Databases · head to head
Aiven vs Longhorn

Longhorn
Cloud
Open source distributed block storage for Kubernetes, incubating at the CNCF
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Aiven the free plan gives 1 VM with 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM and 1 GB storage, and cannot pick a specific cloud or region; Longhorn there is no vendor and no SLA, so a production incident at three in the morning is your own problem unless you buy SUSE Rancher Prime support separately.
- They diverge on capability: Aiven covers Multi-cloud Support, Longhorn covers Per-volume controllers.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aiven and Longhorn actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aiven
- Multi-cloud Support
- Automated Backups
- Seamless Upgrades
- VPC Peering
- End-to-end Encryption
- Compliance
- Observability
- PostgreSQL
Only in Longhorn
- Per-volume controllers
- Synchronous replication
- Snapshots and backups
- Volume expansion
- Disaster recovery volumes
- Web interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aiven
- Running managed open source databases without operating themnot Longhorn
- Multi-cloud deployment across AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, DigitalOcean, OVH and UpCloudnot Longhorn
- Highly available data services with automatic failovernot Longhorn
- Prototyping on a small free instance before scaling upnot Longhorn
Longhorn
- An on-premises Kubernetes cluster with local disks and no SAN that needs replicated persistent volumesnot Aiven
- Edge sites where shipping a storage array is impractical and three nodes is the whole clusternot Aiven
- A K3s deployment where the storage layer must be light enough to run alongside the workloadsnot Aiven
- A team that wants snapshots and S3 backups of persistent volumes without paying per-node storage licencesnot Aiven
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aiven
- The free plan gives 1 VM with 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM and 1 GB storage, and cannot pick a specific cloud or region
- Free and Developer tiers have no integrations and no connection pooling
- Connection pooling, database forks and dynamic disk sizing need the Business or Premium plan
- A 99.99 percent uptime SLA starts at the Startup plan from $75 a month
- High availability with automatic failover starts at Business from $180 a month
Longhorn
- There is no vendor and no SLA, so a production incident at three in the morning is your own problem unless you buy SUSE Rancher Prime support separately.
- Synchronous replication across nodes means write latency depends on the slowest replica and the network between nodes, which makes it a poor fit for latency-sensitive databases.
- Every replica is a full copy, so three-way replication consumes three times the raw capacity, unlike erasure-coded systems that are far more space efficient.
- It is designed for block storage on modest clusters and does not scale to the node counts or throughput that Ceph or a commercial array handles, so growth eventually forces a migration.
- Recovery from certain degraded states, such as a volume stuck detaching or replicas failing to rebuild, requires manual intervention and knowledge of Longhorn internals that is not widely held.
Pricing, plan by plan
Aiven
Free- Free TrialFree
- $300 credits
- 30 day trial
- All services
- Startup$19/month
- Single node
- Basic support
- Daily backups
Longhorn
Free- LonghornFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed, no licence fee
- Community support via GitHub and Slack only
- No vendor SLA or escalation path
Which should you pick?
Choose Aiven if
- You need multi-cloud support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp, Do.
- You also want automated backups.
Choose Longhorn if
- You need per-volume controllers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Kubernetes.
- You also want synchronous replication.
Questions people ask
- Is Aiven or Longhorn better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aiven starts at Free and Longhorn at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aiven or Longhorn?
- Aiven starts at Free and Longhorn at Free.
- Does Aiven or Longhorn run on more platforms?
- Aiven runs on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp, Do. Longhorn runs on Linux, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Aiven for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Aiven best used for?
- Aiven is most often used for running managed open source databases without operating them, multi-cloud deployment across aws, google cloud, azure, digitalocean, ovh and upcloud, highly available data services with automatic failover, prototyping on a small free instance before scaling up. Of those, running managed open source databases without operating them and multi-cloud deployment across aws, google cloud, azure, digitalocean, ovh and upcloud are not what Longhorn is typically brought in for.
- What can Aiven do that Longhorn cannot?
- Aiven covers Multi-cloud Support, Automated Backups, Seamless Upgrades, VPC Peering. Longhorn covers Per-volume controllers, Synchronous replication, Snapshots and backups, Volume expansion.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aiven: What does Aiven's free tier include and does it have any time limit?
