APIs · head to head
Akoya vs Ory Kratos

Akoya
APIs
Bank-owned, token-based open finance network that replaces screen scraping for US financial data
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Ory Kratos has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Akoya coverage reaches several thousand institutions but does not match aggregators that can still scrape, so applications needing the long tail of small credit unions will run a second data provider alongside it.; Ory Kratos headless means you build every screen, which is significant work compared with a hosted login page
- They diverge on capability: Akoya covers FDX standard APIs, Ory Kratos covers Headless API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Akoya and Ory Kratos actually diverge.
| Attribute | Akoya | Ory Kratos |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Open-source self-hosted, with a paid managed network |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted |
| Category | APIs | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Akoya
- FDX standard APIs
- Token-based access
- Investment data
- Accounts, balances and transactions
- Statements and tax forms
- Customer identity
- Consumer permission management
- Single integration
Only in Ory Kratos
- Headless API
- Self-service flows
- Multi-factor authentication
- Pluggable identity schemas
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Akoya
- A wealth management platform that needs Fidelity brokerage holdings and tax lots, which cannot be scraped since Fidelity closed that route in October 2023not Ory Kratos
- A tax preparation product retrieving tax forms and cost basis directly from the institution rather than asking users to upload PDFsnot Ory Kratos
- A lender that needs a permissioning trail defensible under CFPB section 1033 rather than a credential-sharing arrangementnot Ory Kratos
- A bank that wants to meet data sharing obligations through one network connection instead of building and policing its own developer interfacenot Ory Kratos
Ory Kratos
- Products needing complete control over the look and flow of authenticationnot Akoya
- Applications that must not hand user identity data to a third partynot Akoya
- Teams building identity as infrastructure across several servicesnot Akoya
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Akoya
- Coverage reaches several thousand institutions but does not match aggregators that can still scrape, so applications needing the long tail of small credit unions will run a second data provider alongside it.
- The network is owned by large banks, so roadmap and coverage priorities reflect owner interests rather than those of the fintechs consuming the data, and a recipient has no leverage over which institutions are added next.
- Data availability is decided institution by institution, meaning a bank may expose balances but not transactions or investments, and recipients must verify field-level coverage per institution rather than assume the FDX model is fully populated.
- Pricing is unpublished and usage based, which makes it difficult to compare against aggregator pricing during a build-versus-buy decision and forces a sales cycle before you can model cost.
- The token model requires the institution to have implemented its side, so newly onboarded institutions arrive on the institution timetable, not yours, and a launch dependent on a specific bank can slip badly.
Ory Kratos
- Headless means you build every screen, which is significant work compared with a hosted login page
- More moving parts than a monolithic IAM: Kratos handles identity, and OAuth2 needs Ory Hydra alongside
- Documentation assumes real familiarity with identity concepts and is not a gentle introduction
- Self-hosting identity carries the security and availability burden that hosted providers absorb
Pricing, plan by plan
Akoya
On request- Akoya Data Access$undefined/year
- Usage-based pricing quoted by data product and call volume
- Separate commercial terms for data recipients and for financial institutions joining the network
- No published rate card
Ory Kratos
Free- Self-hostedFree
- Full identity server
- All flows
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Ory Kratos if
- You need headless api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want self-service flows.
Questions people ask
- Is Akoya or Ory Kratos better?
- Neither clearly leads. Akoya starts at On request and Ory Kratos at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Akoya or Ory Kratos?
- Ory Kratos has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Akoya and Free for Ory Kratos.
- Does Akoya or Ory Kratos run on more platforms?
- Akoya runs on Web. Ory Kratos runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Ory Kratos for free?
- Yes. Ory Kratos has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Akoya starts at On request.
- What is Akoya best used for?
