Databases · head to head
Apache Doris vs Apache Hadoop

Apache Doris
Databases
MPP analytical database with a MySQL wire protocol and sub-second aggregation on wide tables
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Apache Hadoop
Databases
The original open source framework for distributed storage and batch processing on commodity servers, now largely a legacy platform.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Both are free.
- Only Apache Doris lists MySQL wire protocol; only Apache Hadoop lists kerberos security.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Doris and Apache Hadoop actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Doris | Apache Hadoop |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Open-source |
| Platforms | Linux, Self-hosted | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Doris
- MySQL wire protocol
- Aggregate and unique key models
- Materialised views
- Multi-catalogue federation
- Routine load from Kafka
- Compute storage separation
- Inverted indexes
- Workload groups
Only in Apache Hadoop
- HDFS
- YARN
- MapReduce
- HDFS federation and high availability
- Kerberos security
- Rack awareness
- S3A and object store connectors
- Ecosystem compatibility
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Doris
- A team whose MySQL read replica can no longer serve reporting queries and wants an OLAP engine its existing drivers already speaknot Apache Hadoop
- A real-time dashboard backend needing sub-second aggregation over billions of rows with hundreds of concurrent usersnot Apache Hadoop
- An ad or ecommerce platform that needs updates and deletes on analytical tables, which append-only OLAP engines handle badlynot Apache Hadoop
- A data team that wants one SQL endpoint over both internal tables and existing Hive or Iceberg tables in the lakenot Apache Hadoop
Apache Hadoop
- Operating an existing multi-petabyte on-premises estate where data residency or egress costs rule out moving to cloud object storagenot Apache Doris
- Running Spark or Flink under YARN on hardware you already own, using HDFS as the storage layernot Apache Doris
- Keeping long-lived regulated archives on infrastructure entirely within your own data centres and legal jurisdictionnot Apache Doris
- Maintaining legacy Hive and MapReduce workloads during a staged migration to a lakehouse or cloud platformnot Apache Doris
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Doris
- Two competing commercial vendors, VeloDB and SelectDB, were founded by overlapping core contributors, which makes the long-term governance and roadmap of the project harder to predict than a single-sponsor project
- A large share of design discussion, issue reports and documentation detail originates in Chinese, so teams that do not read it get a thinner picture of known problems and workarounds
- Operating a cluster means managing frontend and backend node roles, tablet balancing and compaction tuning, and compaction backlogs under heavy upsert load are a recurring production complaint
- The MySQL protocol compatibility is at the wire level, not full MySQL semantics, so queries and functions still need porting and the familiarity can mislead
- Managed cloud availability outside China and major clouds is limited compared with ClickHouse or Snowflake, so many Western adopters end up self-hosting whether they wanted to or not
Apache Hadoop
- The free vendor distributions no longer exist: Cloudera's CDH and Hortonworks' HDP have reached end of support and the successor CDP is subscription-only, so running Hadoop without paying now means assembling, testing and security-patching Apache releases yourself
- HDFS couples storage to compute, so adding capacity means buying whole nodes with CPU and memory you may not need, and the entire industry moved to object storage precisely because it lets the two be bought separately
- The NameNode holds all filesystem metadata in memory, so a cluster with tens of millions of small files exhausts heap long before it exhausts disk, and the remedy is a file compaction job that somebody has to write, schedule and own indefinitely
- Operating it is a distinct specialism covering Kerberos, YARN queue tuning, JVM garbage collection and the compatibility matrix between Hive, HBase, Ranger, Oozie and the core, and an upgrade touches all of them at once rather than one at a time
- MapReduce is maintained for compatibility rather than actively developed, and new work goes to Spark or Flink, so a job written against MapReduce today is written against an API that will not gain anything further
- Hiring is against you: the talent pool has moved to cloud data platforms over the past decade, so a Hadoop estate increasingly depends on a small number of individuals, which makes it a succession risk before it is a technical one
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Doris
Free- Apache DorisFree
- Apache 2.0 licence with no usage restrictions
- All engine features included
- Community support via mailing list and Slack
Apache Hadoop
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Apache Hadoop review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Doris if
- You need mysql wire protocol.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want aggregate and unique key models.
Choose Apache Hadoop if
- You need hdfs.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want yarn.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Doris or Apache Hadoop better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Doris starts at Free and Apache Hadoop at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Doris or Apache Hadoop?
- Apache Doris starts at Free and Apache Hadoop at Free.
- Does Apache Doris or Apache Hadoop run on more platforms?
- Apache Doris runs on Linux, Self-hosted. Apache Hadoop runs on Web.
- Can I use Apache Doris for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache Doris best used for?
- Apache Doris is most often used for a team whose mysql read replica can no longer serve reporting queries and wants an olap engine its existing drivers already speak, a real-time dashboard backend needing sub-second aggregation over billions of rows with hundreds of concurrent users, an ad or ecommerce platform that needs updates and deletes on analytical tables, which append-only olap engines handle badly, a data team that wants one sql endpoint over both internal tables and existing hive or iceberg tables in the lake. Of those, a team whose mysql read replica can no longer serve reporting queries and wants an olap engine its existing drivers already speak and a real-time dashboard backend needing sub-second aggregation over billions of rows with hundreds of concurrent users are not what Apache Hadoop is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Doris do that Apache Hadoop cannot?
