Databases · head to head
Apache Airflow vs Windmill

Apache Airflow
Databases
Programmatically author, schedule and monitor data workflows in Python
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Windmill
Automation Integration
Open-source developer platform for building scripts, workflows, and internal apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache Airflow self-hosting is genuinely heavy: scheduler, metadata database, workers and executor choice are a standing operational job; Windmill free self-hosted tier caps SSO users at 10 and workspaces at 3, requiring Enterprise for larger teams.
- They diverge on capability: Apache Airflow covers Pipelines as Python, Windmill covers Script-to-workflow engine.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Airflow and Windmill actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Airflow | Windmill |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee; managed services billed separately | open-source |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted | web, api, linux, windows, mac |
| Category | Databases | Automation Integration |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Airflow
- Pipelines as Python
- Web UI
- Cloud provider packages
- Jinja templating
- Retries and dependencies
- Extensible operators
Only in Windmill
- Script-to-workflow engine
- Auto-generated UIs
- Self-hosted deployment
- Git sync
- SSO support
- Audit logs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Airflow
- Scheduling nightly ETL where step order and retries matternot Windmill
- Coordinating machine learning training and evaluation runsnot Windmill
- Orchestrating dbt runs alongside extraction and loadingnot Windmill
- Replacing a sprawl of cron jobs with dependencies and visible run historynot Windmill
Windmill
- Turning ad-hoc scripts into scheduled jobs and APIsnot Apache Airflow
- Building internal tools from existing Python/TypeScript codenot Apache Airflow
- Self-hosted automation for engineering teamsnot Apache Airflow
- Orchestrating multi-language workflowsnot Apache Airflow
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Airflow
- Self-hosting is genuinely heavy: scheduler, metadata database, workers and executor choice are a standing operational job
- Built for scheduled batch work, and a poor fit for event-driven or sub-minute latency pipelines
- Because DAGs are Python that the scheduler parses continuously, expensive top-level code in a DAG file slows the whole scheduler
- Local development and testing of DAGs is awkward compared with newer orchestrators designed with it in mind
Windmill
- Free self-hosted tier caps SSO users at 10 and workspaces at 3, requiring Enterprise for larger teams.
- Compute unit and seat-based pricing (developer vs. operator seats, worker compute units) adds pricing complexity beyond a flat monthly fee.
- Email triggers are capped at 100/day on the free tier, limiting event-driven use cases without upgrading.
- Smaller ecosystem of pre-built integrations compared to more established automation tools like n8n.
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Airflow
Free- Apache AirflowFree
- Full scheduler and web UI
- All provider packages
- No task or DAG limits
Windmill
Free- Free / Open-sourceFree
- Unlimited executions
- Self-hosted deployment
- Max 10 users with SSO
- Enterprise$120/month
- Unlimited executions and workspaces
- Uncapped SSO seats
- 24/7 priority support (3-hour response)
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Airflow if
- You need pipelines as python.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want web ui.
Choose Windmill if
- You need script-to-workflow engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- You also want auto-generated uis.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Airflow or Windmill better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Airflow starts at Free and Windmill at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Airflow or Windmill?
- Apache Airflow starts at Free and Windmill at Free.
- Does Apache Airflow or Windmill run on more platforms?
- Apache Airflow runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. Windmill runs on web, api, linux, windows, mac.
- Can I use Apache Airflow for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache Airflow best used for?
- Apache Airflow is most often used for scheduling nightly etl where step order and retries matter, coordinating machine learning training and evaluation runs, orchestrating dbt runs alongside extraction and loading, replacing a sprawl of cron jobs with dependencies and visible run history. Of those, scheduling nightly etl where step order and retries matter and coordinating machine learning training and evaluation runs are not what Windmill is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Airflow do that Windmill cannot?
- Apache Airflow covers Pipelines as Python, Web UI, Cloud provider packages, Jinja templating. Windmill covers Script-to-workflow engine, Auto-generated UIs, Self-hosted deployment, Git sync.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Airflow: Is Apache Airflow free?
