Databases · head to head
Aiven vs Kong Gateway

Kong Gateway
APIs
Open-source and cloud API gateway for managing microservices traffic
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Aiven the free plan gives 1 VM with 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM and 1 GB storage, and cannot pick a specific cloud or region; Kong Gateway the free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- They diverge on capability: Aiven covers Multi-cloud Support, Kong Gateway covers API request routing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aiven and Kong Gateway actually diverge.
| Attribute | Aiven | Kong Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | freemium |
| Platforms | Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp, Do | web, linux, api |
| Category | Databases | APIs |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aiven
- Multi-cloud Support
- Automated Backups
- Seamless Upgrades
- VPC Peering
- End-to-end Encryption
- Compliance
- Observability
- PostgreSQL
Only in Kong Gateway
- API request routing
- Plugin ecosystem
- Developer portals
- AI Gateway
- Analytics and observability
- SSO and audit logs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aiven
- Running managed open source databases without operating themnot Kong Gateway
- Multi-cloud deployment across AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, DigitalOcean, OVH and UpCloudnot Kong Gateway
- Highly available data services with automatic failovernot Kong Gateway
- Prototyping on a small free instance before scaling upnot Kong Gateway
Kong Gateway
- Routing and securing traffic across microservicesnot Aiven
- Publishing internal or external developer portalsnot Aiven
- Managing rate limits and authentication at the API edgenot Aiven
- Gateway-level routing to multiple LLM providersnot Aiven
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aiven
- The free plan gives 1 VM with 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM and 1 GB storage, and cannot pick a specific cloud or region
- Free and Developer tiers have no integrations and no connection pooling
- Connection pooling, database forks and dynamic disk sizing need the Business or Premium plan
- A 99.99 percent uptime SLA starts at the Startup plan from $75 a month
- High availability with automatic failover starts at Business from $180 a month
Kong Gateway
- The free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- Plus tier caps API requests at 1M/month before incurring per-million overage charges.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and not published, making budgeting harder without sales contact.
- Configuration and plugin management can require significant operational expertise to run at scale.
Pricing, plan by plan
Aiven
Free- Free TrialFree
- $300 credits
- 30 day trial
- All services
- Startup$19/month
- Single node
- Basic support
- Daily backups
Kong Gateway
Free- Free TrialFree
- 30-day enterprise functionality trial
- Unlimited gateways
- 30-day analytics retention
- Plus$undefined/month
- Up to 5 serverless, 2 hybrid, 2 dedicated cloud gateways
- 1M API requests/month included
- Up to 2 developer portals
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited hybrid and dedicated cloud gateways
- Unlimited developer portals
- SSO and audit logs
Which should you pick?
Choose Aiven if
- You need multi-cloud support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp, Do.
- You also want automated backups.
Choose Kong Gateway if
- You need api request routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, api.
- You also want plugin ecosystem.
Questions people ask
- Is Aiven or Kong Gateway better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aiven starts at Free and Kong Gateway at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aiven or Kong Gateway?
- Aiven starts at Free and Kong Gateway at Free.
- Does Aiven or Kong Gateway run on more platforms?
- Aiven runs on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp, Do. Kong Gateway runs on web, linux, api.
- Can I use Aiven for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Aiven best used for?
- Aiven is most often used for running managed open source databases without operating them, multi-cloud deployment across aws, google cloud, azure, digitalocean, ovh and upcloud, highly available data services with automatic failover, prototyping on a small free instance before scaling up. Of those, running managed open source databases without operating them and multi-cloud deployment across aws, google cloud, azure, digitalocean, ovh and upcloud are not what Kong Gateway is typically brought in for.
- What can Aiven do that Kong Gateway cannot?
- Aiven covers Multi-cloud Support, Automated Backups, Seamless Upgrades, VPC Peering. Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Plugin ecosystem, Developer portals, AI Gateway.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aiven: What does Aiven's free tier include and does it have any time limit?
The free tier includes PostgreSQL with 1 VM, 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM, and 1 GB storage with access to limited cloud and region selections. There are no time limitations on the free tier, though Aiven reserves the right to shut down accounts that violate policies or remain unused for extended periods.
SourceKong Gateway: Is Kong Gateway free?
