Databases · head to head
Apache Pinot vs MySQL

Apache Pinot
Databases
Real-time distributed OLAP datastore for analytics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache Pinot self-hosted and distributed, so running it means operating a cluster rather than consuming a service; MySQL hot online backup is not in the free Community Server; MySQL Enterprise Backup is a paid Enterprise Edition component
- They diverge on capability: Apache Pinot covers Real-time Analytics, MySQL covers ACID compliance.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Pinot and MySQL actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Pinot | MySQL |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | freemium |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes | Windows, Macos, Linux, Unix |
| Category | Databases | Web Development |
| Founded | 1999 | 1995 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Pinot
- Real-time Analytics
- Column-oriented
- Distributed Processing
- SQL Support
- Pluggable Indexing
- Star-tree Index
- Upsert Support
- Kafka
Only in MySQL
- ACID compliance
- SQL support
- Multi-version concurrency control
- Replication
- Partitioning
- Stored procedures
- Triggers
- Views
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Pinot
- Sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested datanot MySQL
- User-facing dashboards inside a productnot MySQL
- Real-time metrics at high ingest ratesnot MySQL
- Petabyte-scale analytics as run at LinkedIn and Ubernot MySQL
MySQL
- Web application backendnot Apache Pinot
- E-commerce platformsnot Apache Pinot
- Content management systemsnot Apache Pinot
- Data warehousingnot Apache Pinot
- Business applicationsnot Apache Pinot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Pinot
- Self-hosted and distributed, so running it means operating a cluster rather than consuming a service
- Managed hosting comes from third parties such as StarTree rather than from the project
- Built for user-facing real-time OLAP, so it is not a general purpose database
MySQL
- Hot online backup is not in the free Community Server; MySQL Enterprise Backup is a paid Enterprise Edition component
- Transparent Data Encryption, data masking and de-identification are Enterprise Edition only
- MySQL Enterprise Firewall, which guards against SQL injection, and MySQL Enterprise Audit are both paid components
- External authentication against PAM or Windows Active Directory requires MySQL Enterprise Authentication
- The thread pool ships as MySQL Enterprise Scalability rather than in the community build
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Pinot
Free- Open SourceFree
- Real-time analytics
- SQL queries
- Horizontal scaling
MySQL
Free- Community EditionFree
- Open source license
- Full SQL support
- InnoDB storage engine
- Standard Edition$2000/year
- Commercial license
- Oracle Premier Support
- MySQL Enterprise backup
- Enterprise Edition$5000/year
- Advanced security
- MySQL Enterprise Monitor
- High Availability
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Pinot if
- You need real-time analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want column-oriented.
Choose MySQL if
- You need acid compliance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux, Unix.
- You also want sql support.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Pinot or MySQL better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Pinot starts at Free and MySQL at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Pinot or MySQL?
- Apache Pinot starts at Free and MySQL at Free.
- Does Apache Pinot or MySQL run on more platforms?
- Apache Pinot runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. MySQL runs on Windows, Macos, Linux, Unix.
- Can I use Apache Pinot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache Pinot best used for?
- Apache Pinot is most often used for sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested data, user-facing dashboards inside a product, real-time metrics at high ingest rates, petabyte-scale analytics as run at linkedin and uber. Of those, sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested data and user-facing dashboards inside a product are not what MySQL is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Pinot do that MySQL cannot?
- Apache Pinot covers Real-time Analytics, Column-oriented, Distributed Processing, SQL Support. MySQL covers ACID compliance, SQL support, Multi-version concurrency control, Replication.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Pinot: How much does Apache Pinot cost?
Apache Pinot is free and open-source. It is provided under the Apache License, which allows free use, modification, and distribution.
SourceMySQL: Does MySQL cost money?
MySQL is primarily open-source and free to use. Commercial editions and support services are available but pricing is not published on the main website.
SourceApache Pinot: Is Apache Pinot free for commercial use?
Yes. Apache Pinot is licensed under the Apache License, which explicitly permits commercial use at no cost.
SourceMySQL: How do I get MySQL pricing information?
For MySQL commercial editions and support pricing, customers can contact MySQL sales directly at +1-866-221-0634 or navigate to individual product pages.
SourceApache Pinot: Can I run Apache Pinot locally or with Docker?
Yes. Apache Pinot offers a Docker quickstart and free downloads of the latest version (1.5.1 at the time of the page). You are responsible for hosting and infrastructure.
SourceApache Pinot: Are there restrictions on how I can use Apache Pinot?
The Apache License permits unrestricted use, but requires retention of license notices and statements. No usage limits or feature restrictions are enforced.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apache Pinot
Other head to heads
- Apache Pinot vs ClickHouse
- Apache Pinot vs Tinybird
- Apache Pinot vs Airtable
- Apache Pinot vs Cockroach Labs
- Apache Pinot vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Pinot vs Amazon Aurora
- Apache Pinot vs SingleStore
- Apache Pinot vs DuckDB
- Apache Pinot vs Firebolt
- Apache Pinot vs Estuary
- Apache Pinot vs TimescaleDB
- Apache Pinot vs Materialize
- Apache Pinot vs DataGrip
- Apache Pinot vs Google Cloud SQL
- Apache Pinot vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Apache Pinot vs QuestDB
- Apache Pinot vs Django
- Apache Pinot vs Laravel
- Apache Pinot vs Nginx
- Apache Pinot vs npm
- Apache Pinot vs Bolt.new
- Apache Pinot vs Ruby on Rails
- Apache Pinot vs Next.js
- Apache Pinot vs Flask
- Apache Pinot vs Nuxt
- Apache Pinot vs PHP
- Apache Pinot vs Spring Boot
- Apache Pinot vs Node.js
- Apache Pinot vs Wix
- Apache Pinot vs Apache HTTP Server
- Apache Pinot vs v0 by Vercel
- Apache Pinot vs Wix Studio
- MySQL vs ClickHouse
- MySQL vs Tinybird
- MySQL vs Airtable
- MySQL vs Cockroach Labs
- MySQL vs PostgreSQL
- MySQL vs Amazon Aurora
- MySQL vs SingleStore
- MySQL vs DuckDB
- MySQL vs Firebolt
- MySQL vs Estuary
- MySQL vs TimescaleDB
- MySQL vs Materialize
- MySQL vs DataGrip
- MySQL vs Google Cloud SQL
- MySQL vs Microsoft SQL Server
- MySQL vs QuestDB
- MySQL vs Django
- MySQL vs Laravel
- MySQL vs Nginx
- MySQL vs npm
- MySQL vs Bolt.new
- MySQL vs Ruby on Rails
- MySQL vs Next.js
- MySQL vs Flask
- MySQL vs Nuxt
- MySQL vs PHP
- MySQL vs Spring Boot
- MySQL vs Node.js
- MySQL vs Wix
- MySQL vs Apache HTTP Server
- MySQL vs v0 by Vercel
- MySQL vs Wix Studio