Yes. Airflow is open source under the Apache Software Foundation with no licence fee. Costs are the infrastructure to run it, or a managed service such as Google Cloud Composer or Amazon MWAA.
Windmill: What does Windmill cost?
Windmill's Free and Open-source edition is $0/month for self-hosted use with unlimited executions, while Enterprise starts at $120/month with unlimited workspaces and uncapped SSO seats, priced further by developer/operator seats and compute units.
SourceApache Airflow: What language are Airflow workflows written in?
Python. A workflow is a Python file, so standard language features including loops and datetime handling can generate tasks dynamically, with no XML or command-line configuration.
Windmill: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
The free self-hosted plan supports unlimited executions but caps SSO at 10 users, workspaces at 3, groups/permissions at 4, and email triggers at 100 per day.
SourceApache Airflow: Is Airflow suitable for real-time pipelines?
Not really. Airflow is designed for scheduled batch orchestration. Event-driven or sub-minute work is better served by a streaming platform such as Kafka or a purpose-built streaming engine.
Windmill: How is usage metered on Windmill Enterprise?
Enterprise usage is metered through seats (developer seats at $20/month, operator seats at $10/month) and compute units, e.g. $100/month for 2 standard-worker compute units.
SourceApache Airflow: What are the main alternatives to Airflow?
Dagster and Prefect are the two most commonly weighed against it, both newer and both designed around the local development and testing experience Airflow is criticised for.
Windmill: What happens to a self-hosted Windmill deployment if the company shuts down?
The pricing page addresses this directly as an FAQ topic, noting that self-hosted applications built on the open-source edition can continue running independently of Windmill the company.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apache Airflow
Other head to heads
- Apache Airflow vs dbt
- Apache Airflow vs Redpanda
- Apache Airflow vs Meilisearch
- Apache Airflow vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Airflow vs RabbitMQ
- Apache Airflow vs NATS
- Apache Airflow vs DuckDB
- Apache Airflow vs MariaDB
- Apache Airflow vs QuestDB
- Apache Airflow vs Aiven
- Apache Airflow vs Memcached
- Apache Airflow vs OpenSearch
- Apache Airflow vs Knack
- Apache Airflow vs LanceDB
- Apache Airflow vs Marqo
- Apache Airflow vs Nile
- Apache Airflow vs Ninox
- Apache Airflow vs Presto
- Apache Airflow vs n8n
- Apache Airflow vs Nango
- Apache Airflow vs Airbyte
- Apache Airflow vs Flowable
- Apache Airflow vs Meltano
- Apache Airflow vs RudderStack
- Apache Airflow vs Grouparoo
- Apache Airflow vs Activiti
- Apache Airflow vs jBPM
- Apache Airflow vs Merge
- Apache Airflow vs Camunda
- Apache Airflow vs Flowise
- Apache Airflow vs Automate.io
- Apache Airflow vs Autonoly
- Apache Airflow vs Boomi
- Apache Airflow vs Browser Use
- Apache Airflow vs Browserbase
- Windmill vs dbt
- Windmill vs Redpanda
- Windmill vs Meilisearch
- Windmill vs PostgreSQL
- Windmill vs RabbitMQ
- Windmill vs NATS
- Windmill vs DuckDB
- Windmill vs MariaDB
- Windmill vs QuestDB
- Windmill vs Aiven
- Windmill vs Memcached
- Windmill vs OpenSearch
- Windmill vs Knack
- Windmill vs LanceDB
- Windmill vs Marqo
- Windmill vs Nile
- Windmill vs Ninox
- Windmill vs Presto
- Windmill vs n8n
- Windmill vs Nango
- Windmill vs Airbyte
- Windmill vs Flowable
- Windmill vs Meltano
- Windmill vs RudderStack
- Windmill vs Grouparoo
- Windmill vs Activiti
- Windmill vs jBPM
- Windmill vs Merge
- Windmill vs Camunda
- Windmill vs Flowise
- Windmill vs Automate.io
- Windmill vs Autonoly
- Windmill vs Boomi
- Windmill vs Browser Use
- Windmill vs Browserbase
