Cloud · head to head
Akamai vs Portworx

Portworx
Cloud
Kubernetes-native storage and data services, priced by the node hour
- From
- $0.33/node hour
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Akamai no public pricing available; custom quotes required; Portworx bare metal nodes are charged at 1.11 USD per node hour against 0.33 for virtual nodes, so a bare metal cluster costs more than three times a virtualised one for identical capability.
- They diverge on capability: Akamai covers CDN, Portworx covers Container-native volumes.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Akamai and Portworx actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Akamai
- CDN
- DDoS Protection
- Web Application Firewall
- Bot Management
- Image Optimization
- Video Platform
- API Gateway
- Analytics
Only in Portworx
- Container-native volumes
- Failure domain placement
- Volume encryption
- Database automation
- Disaster recovery
- Autopilot capacity management
- Hardware independence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Akamai
- Content delivery and web performance through Ion and adaptive media deliverynot Portworx
- DDoS protection, bot management and API securitynot Portworx
- Running compute, Kubernetes and managed databases on Akamai's cloudnot Portworx
- Edge compute with EdgeWorkersnot Portworx
- Zero trust access for enterprise applicationsnot Portworx
Portworx
- Running a production PostgreSQL or Cassandra cluster on Kubernetes and needing the data to survive node lossnot Akamai
- A platform team offering self-service databases to developers on an internal Kubernetes platformnot Akamai
- Failing over stateful applications between clusters in different regions as a disaster recovery positionnot Akamai
- An OpenShift estate where the built-in storage option does not meet the availability requirement for stateful setsnot Akamai
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Akamai
- No public pricing available; custom quotes required
- Sales-focused pricing model
Portworx
- Bare metal nodes are charged at 1.11 USD per node hour against 0.33 for virtual nodes, so a bare metal cluster costs more than three times a virtualised one for identical capability.
- A 1,000 node hour monthly minimum applies, which means small or intermittent clusters pay for capacity they do not consume.
- Replicating volumes across nodes consumes real capacity and network bandwidth, so the underlying infrastructure cost rises alongside the licence in a way the node hour rate does not show.
- Pure Storage ownership means roadmap priorities are set by an array vendor, and buyers should confirm that hardware independence remains contractual rather than assumed.
- Operating it well requires Kubernetes storage expertise, and teams that adopted Kubernetes to simplify operations often find they have added a distributed storage system to run.
Pricing, plan by plan
Akamai
$1000/month- CDN$1000/month
- Content delivery
- Global edge network
- Real-time analytics
- Security Suite$2000/month
- DDoS protection
- WAF
- Bot management
Portworx
$0.33/node hour- Portworx Enterprise on virtual machine nodes$0.33/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Replicated persistent volumes
- Encryption and disaster recovery
- Portworx Enterprise on bare metal nodes$1.11/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Same capabilities on bare metal clusters
- Higher rate reflects node density
Which should you pick?
Choose Portworx if
- You need container-native volumes.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want failure domain placement.
Questions people ask
- Is Akamai or Portworx better?
- Neither clearly leads. Akamai starts at $1000/month and Portworx at $0.33/node hour, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Akamai or Portworx?
- Akamai starts at $1000/month and Portworx at $0.33/node hour.
- Does Akamai or Portworx run on more platforms?
- Akamai runs on Web, Api. Portworx runs on Linux.
- What is Akamai best used for?
- Akamai is most often used for content delivery and web performance through ion and adaptive media delivery, ddos protection, bot management and api security, running compute, kubernetes and managed databases on akamai's cloud, edge compute with edgeworkers. Of those, content delivery and web performance through ion and adaptive media delivery and ddos protection, bot management and api security are not what Portworx is typically brought in for.
- What can Akamai do that Portworx cannot?
- Akamai covers CDN, DDoS Protection, Web Application Firewall, Bot Management. Portworx covers Container-native volumes, Failure domain placement, Volume encryption, Database automation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Akamai: How is Akamai pricing structured?
Akamai emphasizes straightforward pricing with no hidden fees, no egress surprises, and no vendor lock-in, but specific pricing is not published. Regional pricing pages exist for North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and other areas, with customers directed to contact sales.
SourcePortworx: Is Portworx tied to Pure Storage hardware?
No. It runs on any Kubernetes distribution over any underlying storage, though Pure has owned it since 2020 and sets the roadmap.
Akamai: Does Akamai offer a free trial?
Akamai offers a promotional trial with $100 in credits for Akamai Cloud, though conditions apply.
SourcePortworx: What does a real cluster cost?
At 0.33 USD per virtual node hour, twenty nodes running continuously is roughly 4,800 USD a month. Bare metal at 1.11 USD per node hour is around 16,000 USD for the same node count.
Portworx: Is backup included?
No. Portworx Backup is a separately priced product covering Kubernetes application backup.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Akamai vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Akamai vs DigitalOcean
- Akamai vs Grafana Cloud
- Akamai vs Neon
- Akamai vs Fastly
- Akamai vs Fly.io
- Akamai vs Cilium
- Akamai vs Google Cloud Platform
- Akamai vs Podman
- Akamai vs Vault
- Akamai vs K3s
- Akamai vs Lambda
- Akamai vs Beam Cloud
- Akamai vs Caddy
- Akamai vs Cerebrium
- Akamai vs DeepInfra
- Akamai vs Go
- Akamai vs OpenEBS
- Akamai vs Rancher
- Akamai vs Longhorn
- Akamai vs Scaleway
- Akamai vs Packer
- Akamai vs Crossplane
- Akamai vs Dokku
- Akamai vs Encore
- Akamai vs Flux
- Akamai vs Vagrant
- Akamai vs Kustomize
- Akamai vs minikube
- Portworx vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Portworx vs DigitalOcean
- Portworx vs Grafana Cloud
- Portworx vs Neon
- Portworx vs Fastly
- Portworx vs Fly.io
- Portworx vs Cilium
- Portworx vs Google Cloud Platform
- Portworx vs Podman
- Portworx vs Vault
- Portworx vs K3s
- Portworx vs Lambda
- Portworx vs Beam Cloud
- Portworx vs Caddy
- Portworx vs Cerebrium
- Portworx vs DeepInfra
- Portworx vs Go
- Portworx vs OpenEBS
- Portworx vs Rancher
- Portworx vs Longhorn
- Portworx vs Scaleway
- Portworx vs Packer
- Portworx vs Crossplane
- Portworx vs Dokku
- Portworx vs Encore
- Portworx vs Flux
- Portworx vs Vagrant
- Portworx vs Kustomize
- Portworx vs minikube

