Databases · head to head
Apache Pinot vs InfluxDB

Apache Pinot
Databases
Real-time distributed OLAP datastore for analytics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

InfluxDB
Logging
Purpose-built time series database for metrics and events
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache Pinot self-hosted and distributed, so running it means operating a cluster rather than consuming a service; InfluxDB high-cardinality data causes memory pressure and performance degradation
- They diverge on capability: Apache Pinot covers Real-time Analytics, InfluxDB covers Time-series Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Pinot and InfluxDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Pinot | InfluxDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Unknown |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes | Cloud, Docker, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud, Azure |
| Category | Databases | Logging |
| Founded | 1999 | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Pinot
- Real-time Analytics
- Column-oriented
- Distributed Processing
- SQL Support
- Pluggable Indexing
- Star-tree Index
- Upsert Support
- Kafka
Only in InfluxDB
- Time-series Storage
- Flux Query Language
- High Write Throughput
- Data Compression
- Retention Policies
- Continuous Queries
- Built-in Dashboards
- Telegraf
Both cover
- Linux support
- Docker support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Pinot
- Sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested datanot InfluxDB
- User-facing dashboards inside a productnot InfluxDB
- Real-time metrics at high ingest ratesnot InfluxDB
- Petabyte-scale analytics as run at LinkedIn and Ubernot InfluxDB
InfluxDB
- Monitoringnot Apache Pinot
- IoT datanot Apache Pinot
- Financial datanot Apache Pinot
- Log analyticsnot Apache Pinot
- Observabilitynot Apache Pinot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Pinot
- Self-hosted and distributed, so running it means operating a cluster rather than consuming a service
- Managed hosting comes from third parties such as StarTree rather than from the project
- Built for user-facing real-time OLAP, so it is not a general purpose database
InfluxDB
- High-cardinality data causes memory pressure and performance degradation
- No support for joins or transactions like relational databases
- Queries limited to 72-hour window in InfluxDB 3 OSS Core
- Clustering and authentication features absent from community version
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Pinot
Free- Open SourceFree
- Real-time analytics
- SQL queries
- Horizontal scaling
InfluxDB
Free- Cloud Serverless FreeFree
- 5 MB writes per 5 minutes
- 300 MB queries per 5 minutes
- 30 day retention
- Cloud Serverless Usage-Based$undefined/mo
- 0.0025 USD per MB ingested
- 0.012 USD per 100 queries
- 0.002 USD per GB-hour storage
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Pinot if
- You need real-time analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want column-oriented.
Choose InfluxDB if
- You need time-series storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Docker, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud, Azure.
- You also want flux query language.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Pinot or InfluxDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Pinot starts at Free and InfluxDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Pinot or InfluxDB?
- Apache Pinot starts at Free and InfluxDB at Free.
- Does Apache Pinot or InfluxDB run on more platforms?
- Apache Pinot runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. InfluxDB runs on Cloud, Docker, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud, Azure.
- Can I use Apache Pinot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache Pinot best used for?
- Apache Pinot is most often used for sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested data, user-facing dashboards inside a product, real-time metrics at high ingest rates, petabyte-scale analytics as run at linkedin and uber. Of those, sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested data and user-facing dashboards inside a product are not what InfluxDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Pinot do that InfluxDB cannot?
- Apache Pinot covers Real-time Analytics, Column-oriented, Distributed Processing, SQL Support. InfluxDB covers Time-series Storage, Flux Query Language, High Write Throughput, Data Compression. Both handle Linux support, Docker support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Pinot: How much does Apache Pinot cost?
Apache Pinot is free and open-source. It is provided under the Apache License, which allows free use, modification, and distribution.
SourceInfluxDB: Is there a free tier and what are the limits?
InfluxDB 3 Core OSS is free forever for local development and prototyping. Cloud Serverless free tier includes 5 MB writes per 5 minutes, 300 MB queries per 5 minutes, 30 day retention, and 2 databases.
