Cybersecurity · head to head
Aikido vs Okteto

Aikido
Cybersecurity
Unified security platform automating vulnerability detection and fixing across development
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Okteto
Developer Tools
Runs production-like development environments on your own Kubernetes cluster
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Aikido free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images; Okteto two of the three plans publish no price at all, with no currency and no billing period stated anywhere, so any budget above five seats requires a sales conversation before you can even compare it with an alternative.
- They diverge on capability: Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Okteto covers Cluster development environments.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aikido and Okteto actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aikido
- Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
- Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
- AutoFix
- Secrets detection
- Cloud Security Posture Management
- AI-powered penetration testing
- Device protection
- False positive reduction
Only in Okteto
- Cluster development environments
- File synchronisation
- Development containers
- Environment catalogue
- Preview environments
- Bring your own cloud
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aikido
- Developer-friendly security integrated into PR workflowsnot Okteto
- Automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alertsnot Okteto
- Consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecyclenot Okteto
- Cloud infrastructure security posture monitoringnot Okteto
- Supply chain attack prevention and malware detectionnot Okteto
Okteto
- A microservices estate where no developer can run the full dependency graph on a laptopnot Aikido
- Giving each pull request a working environment reviewers can click rather than describenot Aikido
- Letting coding agents build and test against real databases and queues instead of mocksnot Aikido
- Removing a fleet of local Kubernetes installations that drift from production and produce false test resultsnot Aikido
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aikido
- Free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images
- Pricing increases significantly with user and repository scale
- Advanced features like penetration testing and VM scanning limited to higher tiers
- Device protection limited to Development environments only
- Requires multiple plan tiers for full platform coverage
Okteto
- Two of the three plans publish no price at all, with no currency and no billing period stated anywhere, so any budget above five seats requires a sales conversation before you can even compare it with an alternative.
- The Apache-2.0 CLI is restricted to the development section of the manifest, so build services, user management and observability all require the commercial platform and the open licence provides very little continuity insurance.
- The last disclosed funding round is a 15 million US dollar Series A from February 2022 with nothing announced since, and the contributor base is dominated by company employees, which is concentrated risk for something embedded in every developer daily loop.
- You must bring and pay for the Kubernetes cluster, so node cost, capacity planning and version upgrades stay with your platform team on top of the licence fee.
- The 2026 repositioning towards AI agents means the classic developer inner loop is no longer what the marketing leads with, so a buyer purchasing that use case should confirm roadmap commitment rather than assume it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Aikido
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to 2 users
- Dependency scanning (SCA)
- SAST and AI SAST
- Pro$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Basic features
- On-premise scanning
- Advanced$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Pro features
- Broker for internal apps
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing for tailored modules
- Dedicated account management
- Custom SLAs
Okteto
Free- StarterFree
- 5 seats included
- Self-hosted deployment into your own cluster
- Community support
- Scale$undefined/year
- Contact sales, no price, currency or billing period published
- More seats and environments than Starter
- Self-hosted deployment
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Contact sales, no price published
- Bring your own cloud deployment
- Available through Google Cloud and AWS marketplaces
Which should you pick?
Choose Aikido if
- You need static application security testing (sast).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CI/CD, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis (sca).
Choose Okteto if
- You need cluster development environments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, CLI, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want file synchronisation.
Questions people ask
- Is Aikido or Okteto better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aikido starts at Free and Okteto at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aikido or Okteto?
- Aikido starts at Free and Okteto at Free.
- Does Aikido or Okteto run on more platforms?
- Aikido runs on Web, CI/CD, IDE. Okteto runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, CLI, Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use Aikido for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Aikido best used for?
- Aikido is most often used for developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows, automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts, consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecycle, cloud infrastructure security posture monitoring. Of those, developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows and automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts are not what Okteto is typically brought in for.
- What can Aikido do that Okteto cannot?
- Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), AutoFix, Secrets detection. Okteto covers Cluster development environments, File synchronisation, Development containers, Environment catalogue.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aikido: What is included in Aikido's free Developer plan?
The free Developer plan includes up to 2 users with SAST, SCA, secrets detection, cloud scanning, and license risk detection. Fair-usage limits apply: 10 repos, 2 container images, 1 domain, and 1 cloud account.
SourceOkteto: Is Okteto open source?
The CLI is Apache-2.0, but the README states it supports only the development section of the manifest. Everything operationally interesting, including builds, user management and observability, is in the commercial platform.
Aikido: What is AutoFix and how does it work?
AutoFix is Aikido's automated vulnerability remediation feature that identifies vulnerabilities and suggests or applies specific code fixes automatically, reducing manual remediation effort.
SourceOkteto: What does it cost?
Only the free Starter tier with five seats is published. Scale and Enterprise are both contact sales, with no price, currency or billing period disclosed on the pricing page.
Aikido: How many false positives does Aikido reduce?
Aikido reduces false positives by 99%, using AI-powered context awareness to filter noise and focus on vulnerabilities that present real business risk.
SourceOkteto: Do I need my own Kubernetes cluster?
Yes. Okteto installs into a cluster you provide and pay for, so capacity, upgrades and node costs remain your responsibility in addition to the licence.
Aikido: What integrations does Aikido support?
Aikido integrates with Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams, GitHub, GitLab, and other popular development tools to fit into existing workflows.
SourceOkteto: How is this different from running Kubernetes locally?
Environments run against the same managed databases, queues and service mesh as production, so a class of failures that only appears in a real cluster is caught before merge rather than after deploy.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Aikido vs Snyk
- Aikido vs Veracode
- Aikido vs Tenable
- Aikido vs Legit Security
- Aikido vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Aikido vs Qualys VMDR
- Aikido vs Arnica
- Aikido vs Sysdig
- Aikido vs Akeyless
- Aikido vs Infisical
- Aikido vs Tanium
- Aikido vs Doppler
- Aikido vs Passbolt
- Aikido vs Ping Identity
- Aikido vs Proofpoint
- Aikido vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Aikido vs Recorded Future
- Aikido vs Tilt
- Aikido vs Garden
- Aikido vs Argo CD
- Aikido vs Atlantis
- Aikido vs Nix
- Aikido vs Spacelift
- Aikido vs ConfigCat
- Aikido vs Restate
- Aikido vs Helm
- Aikido vs StackBlitz
- Aikido vs Avo
- Aikido vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Aikido vs Nixpacks
- Aikido vs Octopus Deploy
- Aikido vs OpsLevel
- Aikido vs PartyKit
- Aikido vs PhpStorm
- Okteto vs Snyk
- Okteto vs Veracode
- Okteto vs Tenable
- Okteto vs Legit Security
- Okteto vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Okteto vs Qualys VMDR
- Okteto vs Arnica
- Okteto vs Sysdig
- Okteto vs Akeyless
- Okteto vs Infisical
- Okteto vs Tanium
- Okteto vs Doppler
- Okteto vs Passbolt
- Okteto vs Ping Identity
- Okteto vs Proofpoint
- Okteto vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Okteto vs Recorded Future
- Okteto vs Tilt
- Okteto vs Garden
- Okteto vs Argo CD
- Okteto vs Atlantis
- Okteto vs Nix
- Okteto vs Spacelift
- Okteto vs ConfigCat
- Okteto vs Restate
- Okteto vs Helm
- Okteto vs StackBlitz
- Okteto vs Avo
- Okteto vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Okteto vs Nixpacks
- Okteto vs Octopus Deploy
- Okteto vs OpsLevel
- Okteto vs PartyKit
- Okteto vs PhpStorm
