Database & Data Management · head to head
Amazon Aurora vs InfluxDB

Amazon Aurora
Database & Data Management
MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

InfluxDB
Log Management
Purpose-built time series database for metrics and events
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Aurora aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services; InfluxDB high-cardinality data causes memory pressure and performance degradation
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, InfluxDB covers Time-series Storage.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Aurora and InfluxDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Aurora | InfluxDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Unknown |
| Platforms | AWS Cloud | Cloud, Docker, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud, Azure |
| Category | Database & Data Management | Log Management |
| Founded | 2006 | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Aurora
- MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible
- 5x MySQL Performance
- Auto-scaling Storage
- Global Database
- Serverless v2
- Multi-master
- Fault Tolerant
- AWS Lambda
Only in InfluxDB
- Time-series Storage
- Flux Query Language
- High Write Throughput
- Data Compression
- Retention Policies
- Continuous Queries
- Built-in Dashboards
- Telegraf
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Aurora
- Transaction processingnot InfluxDB
- Data storagenot InfluxDB
- Application backendnot InfluxDB
- Reportingnot InfluxDB
- Data analyticsnot InfluxDB
InfluxDB
- Monitoringnot Amazon Aurora
- IoT datanot Amazon Aurora
- Financial datanot Amazon Aurora
- Log analyticsnot Amazon Aurora
- Observabilitynot Amazon Aurora
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Aurora
- Aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services
- Pricing can become expensive with high-traffic applications using many read replicas
- Limited support for non-relational data types compared to NoSQL alternatives
InfluxDB
- High-cardinality data causes memory pressure and performance degradation
- No support for joins or transactions like relational databases
- Queries limited to 72-hour window in InfluxDB 3 OSS Core
- Clustering and authentication features absent from community version
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Aurora
Free- Serverless v2$0.12/hour
- Auto-scaling
- Pay per ACU
- Instant scaling
- Provisioned$29/month
- Dedicated instances
- Predictable performance
- Reserved capacity
InfluxDB
Free- Cloud Serverless FreeFree
- 5 MB writes per 5 minutes
- 300 MB queries per 5 minutes
- 30 day retention
- Cloud Serverless Usage-Based$null/mo
- 0.0025 USD per MB ingested
- 0.012 USD per 100 queries
- 0.002 USD per GB-hour storage
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Aurora if
- You need mysql/postgresql compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS Cloud.
- You also want 5x mysql performance.
Choose InfluxDB if
- You need time-series storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Docker, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud, Azure.
- You also want flux query language.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Aurora or InfluxDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Aurora starts at Free and InfluxDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Aurora or InfluxDB?
- Amazon Aurora starts at Free and InfluxDB at Free.
- Does Amazon Aurora or InfluxDB run on more platforms?
- Amazon Aurora runs on AWS Cloud. InfluxDB runs on Cloud, Docker, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud, Azure.
- Can I use Amazon Aurora for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Aurora best used for?
- Amazon Aurora is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what InfluxDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Aurora do that InfluxDB cannot?
- Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, 5x MySQL Performance, Auto-scaling Storage, Global Database. InfluxDB covers Time-series Storage, Flux Query Language, High Write Throughput, Data Compression. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Aurora: Is Amazon Aurora compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL?
Yes, Amazon Aurora offers MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility with full compatibility to their open-source counterparts, allowing you to migrate existing databases with standard tools.
SourceInfluxDB: Is there a free tier and what are the limits?
InfluxDB 3 Core OSS is free forever for local development and prototyping. Cloud Serverless free tier includes 5 MB writes per 5 minutes, 300 MB queries per 5 minutes, 30 day retention, and 2 databases.
SourceAmazon Aurora: What uptime SLA does Amazon Aurora provide?
Aurora is designed for up to 99.99% single-region uptime and 99.999% multi-region uptime with automatic failover.
SourceInfluxDB: Can I self-host InfluxDB?
Yes, InfluxDB 3 Core is fully open source and can be self-hosted with no license required. InfluxDB 3 Enterprise is self-managed and includes a 30-day free trial.