SourceApache Pinot: Is Apache Pinot free for commercial use?
Yes. Apache Pinot is licensed under the Apache License, which explicitly permits commercial use at no cost.
SourceInfluxDB: Can I self-host InfluxDB?
Yes, InfluxDB 3 Core is fully open source and can be self-hosted with no license required. InfluxDB 3 Enterprise is self-managed and includes a 30-day free trial.
SourceApache Pinot: Can I run Apache Pinot locally or with Docker?
Yes. Apache Pinot offers a Docker quickstart and free downloads of the latest version (1.5.1 at the time of the page). You are responsible for hosting and infrastructure.
SourceInfluxDB: What are the series cardinality limitations?
InfluxDB is sensitive to high-cardinality data. High cardinality increases RAM usage and can trigger out-of-memory errors, making it unsuitable for some workloads with many unique tag combinations.
SourceApache Pinot: Are there restrictions on how I can use Apache Pinot?
The Apache License permits unrestricted use, but requires retention of license notices and statements. No usage limits or feature restrictions are enforced.
SourceInfluxDB: Does InfluxDB support SQL queries?
InfluxDB has limited SQL support. Full SQL is available in InfluxDB 3, but earlier versions support only specific SQL commands and use InfluxQL as the primary query language.
SourceInfluxDB: Can I export my data from InfluxDB?
Yes, data can be exported from InfluxDB using query results. However, the process and supported formats depend on the version and deployment type you are using.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apache Pinot
Other head to heads
- Apache Pinot vs ClickHouse
- Apache Pinot vs Tinybird
- Apache Pinot vs Airtable
- Apache Pinot vs Cockroach Labs
- Apache Pinot vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Pinot vs Amazon Aurora
- Apache Pinot vs SingleStore
- Apache Pinot vs DuckDB
- Apache Pinot vs Firebolt
- Apache Pinot vs Estuary
- Apache Pinot vs TimescaleDB
- Apache Pinot vs Materialize
- Apache Pinot vs DataGrip
- Apache Pinot vs Google Cloud SQL
- Apache Pinot vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Apache Pinot vs QuestDB
- Apache Pinot vs Traceloop
- Apache Pinot vs New Relic
- Apache Pinot vs Checkly
- Apache Pinot vs Cronitor
- Apache Pinot vs Healthchecks
- Apache Pinot vs Uptime.com
- Apache Pinot vs ELK Stack
- Apache Pinot vs Fluentd
- Apache Pinot vs Graylog
- Apache Pinot vs Logz.io
- Apache Pinot vs Honeybadger
- Apache Pinot vs Humio
- Apache Pinot vs Loggly
- Apache Pinot vs Kibana
- Apache Pinot vs Logstash
- InfluxDB vs ClickHouse
- InfluxDB vs Tinybird
- InfluxDB vs Airtable
- InfluxDB vs Cockroach Labs
- InfluxDB vs PostgreSQL
- InfluxDB vs Amazon Aurora
- InfluxDB vs SingleStore
- InfluxDB vs DuckDB
- InfluxDB vs Firebolt
- InfluxDB vs Estuary
- InfluxDB vs TimescaleDB
- InfluxDB vs Materialize
- InfluxDB vs DataGrip
- InfluxDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- InfluxDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- InfluxDB vs QuestDB
- InfluxDB vs Traceloop
- InfluxDB vs New Relic
- InfluxDB vs Checkly
- InfluxDB vs Cronitor
- InfluxDB vs Healthchecks
- InfluxDB vs Uptime.com
- InfluxDB vs ELK Stack
- InfluxDB vs Fluentd
- InfluxDB vs Graylog
- InfluxDB vs Logz.io
- InfluxDB vs Honeybadger
- InfluxDB vs Humio
- InfluxDB vs Loggly
- InfluxDB vs Kibana
- InfluxDB vs Logstash
