Software · head to head
ClickHouse vs InfluxDB

ClickHouse
Software
Fast open-source column-oriented database for real-time analytics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

InfluxDB
Software
Purpose-built time series database for metrics and events
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ClickHouse limited multi-row atomic transactions and expensive UPDATE/DELETE operations unsuitable for transactional systems; InfluxDB high-cardinality data causes memory pressure and performance degradation
- They diverge on capability: ClickHouse covers Column-oriented Storage, InfluxDB covers Time-series Storage.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ClickHouse and InfluxDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | ClickHouse | InfluxDB |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows (via Docker) | Cloud, Docker, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud, Azure |
| Founded | 2021 | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Unknown), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ClickHouse
- Column-oriented Storage
- Real-time Analytics
- SQL Support
- Linear Scalability
- Vectorized Query Execution
- Approximate Calculations
- Kafka
- S3
Only in InfluxDB
- Time-series Storage
- Flux Query Language
- High Write Throughput
- Retention Policies
- Continuous Queries
- Built-in Dashboards
- Telegraf
- Kapacitor
Both cover
- Data Compression
- Grafana
- Linux support
- Mac support
- Docker support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ClickHouse
- Business intelligencenot InfluxDB
- Data warehousingnot InfluxDB
- Real-time analyticsnot InfluxDB
- Reportingnot InfluxDB
- Machine learningnot InfluxDB
InfluxDB
- Monitoringnot ClickHouse
- IoT datanot ClickHouse
- Financial datanot ClickHouse
- Log analyticsnot ClickHouse
- Observabilitynot ClickHouse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ClickHouse
- Limited multi-row atomic transactions and expensive UPDATE/DELETE operations unsuitable for transactional systems
- Requires upfront schema design discipline with MergeTree engine choices and sort/partition keys
- Experimental vector search support, not production-ready for vector operations
- Different query syntax from standard SQL requiring migration planning
- Limited JOIN capabilities compared to traditional relational databases
- Migration complexity with 2-4 weeks estimated for data type mapping and query translation
InfluxDB
- High-cardinality data causes memory pressure and performance degradation
- No support for joins or transactions like relational databases
- Queries limited to 72-hour window in InfluxDB 3 OSS Core
- Clustering and authentication features absent from community version
Pricing, plan by plan
ClickHouse
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the ClickHouse review.
InfluxDB
Free- Cloud Serverless FreeFree
- 5 MB writes per 5 minutes
- 300 MB queries per 5 minutes
- 30 day retention
- Cloud Serverless Usage-Based$null/mo
- 0.0025 USD per MB ingested
- 0.012 USD per 100 queries
- 0.002 USD per GB-hour storage
Which should you pick?
Choose ClickHouse if
- You need column-oriented storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows (via Docker).
- You also want real-time analytics.
Choose InfluxDB if
- You need time-series storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Docker, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud, Azure.
- You also want flux query language.
Questions people ask
- Is ClickHouse or InfluxDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. ClickHouse starts at Free and InfluxDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ClickHouse or InfluxDB?
- ClickHouse starts at Free and InfluxDB at Free.
- Does ClickHouse or InfluxDB run on more platforms?
- ClickHouse runs on Linux, macOS, Windows (via Docker). InfluxDB runs on Cloud, Docker, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud, Azure.
- Can I use ClickHouse for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ClickHouse best used for?
- ClickHouse is most often used for business intelligence, data warehousing, real-time analytics, reporting. Of those, business intelligence and data warehousing are not what InfluxDB is typically brought in for.
- What can ClickHouse do that InfluxDB cannot?
- ClickHouse covers Column-oriented Storage, Real-time Analytics, SQL Support, Linear Scalability. InfluxDB covers Time-series Storage, Flux Query Language, High Write Throughput, Retention Policies. Both handle Data Compression, Grafana, Linux support, Mac support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ClickHouse: What is ClickHouse best used for?
ClickHouse is optimized for analytical workloads on large datasets. It excels at fast aggregations and queries, being 10-100x faster than PostgreSQL on large aggregations.
SourceInfluxDB: Is there a free tier and what are the limits?
InfluxDB 3 Core OSS is free forever for local development and prototyping. Cloud Serverless free tier includes 5 MB writes per 5 minutes, 300 MB queries per 5 minutes, 30 day retention, and 2 databases.