SourceAmazon Aurora: How much does Amazon Aurora cost?
Aurora uses serverless, usage-based pricing where you pay only for consumed capacity. Typical pricing ranges from $50-70 per month for minimal setups to $400-600 per month for small production clusters.
SourceInfluxDB: What are the series cardinality limitations?
InfluxDB is sensitive to high-cardinality data. High cardinality increases RAM usage and can trigger out-of-memory errors, making it unsuitable for some workloads with many unique tag combinations.
SourceAmazon Aurora: Can Amazon Aurora scale automatically?
Yes, Aurora automatically scales to match workload demands without performance degradation, supporting both read and write scaling.
SourceInfluxDB: Does InfluxDB support SQL queries?
InfluxDB has limited SQL support. Full SQL is available in InfluxDB 3, but earlier versions support only specific SQL commands and use InfluxQL as the primary query language.
SourceAmazon Aurora: How many read replicas does Aurora support?
Aurora supports up to 15 low-latency read replicas for distributing read traffic across your application.
SourceInfluxDB: Can I export my data from InfluxDB?
Yes, data can be exported from InfluxDB using query results. However, the process and supported formats depend on the version and deployment type you are using.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Aurora
Other head to heads
- Amazon Aurora vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Aurora vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon Aurora vs Airtable
- Amazon Aurora vs Elasticsearch
- Amazon Aurora vs PlanetScale
- Amazon Aurora vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Aurora vs ClickHouse
- Amazon Aurora vs Couchbase
- Amazon Aurora vs DuckDB
- Amazon Aurora vs DynamoDB
- Amazon Aurora vs MariaDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Oracle Database
- Amazon Aurora vs Amazon RDS
- Amazon Aurora vs Amazon Redshift
- Amazon Aurora vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Aurora vs Cassandra
- Amazon Aurora vs CouchDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Firebolt
- Amazon Aurora vs Elastic Stack
- Amazon Aurora vs New Relic
- Amazon Aurora vs Datadog Logs
- Amazon Aurora vs Coralogix
- Amazon Aurora vs Grafana Loki
- Amazon Aurora vs CloudWatch
- Amazon Aurora vs Dynatrace
- Amazon Aurora vs Airbrake
- Amazon Aurora vs AppDynamics
- Amazon Aurora vs Axiom
- Amazon Aurora vs Azure Monitor
- Amazon Aurora vs Better Stack
- Amazon Aurora vs Bugsnag
- Amazon Aurora vs Dynatrace Logs
- Amazon Aurora vs Elastic
- Amazon Aurora vs Elastic APM
- Amazon Aurora vs Elasticsearch Service
- Amazon Aurora vs ELK Stack
- InfluxDB vs Cockroach Labs
- InfluxDB vs PostgreSQL
- InfluxDB vs Airtable
- InfluxDB vs Elasticsearch
- InfluxDB vs PlanetScale
- InfluxDB vs Azure SQL
- InfluxDB vs ClickHouse
- InfluxDB vs Couchbase
- InfluxDB vs DuckDB
- InfluxDB vs DynamoDB
- InfluxDB vs MariaDB
- InfluxDB vs Oracle Database
- InfluxDB vs Amazon RDS
- InfluxDB vs Amazon Redshift
- InfluxDB vs Apache Druid
- InfluxDB vs Cassandra
- InfluxDB vs CouchDB
- InfluxDB vs Firebolt
- InfluxDB vs Elastic Stack
- InfluxDB vs New Relic
- InfluxDB vs Datadog Logs
- InfluxDB vs Coralogix
- InfluxDB vs Grafana Loki
- InfluxDB vs CloudWatch
- InfluxDB vs Dynatrace
- InfluxDB vs Airbrake
- InfluxDB vs AppDynamics
- InfluxDB vs Axiom
- InfluxDB vs Azure Monitor
- InfluxDB vs Better Stack
- InfluxDB vs Bugsnag
- InfluxDB vs Dynatrace Logs
- InfluxDB vs Elastic
- InfluxDB vs Elastic APM
- InfluxDB vs Elasticsearch Service
- InfluxDB vs ELK Stack