- Akoya is most often used for a wealth management platform that needs fidelity brokerage holdings and tax lots, which cannot be scraped since fidelity closed that route in october 2023, a tax preparation product retrieving tax forms and cost basis directly from the institution rather than asking users to upload pdfs, a lender that needs a permissioning trail defensible under cfpb section 1033 rather than a credential-sharing arrangement, a bank that wants to meet data sharing obligations through one network connection instead of building and policing its own developer interface. Of those, a wealth management platform that needs fidelity brokerage holdings and tax lots, which cannot be scraped since fidelity closed that route in october 2023 and a tax preparation product retrieving tax forms and cost basis directly from the institution rather than asking users to upload pdfs are not what Ory Kratos is typically brought in for.
- What can Akoya do that Ory Kratos cannot?
- Akoya covers FDX standard APIs, Token-based access, Investment data, Accounts, balances and transactions. Ory Kratos covers Headless API, Self-service flows, Multi-factor authentication, Pluggable identity schemas.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Akoya: Who owns Akoya?
A group of large US banks. It was spun out of Fidelity, which is why Fidelity data access runs through it.
Ory Kratos: Is Ory Kratos free?
Yes, open source and free to self-host. Ory Network is a paid managed service.
Akoya: Is Akoya screen scraping?
No. It uses FDX standard APIs with OpenID Connect tokens, so credentials are never shared with or stored by the data recipient.
Ory Kratos: What does headless mean here?
Kratos provides identity flows as APIs and no user interface. You build the login, registration and recovery screens yourself.
Akoya: Can we use Akoya alone instead of an aggregator?
Usually not. Its investment and large-institution coverage is excellent, but the long tail of smaller institutions is thinner, so most teams run both.
Ory Kratos: Does Kratos do OAuth2?
No. Kratos handles user identity; OAuth2 and OpenID Connect provider functionality is Ory Hydra, a separate component.
Akoya: Does it help with CFPB section 1033?
It is designed around it, providing tokenised permissioned access and consumer revocation rather than credential sharing.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Akoya vs Yodlee
- Akoya vs MX Technologies
- Akoya vs Ozone API
- Akoya vs Aiia
- Akoya vs Tink
- Akoya vs Salt Edge
- Akoya vs Trustly
- Akoya vs Lithic
- Akoya vs Token.io
- Akoya vs Bud Financial
- Akoya vs Tribe Payments
- Akoya vs Method Financial
- Akoya vs Asyncapi
- Akoya vs AWS API Gateway
- Akoya vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Akoya vs Basis Theory
- Akoya vs Boomi API Management
- Akoya vs Codat
- Akoya vs Logto
- Akoya vs Authelia
- Akoya vs 1Password
- Akoya vs authentik
- Akoya vs Clerk
- Akoya vs Trivy
- Akoya vs LastPass
- Akoya vs HashiCorp Vault
- Akoya vs Bitwarden
- Akoya vs Frontegg
- Akoya vs Infisical
- Akoya vs Semgrep
- Akoya vs Envysion
- Akoya vs Feedzai
- Akoya vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Akoya vs JumpCloud
- Ory Kratos vs Yodlee
- Ory Kratos vs MX Technologies
- Ory Kratos vs Ozone API
- Ory Kratos vs Aiia
- Ory Kratos vs Tink
- Ory Kratos vs Salt Edge
- Ory Kratos vs Trustly
- Ory Kratos vs Lithic
- Ory Kratos vs Token.io
- Ory Kratos vs Bud Financial
- Ory Kratos vs Tribe Payments
- Ory Kratos vs Method Financial
- Ory Kratos vs Asyncapi
- Ory Kratos vs AWS API Gateway
- Ory Kratos vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Ory Kratos vs Basis Theory
- Ory Kratos vs Boomi API Management
- Ory Kratos vs Codat
- Ory Kratos vs Logto
- Ory Kratos vs Authelia
- Ory Kratos vs 1Password
- Ory Kratos vs authentik
- Ory Kratos vs Clerk
- Ory Kratos vs Trivy
- Ory Kratos vs LastPass
- Ory Kratos vs HashiCorp Vault
- Ory Kratos vs Bitwarden
- Ory Kratos vs Frontegg
- Ory Kratos vs Infisical
- Ory Kratos vs Semgrep
- Ory Kratos vs Envysion
- Ory Kratos vs Feedzai
- Ory Kratos vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Ory Kratos vs JumpCloud