- Apache Doris covers MySQL wire protocol, Aggregate and unique key models, Materialised views, Multi-catalogue federation. Apache Hadoop covers HDFS, YARN, MapReduce, HDFS federation and high availability.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Doris: Is Apache Doris really free?
Yes, it is Apache 2.0 with no usage restrictions. The commercial products are managed services from VeloDB and SelectDB.
Apache Hadoop: Is Hadoop dead?
No, but it is legacy. Large on-premises HDFS estates still run and are still supported, and Spark and Flink still run on YARN. What has ended is Hadoop as a default choice for new platforms, which now start on object storage.
Apache Doris: Can I use my MySQL tools with it?
Yes, it implements the MySQL wire protocol, so clients and BI connectors attach without a new driver, though SQL semantics differ.
Apache Hadoop: Can I still get a free packaged distribution?
Not a maintained one. CDH and HDP reached end of support and Cloudera's CDP is a paid subscription. The remaining free route is building and patching Apache releases yourself, which is a real engineering commitment.
Apache Doris: How does it compare with ClickHouse?
Doris handles updates and high concurrency more comfortably; ClickHouse is generally faster on raw single-query scan throughput and has far wider Western support.
Apache Hadoop: Do I need Hadoop to run Spark?
No. Spark runs standalone, on Kubernetes and on managed cloud services, and reads object storage directly. Many Spark deployments include Hadoop client libraries for the filesystem connectors without running a Hadoop cluster at all.
Apache Doris: Who maintains it?
The Apache Software Foundation project, with most committers employed by VeloDB or SelectDB.
Apache Hadoop: What replaced HDFS?
Object storage, typically S3 or a compatible system, combined with an open table format such as Apache Iceberg or Delta Lake. Apache Ozone exists as an object store within the Hadoop ecosystem for organisations staying on-premises.
Apache Hadoop: Is it cheaper than the cloud?
It can be at multi-petabyte scale with steady, predictable utilisation, particularly where egress charges would be large. Include the staffing cost honestly, because the specialist operators a Hadoop cluster requires are scarce and therefore expensive.
Related pages
More on Apache Doris
More on Apache Hadoop
Other head to heads
- Apache Doris vs ClickHouse
- Apache Doris vs StarRocks
- Apache Doris vs Tinybird
- Apache Doris vs DuckDB
- Apache Doris vs Firebolt
- Apache Doris vs Amazon Redshift
- Apache Doris vs TiDB
- Apache Doris vs Trino
- Apache Doris vs BigQuery
- Apache Doris vs Canary Labs
- Apache Doris vs Dragonfly
- Apache Doris vs Dremio
- Apache Doris vs Vitess
- Apache Doris vs Aiven
- Apache Doris vs CosmosDB
- Apache Doris vs DataStax
- Apache Doris vs dbt
- Apache Doris vs EMQX
- Apache Doris vs Apache Spark
- Apache Doris vs Teradata
- Apache Doris vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Apache Doris vs Timeplus
- Apache Doris vs Estuary
- Apache Doris vs FaunaDB
- Apache Doris vs Privacera
- Apache Doris vs Xata
- Apache Doris vs VerneMQ
- Apache Doris vs Vespa
- Apache Doris vs YugabyteDB
- Apache Doris vs Zilliz
- Apache Doris vs Airtable
- Apache Doris vs Cockroach Labs
- Apache Hadoop vs ClickHouse
- Apache Hadoop vs StarRocks
- Apache Hadoop vs Tinybird
- Apache Hadoop vs DuckDB
- Apache Hadoop vs Firebolt
- Apache Hadoop vs Amazon Redshift
- Apache Hadoop vs TiDB
- Apache Hadoop vs Trino
- Apache Hadoop vs BigQuery
- Apache Hadoop vs Canary Labs
- Apache Hadoop vs Dragonfly
- Apache Hadoop vs Dremio
- Apache Hadoop vs Vitess
- Apache Hadoop vs Aiven
- Apache Hadoop vs CosmosDB
- Apache Hadoop vs DataStax
- Apache Hadoop vs dbt
- Apache Hadoop vs EMQX
- Apache Hadoop vs Apache Spark
- Apache Hadoop vs Teradata
- Apache Hadoop vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Apache Hadoop vs Timeplus
- Apache Hadoop vs Estuary
- Apache Hadoop vs FaunaDB
- Apache Hadoop vs Privacera
- Apache Hadoop vs Xata
- Apache Hadoop vs VerneMQ
- Apache Hadoop vs Vespa
- Apache Hadoop vs YugabyteDB
- Apache Hadoop vs Zilliz
- Apache Hadoop vs Airtable
- Apache Hadoop vs Cockroach Labs
