise require contacting sales for custom pricing.
SourceToken.io: Does pay by bank remove card fees?
It removes interchange and scheme fees, so unit cost is normally far below card acceptance, particularly on high value payments.
Apollo GraphQL: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
Yes, the Free 'Forever Free' plan supports up to 3 developers, 1-day data retention for checks and insights, and a self-hosted router capped at 60 requests per minute.
SourceToken.io: What about chargebacks?
There are none. That is the cost saving and the consumer protection gap, which is why it suits bills, top ups and account funding more than retail.
Apollo GraphQL: How is usage metered on paid plans?
Standard requests are billed per million operations with tiered volume discounts, starting at $5.00/million for the first 250M and dropping to $3.00/million beyond 5B, with similar tiered pricing for subscription update events.
SourceToken.io: Is Token.io regulated?
Yes, it is an authorised third party provider under UK and European open banking rules, but it initiates payments rather than holding merchant funds as an acquirer.
Related pages
More on Apollo GraphQL
Other head to heads
- Apollo GraphQL vs Liveblocks
- Apollo GraphQL vs GraphQL Playground
- Apollo GraphQL vs Hasura
- Apollo GraphQL vs Pusher
- Apollo GraphQL vs Ozone API
- Apollo GraphQL vs WSO2 API Manager
- Apollo GraphQL vs Boomi API Management
- Apollo GraphQL vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Apollo GraphQL vs Ably
- Apollo GraphQL vs Apigee
- Apollo GraphQL vs Lithic
- Apollo GraphQL vs Swan
- Apollo GraphQL vs Method Financial
- Apollo GraphQL vs Neonomics
- Apollo GraphQL vs Payload CMS
- Apollo GraphQL vs Portkey
- Apollo GraphQL vs Prisma
- Apollo GraphQL vs Tink
- Apollo GraphQL vs TrueLayer
- Apollo GraphQL vs Brite Payments
- Apollo GraphQL vs Fintecture
- Apollo GraphQL vs Volt
- Apollo GraphQL vs Trustly
- Apollo GraphQL vs Yapily
- Apollo GraphQL vs Enable Banking
- Apollo GraphQL vs Zimpler
- Apollo GraphQL vs Salt Edge
- Apollo GraphQL vs Tribe Payments
- Apollo GraphQL vs Dwolla
- Apollo GraphQL vs Flybits
- Apollo GraphQL vs i2c
- Apollo GraphQL vs KeystoneJS
- Apollo GraphQL vs Kong
- Token.io vs Liveblocks
- Token.io vs GraphQL Playground
- Token.io vs Hasura
- Token.io vs Pusher
- Token.io vs Ozone API
- Token.io vs WSO2 API Manager
- Token.io vs Boomi API Management
- Token.io vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Token.io vs Ably
- Token.io vs Apigee
- Token.io vs Lithic
- Token.io vs Swan
- Token.io vs Method Financial
- Token.io vs Neonomics
- Token.io vs Payload CMS
- Token.io vs Portkey
- Token.io vs Prisma
- Token.io vs Tink
- Token.io vs TrueLayer
- Token.io vs Brite Payments
- Token.io vs Fintecture
- Token.io vs Volt
- Token.io vs Trustly
- Token.io vs Yapily
- Token.io vs Enable Banking
- Token.io vs Zimpler
- Token.io vs Salt Edge
- Token.io vs Tribe Payments
- Token.io vs Dwolla
- Token.io vs Flybits
- Token.io vs i2c
- Token.io vs KeystoneJS
- Token.io vs Kong
