APIs · head to head
LiteLLM vs Lithic

Lithic
APIs
API-first card issuing platform with direct Visa, Mastercard and Amex network connections
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only LiteLLM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: LiteLLM enterprise pricing based on annual request capacity and deployment architecture, sized via direct sales; Lithic pricing is entirely undisclosed, so a company cannot compare total cost against Marqeta, Galileo or Highnote without a sales conversation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which LiteLLM and Lithic actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in LiteLLM
Nothing recorded that Lithic does not also cover.
Only in Lithic
- Direct network connections
- Processor Client mode
- Lithic Program Management
- Card lifecycle APIs
- Sandbox environment
- Real-time authorization controls
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
LiteLLM
- Accessing 140+ LLM providers through single APInot Lithic
- Implementing cost-based routing for advanced AI tasksnot Lithic
- Deploying new LLM models usually within a daynot Lithic
- Switching backend models with config changes onlynot Lithic
- Maintaining consistent access across 100+ endpointsnot Lithic
Lithic
- A fintech wanting direct Visa or Mastercard network access rather than routing through a third-party processornot LiteLLM
- A company that already holds its own issuing licence and wants API access without full programme managementnot LiteLLM
- A neobank or expense platform wanting Lithic to manage bank and network relationships end to endnot LiteLLM
- A product team prototyping a card programme in sandbox before committing to a launchnot LiteLLM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
LiteLLM
- Enterprise pricing based on annual request capacity and deployment architecture, sized via direct sales
- Not per-token based pricing for Enterprise tier
Lithic
- Pricing is entirely undisclosed, so a company cannot compare total cost against Marqeta, Galileo or Highnote without a sales conversation.
- Choosing Processor Client mode still leaves the company responsible for holding its own issuing licence and managing the regulatory relationship, which is a substantial undertaking many teams underestimate.
- As with any card infrastructure provider, an outage or network issue at Lithic becomes a direct outage for every card programme built on it, and a customer has limited visibility into root cause during an incident.
- Building a card programme on API infrastructure requires real engineering investment; it is not a plug-and-play product for a non-technical team.
- Switching card infrastructure providers after launch is a major undertaking involving card reissuance and programme migration, so the initial choice carries lasting lock-in.
Pricing, plan by plan
LiteLLM
Free- Open SourceFree
- 100+ providers
- One OpenAI API
- Virtual keys
- Enterprise$null/mo
- All Open Source features
- SSO + SCIM
- OIDC/JWT authentication
Lithic
On request- Lithic$undefined/year
- Volume and interchange-based pricing, not published
- Separate Processor Client and Program Management pricing tracks
- Custom quote required via sales
Which should you pick?
Choose Lithic if
- You need direct network connections.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want processor client mode.
Questions people ask
- Is LiteLLM or Lithic better?
- Neither clearly leads. LiteLLM starts at Free and Lithic at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, LiteLLM or Lithic?
- LiteLLM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for LiteLLM and On request for Lithic.
- Does LiteLLM or Lithic run on more platforms?
- LiteLLM runs on Web. Lithic runs on Web, API.
- Can I use LiteLLM for free?
- Yes. LiteLLM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Lithic starts at On request.
- What is LiteLLM best used for?
- LiteLLM is most often used for accessing 140+ llm providers through single api, implementing cost-based routing for advanced ai tasks, deploying new llm models usually within a day, switching backend models with config changes only. Of those, accessing 140+ llm providers through single api and implementing cost-based routing for advanced ai tasks are not what Lithic is typically brought in for.
- What can LiteLLM do that Lithic cannot?
- Lithic covers Direct network connections, Processor Client mode, Lithic Program Management, Card lifecycle APIs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
LiteLLM: Is LiteLLM free to use?
Yes, LiteLLM's open-source version is free forever and requires no credit card. Self-host in minutes with support for 100+ LLM providers.
SourceLithic: Does Lithic publish pricing?
No, pricing is volume-based and requires a sales conversation.
LiteLLM: What does LiteLLM's Enterprise plan cost?
Enterprise pricing is custom and annual, sized based on your annual gateway request capacity, deployment architecture, and support needs. Not charged per token.
SourceLithic: What is the difference between Processor Client and Program Management?
Processor Client suits companies with their own issuing licence and bank relationships; Program Management is for companies wanting Lithic to coordinate those relationships on their behalf.
LiteLLM: Is there a free trial for Enterprise?
Yes, a 30-day Enterprise trial key is available via email with no credit card required.
SourceLithic: Which networks does it connect to?
Visa, Mastercard and American Express directly.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- LiteLLM vs Appwrite
- LiteLLM vs Hasura
- LiteLLM vs PocketBase
- LiteLLM vs Sanity
- LiteLLM vs Kong Gateway
- LiteLLM vs Convoy
- LiteLLM vs Tyk
- LiteLLM vs Volt
- LiteLLM vs Formance
- LiteLLM vs Janus Gateway
- LiteLLM vs Portkey
- LiteLLM vs Hoppscotch
- LiteLLM vs HTTPie
- LiteLLM vs Method Financial
- LiteLLM vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- LiteLLM vs Neonomics
- LiteLLM vs Kong
- LiteLLM vs Thredd
- LiteLLM vs Tribe Payments
- LiteLLM vs Unit
- LiteLLM vs Highnote
- LiteLLM vs Vodeno
- LiteLLM vs Swan
- LiteLLM vs Treasury Prime
- LiteLLM vs Marqeta
- LiteLLM vs Synctera
- LiteLLM vs Weavr
- LiteLLM vs Increase
- LiteLLM vs i2c
- LiteLLM vs Brite Payments
- LiteLLM vs Bruno
- LiteLLM vs Bud Financial
- LiteLLM vs Episode Six
- Lithic vs Appwrite
- Lithic vs Hasura
- Lithic vs PocketBase
- Lithic vs Sanity
- Lithic vs Kong Gateway
- Lithic vs Convoy
- Lithic vs Tyk
- Lithic vs Volt
- Lithic vs Formance
- Lithic vs Janus Gateway
- Lithic vs Portkey
- Lithic vs Hoppscotch
- Lithic vs HTTPie
- Lithic vs Method Financial
- Lithic vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Lithic vs Neonomics
- Lithic vs Kong
- Lithic vs Thredd
- Lithic vs Tribe Payments
- Lithic vs Unit
- Lithic vs Highnote
- Lithic vs Vodeno
- Lithic vs Swan
- Lithic vs Treasury Prime
- Lithic vs Marqeta
- Lithic vs Synctera
- Lithic vs Weavr
- Lithic vs Increase
- Lithic vs i2c
- Lithic vs Brite Payments
- Lithic vs Bruno
- Lithic vs Bud Financial
- Lithic vs Episode Six