The free tier includes PostgreSQL with 1 VM, 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM, and 1 GB storage with access to limited cloud and region selections. There are no time limitations on the free tier, though Aiven reserves the right to shut down accounts that violate policies or remain unused for extended periods.
SourceLonghorn: Who do we call when it breaks?
Nobody, unless you buy SUSE Rancher Prime, which includes commercial support for Longhorn. This is the decisive question for production use.
Aiven: How is Aiven billed and what are the monthly costs for each tier?
Aiven bills services by the hour and invoices monthly, charging only for what you actually run. PostgreSQL pricing starts at 5 dollars per month for Developer, 12 dollars per month for Hobbyist, 75 dollars per month for Startup, 180 dollars per month for Business, and 270 dollars per month for Premium. All paid tiers offer hourly billing options as well.
SourceLonghorn: How much capacity does replication cost?
Full copies, so three replicas means three times the raw capacity. Budget accordingly rather than assuming erasure coding efficiency.
Aiven: What backup retention periods are included at different Aiven tiers?
Backup retention increases with tier level: Startup tier provides 2 days of backup retention, Business tier offers 14 days, and Premium tier includes 30 days. Point-in-time restore is available on all paid tiers.
SourceLonghorn: Is it suitable for production databases?
For modest workloads yes, but synchronous replication adds write latency and high-transaction databases usually want something faster.
Aiven: Is high availability included in Aiven pricing or charged separately?
High availability, backups, and routine maintenance are all included in the tier costs with no separate charges. The Business tier includes 2 VMs with automatic failover, and Premium includes 3 VMs with a second standby node.
SourceAiven: Does Aiven offer a trial period to test premium features?
Aiven offers a 30-day free trial to access premium features beyond what the free plan provides.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Aiven vs PostgreSQL
- Aiven vs Instaclustr
- Aiven vs Amazon Aurora
- Aiven vs Cockroach Labs
- Aiven vs Airtable
- Aiven vs Google Cloud SQL
- Aiven vs Apache Kafka
- Aiven vs RabbitMQ
- Aiven vs Azure SQL
- Aiven vs MariaDB
- Aiven vs LanceDB
- Aiven vs Marqo
- Aiven vs Nile
- Aiven vs Ninox
- Aiven vs Presto
- Aiven vs Privacera
- Aiven vs Amazon RDS
- Aiven vs Apache Flink
- Aiven vs Portworx
- Aiven vs OpenEBS
- Aiven vs Proxmox VE
- Aiven vs Anyscale
- Aiven vs Go
- Aiven vs Rancher
- Aiven vs Packer
- Aiven vs DeepInfra
- Aiven vs Serverless Framework
- Aiven vs Coolify
- Aiven vs Puppet
- Aiven vs Qovery
- Aiven vs Porter
- Aiven vs VictoriaMetrics
- Aiven vs Vultr
- Aiven vs Akamai
- Aiven vs Vagrant
- Longhorn vs PostgreSQL
- Longhorn vs Instaclustr
- Longhorn vs Amazon Aurora
- Longhorn vs Cockroach Labs
- Longhorn vs Airtable
- Longhorn vs Google Cloud SQL
- Longhorn vs Apache Kafka
- Longhorn vs RabbitMQ
- Longhorn vs Azure SQL
- Longhorn vs MariaDB
- Longhorn vs LanceDB
- Longhorn vs Marqo
- Longhorn vs Nile
- Longhorn vs Ninox
- Longhorn vs Presto
- Longhorn vs Privacera
- Longhorn vs Amazon RDS
- Longhorn vs Apache Flink
- Longhorn vs Portworx
- Longhorn vs OpenEBS
- Longhorn vs Proxmox VE
- Longhorn vs Anyscale
- Longhorn vs Go
- Longhorn vs Rancher
- Longhorn vs Packer
- Longhorn vs DeepInfra
- Longhorn vs Serverless Framework
- Longhorn vs Coolify
- Longhorn vs Puppet
- Longhorn vs Qovery
- Longhorn vs Porter
- Longhorn vs VictoriaMetrics
- Longhorn vs Vultr
- Longhorn vs Akamai
- Longhorn vs Vagrant