Kong's core gateway is open source and free to self-host. Kong Konnect, the managed cloud platform, offers a 30-day free trial before moving to paid Plus or custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceAiven: How is Aiven billed and what are the monthly costs for each tier?
Aiven bills services by the hour and invoices monthly, charging only for what you actually run. PostgreSQL pricing starts at 5 dollars per month for Developer, 12 dollars per month for Hobbyist, 75 dollars per month for Startup, 180 dollars per month for Business, and 270 dollars per month for Premium. All paid tiers offer hourly billing options as well.
SourceKong Gateway: How is usage metered on the Plus plan?
The Plus plan includes 1M API requests per month, with additional usage billed at $200 per extra 1 million requests up to a 10M/month cap, plus per-gateway and per-LLM-model charges.
SourceAiven: What backup retention periods are included at different Aiven tiers?
Backup retention increases with tier level: Startup tier provides 2 days of backup retention, Business tier offers 14 days, and Premium tier includes 30 days. Point-in-time restore is available on all paid tiers.
SourceKong Gateway: What support is included?
Plus includes email support with a 2-business-day SLA, while Enterprise adds dedicated success managers and professional services.
SourceAiven: Is high availability included in Aiven pricing or charged separately?
High availability, backups, and routine maintenance are all included in the tier costs with no separate charges. The Business tier includes 2 VMs with automatic failover, and Premium includes 3 VMs with a second standby node.
SourceAiven: Does Aiven offer a trial period to test premium features?
Aiven offers a 30-day free trial to access premium features beyond what the free plan provides.
SourceRelated pages
More on Kong Gateway
Other head to heads
- Aiven vs PostgreSQL
- Aiven vs Instaclustr
- Aiven vs Amazon Aurora
- Aiven vs Cockroach Labs
- Aiven vs Airtable
- Aiven vs Google Cloud SQL
- Aiven vs Apache Kafka
- Aiven vs RabbitMQ
- Aiven vs Azure SQL
- Aiven vs MariaDB
- Aiven vs LanceDB
- Aiven vs Marqo
- Aiven vs Nile
- Aiven vs Ninox
- Aiven vs Presto
- Aiven vs Privacera
- Aiven vs Amazon RDS
- Aiven vs Apache Flink
- Aiven vs Tyk
- Aiven vs Moesif
- Aiven vs Treblle
- Aiven vs Convoy
- Aiven vs Janus Gateway
- Aiven vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Aiven vs Gravitee
- Aiven vs Strapi
- Aiven vs WSO2 API Manager
- Aiven vs AWS API Gateway
- Aiven vs GraphQL Apollo
- Aiven vs Appwrite
- Aiven vs Payload CMS
- Aiven vs Portkey
- Aiven vs Prisma
- Aiven vs RapidAPI
- Aiven vs REST Client VSCode
- Aiven vs Rutter
- Kong Gateway vs PostgreSQL
- Kong Gateway vs Instaclustr
- Kong Gateway vs Amazon Aurora
- Kong Gateway vs Cockroach Labs
- Kong Gateway vs Airtable
- Kong Gateway vs Google Cloud SQL
- Kong Gateway vs Apache Kafka
- Kong Gateway vs RabbitMQ
- Kong Gateway vs Azure SQL
- Kong Gateway vs MariaDB
- Kong Gateway vs LanceDB
- Kong Gateway vs Marqo
- Kong Gateway vs Nile
- Kong Gateway vs Ninox
- Kong Gateway vs Presto
- Kong Gateway vs Privacera
- Kong Gateway vs Amazon RDS
- Kong Gateway vs Apache Flink
- Kong Gateway vs Tyk
- Kong Gateway vs Moesif
- Kong Gateway vs Treblle
- Kong Gateway vs Convoy
- Kong Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Gravitee
- Kong Gateway vs Strapi
- Kong Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong Gateway vs AWS API Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs GraphQL Apollo
- Kong Gateway vs Appwrite
- Kong Gateway vs Payload CMS
- Kong Gateway vs Portkey
- Kong Gateway vs Prisma
- Kong Gateway vs RapidAPI
- Kong Gateway vs REST Client VSCode
- Kong Gateway vs Rutter

