Cybersecurity · head to head
Aikido vs Bonfire

Aikido
Cybersecurity
Unified security platform automating vulnerability detection and fixing across development
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Bonfire
Government
Public sector sourcing and bid evaluation software with scored, auditable award decisions
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Aikido has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Aikido free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images; Bonfire it is a sourcing and evaluation tool rather than full procure to pay, so requisitions, purchase orders and invoicing stay in the finance system and the join between them is the agency's problem.
- They diverge on capability: Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Bonfire covers Solicitation posting.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aikido and Bonfire actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aikido
- Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
- Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
- AutoFix
- Secrets detection
- Cloud Security Posture Management
- AI-powered penetration testing
- Device protection
- False positive reduction
Only in Bonfire
- Solicitation posting
- Sealed submission intake
- Scored evaluation workspace
- Audit trail
- Supplier portal
- Requirement matrices
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aikido
- Developer-friendly security integrated into PR workflowsnot Bonfire
- Automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alertsnot Bonfire
- Consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecyclenot Bonfire
- Cloud infrastructure security posture monitoringnot Bonfire
- Supply chain attack prevention and malware detectionnot Bonfire
Bonfire
- An agency that has lost or nearly lost a bid protest and needs a defensible evaluation recordnot Aikido
- A procurement team running scoring committees currently held together by spreadsheets and emailnot Aikido
- A university or health system applying public procurement rules without a public procurement systemnot Aikido
- An agency wanting suppliers to self register and receive addenda automatically rather than by mailing listnot Aikido
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aikido
- Free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images
- Pricing increases significantly with user and repository scale
- Advanced features like penetration testing and VM scanning limited to higher tiers
- Device protection limited to Development environments only
- Requires multiple plan tiers for full platform coverage
Bonfire
- It is a sourcing and evaluation tool rather than full procure to pay, so requisitions, purchase orders and invoicing stay in the finance system and the join between them is the agency's problem.
- Since the acquisition path from GTY to GI Partners to Euna Solutions, Bonfire sits in a portfolio alongside products it once competed with, which narrows a shortlist that appears independent.
- Suppliers must register on the portal to bid, and small local vendors reliably complain about the extra account, which can reduce responses on low value solicitations.
- Pricing is quoted rather than published and scales with solicitation volume, so an agency with a few very large procurements pays a model designed around throughput.
- Contract management after award is thin compared with dedicated contract lifecycle products, so agencies often buy a second system for the obligations the award created.
Pricing, plan by plan
Aikido
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to 2 users
- Dependency scanning (SCA)
- SAST and AI SAST
- Pro$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Basic features
- On-premise scanning
- Advanced$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Pro features
- Broker for internal apps
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing for tailored modules
- Dedicated account management
- Custom SLAs
Bonfire
On request- Bonfire$undefined/year
- Quoted by agency size and annual solicitation volume
- Supplier side registration is free, which is how the vendor network grows
- Implementation and training quoted separately from subscription
Which should you pick?
Choose Aikido if
- You need static application security testing (sast).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CI/CD, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis (sca).
Choose Bonfire if
- You need solicitation posting.
- You also want sealed submission intake.
Questions people ask
- Is Aikido or Bonfire better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aikido starts at Free and Bonfire at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aikido or Bonfire?
- Aikido has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Aikido and On request for Bonfire.
- Does Aikido or Bonfire run on more platforms?
- Aikido runs on Web, CI/CD, IDE. Bonfire runs on Web.
- Can I use Aikido for free?
- Yes. Aikido has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Bonfire starts at On request.
- What is Aikido best used for?
- Aikido is most often used for developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows, automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts, consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecycle, cloud infrastructure security posture monitoring. Of those, developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows and automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts are not what Bonfire is typically brought in for.
- What can Aikido do that Bonfire cannot?
- Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), AutoFix, Secrets detection. Bonfire covers Solicitation posting, Sealed submission intake, Scored evaluation workspace, Audit trail.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aikido: What is included in Aikido's free Developer plan?
The free Developer plan includes up to 2 users with SAST, SCA, secrets detection, cloud scanning, and license risk detection. Fair-usage limits apply: 10 repos, 2 container images, 1 domain, and 1 cloud account.
SourceBonfire: Who owns Bonfire?
Euna Solutions. Bonfire was acquired by GTY Technology in 2019, GTY was taken private by GI Partners in 2022, and the portfolio was rebranded Euna Solutions in 2023.
Aikido: What is AutoFix and how does it work?
AutoFix is Aikido's automated vulnerability remediation feature that identifies vulnerabilities and suggests or applies specific code fixes automatically, reducing manual remediation effort.
SourceBonfire: Is it full procure to pay?
No. It covers sourcing and evaluation through award. Purchase orders and invoicing remain in the finance system.
Aikido: How many false positives does Aikido reduce?
Aikido reduces false positives by 99%, using AI-powered context awareness to filter noise and focus on vulnerabilities that present real business risk.
SourceBonfire: What is the real value?
A defensible, time stamped evaluation record when an award is protested, which is the expensive failure mode in public procurement.
Aikido: What integrations does Aikido support?
Aikido integrates with Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams, GitHub, GitLab, and other popular development tools to fit into existing workflows.
SourceBonfire: Can we see what other agencies pay?
Yes. These contracts are public records. Read several comparable awards before negotiating.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Aikido vs Snyk
- Aikido vs Veracode
- Aikido vs Tenable
- Aikido vs Legit Security
- Aikido vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Aikido vs Qualys VMDR
- Aikido vs Arnica
- Aikido vs Sysdig
- Aikido vs Akeyless
- Aikido vs Infisical
- Aikido vs Tanium
- Aikido vs Doppler
- Aikido vs Passbolt
- Aikido vs Ping Identity
- Aikido vs Proofpoint
- Aikido vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Aikido vs Recorded Future
- Aikido vs Bidnet Direct
- Aikido vs Periscope Holdings
- Aikido vs NEOGOV
- Aikido vs ArchiveSocial
- Aikido vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Aikido vs mySidewalk
- Aikido vs SAP for Government
- Aikido vs Clariti
- Aikido vs GovPilot
- Aikido vs Zencity
- Aikido vs Tyler Technologies
- Aikido vs Polco
- Aikido vs SafeCity
- Aikido vs SeeClickFix
- Aikido vs ShotSpotter
- Aikido vs Springbrook Software
- Aikido vs Rock Solid
- Bonfire vs Snyk
- Bonfire vs Veracode
- Bonfire vs Tenable
- Bonfire vs Legit Security
- Bonfire vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Bonfire vs Qualys VMDR
- Bonfire vs Arnica
- Bonfire vs Sysdig
- Bonfire vs Akeyless
- Bonfire vs Infisical
- Bonfire vs Tanium
- Bonfire vs Doppler
- Bonfire vs Passbolt
- Bonfire vs Ping Identity
- Bonfire vs Proofpoint
- Bonfire vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Bonfire vs Recorded Future
- Bonfire vs Bidnet Direct
- Bonfire vs Periscope Holdings
- Bonfire vs NEOGOV
- Bonfire vs ArchiveSocial
- Bonfire vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Bonfire vs mySidewalk
- Bonfire vs SAP for Government
- Bonfire vs Clariti
- Bonfire vs GovPilot
- Bonfire vs Zencity
- Bonfire vs Tyler Technologies
- Bonfire vs Polco
- Bonfire vs SafeCity
- Bonfire vs SeeClickFix
- Bonfire vs ShotSpotter
- Bonfire vs Springbrook Software
- Bonfire vs Rock Solid