SourceClickHouse: Does ClickHouse support transactions?
ClickHouse has limited transaction support and expensive UPDATE/DELETE operations. It is not suitable for transactional workloads requiring strict ACID guarantees.
SourceInfluxDB: Can I self-host InfluxDB?
Yes, InfluxDB 3 Core is fully open source and can be self-hosted with no license required. InfluxDB 3 Enterprise is self-managed and includes a 30-day free trial.
SourceClickHouse: How does ClickHouse compare to PostgreSQL?
ClickHouse is 10-100x faster for analytics but PostgreSQL is better for transactional workloads. Many teams use both: PostgreSQL for writes via MaterializedPostgreSQL replication to ClickHouse for analytics.
SourceInfluxDB: What are the series cardinality limitations?
InfluxDB is sensitive to high-cardinality data. High cardinality increases RAM usage and can trigger out-of-memory errors, making it unsuitable for some workloads with many unique tag combinations.
SourceInfluxDB: Does InfluxDB support SQL queries?
InfluxDB has limited SQL support. Full SQL is available in InfluxDB 3, but earlier versions support only specific SQL commands and use InfluxQL as the primary query language.
SourceInfluxDB: Can I export my data from InfluxDB?
Yes, data can be exported from InfluxDB using query results. However, the process and supported formats depend on the version and deployment type you are using.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- ClickHouse vs Cockroach Labs
- ClickHouse vs PostgreSQL
- ClickHouse vs Airtable
- ClickHouse vs Amazon Aurora
- ClickHouse vs Elasticsearch
- ClickHouse vs PlanetScale
- ClickHouse vs Azure SQL
- ClickHouse vs Couchbase
- ClickHouse vs DuckDB
- ClickHouse vs DynamoDB
- ClickHouse vs MariaDB
- ClickHouse vs Oracle Database
- ClickHouse vs Amazon RDS
- ClickHouse vs Amazon Redshift
- ClickHouse vs Apache Druid
- ClickHouse vs Cassandra
- ClickHouse vs CouchDB
- ClickHouse vs Firebolt
- ClickHouse vs Elastic Stack
- ClickHouse vs New Relic
- ClickHouse vs Datadog Logs
- ClickHouse vs Coralogix
- ClickHouse vs Grafana Loki
- ClickHouse vs CloudWatch
- ClickHouse vs Dynatrace
- ClickHouse vs Airbrake
- ClickHouse vs AppDynamics
- ClickHouse vs Axiom
- ClickHouse vs Azure Monitor
- ClickHouse vs Better Stack
- ClickHouse vs Bugsnag
- ClickHouse vs Dynatrace Logs
- ClickHouse vs Elastic
- ClickHouse vs Elastic APM
- ClickHouse vs Elasticsearch Service
- ClickHouse vs ELK Stack
- InfluxDB vs Cockroach Labs
- InfluxDB vs PostgreSQL
- InfluxDB vs Airtable
- InfluxDB vs Amazon Aurora
- InfluxDB vs Elasticsearch
- InfluxDB vs PlanetScale
- InfluxDB vs Azure SQL
- InfluxDB vs Couchbase
- InfluxDB vs DuckDB
- InfluxDB vs DynamoDB
- InfluxDB vs MariaDB
- InfluxDB vs Oracle Database
- InfluxDB vs Amazon RDS
- InfluxDB vs Amazon Redshift
- InfluxDB vs Apache Druid
- InfluxDB vs Cassandra
- InfluxDB vs CouchDB
- InfluxDB vs Firebolt
- InfluxDB vs Elastic Stack
- InfluxDB vs New Relic
- InfluxDB vs Datadog Logs
- InfluxDB vs Coralogix
- InfluxDB vs Grafana Loki
- InfluxDB vs CloudWatch
- InfluxDB vs Dynatrace
- InfluxDB vs Airbrake
- InfluxDB vs AppDynamics
- InfluxDB vs Axiom
- InfluxDB vs Azure Monitor
- InfluxDB vs Better Stack
- InfluxDB vs Bugsnag
- InfluxDB vs Dynatrace Logs
- InfluxDB vs Elastic
- InfluxDB vs Elastic APM
- InfluxDB vs Elasticsearch Service
- InfluxDB vs ELK Stack
