Cybersecurity · head to head
Aikido vs Polco

Aikido
Cybersecurity
Unified security platform automating vulnerability detection and fixing across development
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Aikido has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Aikido free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images; Polco interface has a formal, academic tone compared to modern civic engagement platforms
- They diverge on capability: Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Polco covers Scientific Surveys.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aikido and Polco actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aikido
- Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
- Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
- AutoFix
- Secrets detection
- Cloud Security Posture Management
- AI-powered penetration testing
- Device protection
- False positive reduction
Only in Polco
- Scientific Surveys
- Live Polling
- Community Benchmarking
- Priority-Based Budgeting
- Demographic Analysis
- NRC Surveys
- ArcGIS
- Social Media
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aikido
- Developer-friendly security integrated into PR workflowsnot Polco
- Automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alertsnot Polco
- Consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecyclenot Polco
- Cloud infrastructure security posture monitoringnot Polco
- Supply chain attack prevention and malware detectionnot Polco
Polco
- Citizen Servicesnot Aikido
- Records Managementnot Aikido
- Public Safetynot Aikido
- Civic Engagementnot Aikido
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aikido
- Free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images
- Pricing increases significantly with user and repository scale
- Advanced features like penetration testing and VM scanning limited to higher tiers
- Device protection limited to Development environments only
- Requires multiple plan tiers for full platform coverage
Polco
- Interface has a formal, academic tone compared to modern civic engagement platforms
- Emphasizes surveys and benchmarking over open discussion forums and idea boards
- Pricing is custom quote-based without transparent pricing on the website
Pricing, plan by plan
Aikido
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to 2 users
- Dependency scanning (SCA)
- SAST and AI SAST
- Pro$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Basic features
- On-premise scanning
- Advanced$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Pro features
- Broker for internal apps
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing for tailored modules
- Dedicated account management
- Custom SLAs
Polco
$300/month- Community Engagement$300/month
- Community Surveys
- Live Polling
- Benchmarking
Which should you pick?
Choose Aikido if
- You need static application security testing (sast).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CI/CD, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis (sca).
Choose Polco if
- You need scientific surveys.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want live polling.
Questions people ask
- Is Aikido or Polco better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aikido starts at Free and Polco at $300/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aikido or Polco?
- Aikido has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Aikido and $300/month for Polco.
- Does Aikido or Polco run on more platforms?
- Aikido runs on Web, CI/CD, IDE. Polco runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- Can I use Aikido for free?
- Yes. Aikido has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Polco starts at $300/month.
- What is Aikido best used for?
- Aikido is most often used for developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows, automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts, consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecycle, cloud infrastructure security posture monitoring. Of those, developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows and automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts are not what Polco is typically brought in for.
- What can Aikido do that Polco cannot?
- Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), AutoFix, Secrets detection. Polco covers Scientific Surveys, Live Polling, Community Benchmarking, Priority-Based Budgeting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aikido: What is included in Aikido's free Developer plan?
The free Developer plan includes up to 2 users with SAST, SCA, secrets detection, cloud scanning, and license risk detection. Fair-usage limits apply: 10 repos, 2 container images, 1 domain, and 1 cloud account.
SourcePolco: How does Polco ensure survey data quality?
Polco uses scientific survey methodology through the National Research Center, with pre-tested survey questions and verification that participants live in the surveyed area to eliminate outside interference and bad-faith responses.
SourceAikido: What is AutoFix and how does it work?
AutoFix is Aikido's automated vulnerability remediation feature that identifies vulnerabilities and suggests or applies specific code fixes automatically, reducing manual remediation effort.
SourcePolco: What's the difference between Polco and open discussion platforms?
Polco emphasizes scientific surveys and benchmarking over open forums or suggestion boards, prioritizing rigorous data collection for policy decisions over broad community brainstorming.
SourceAikido: How many false positives does Aikido reduce?
Aikido reduces false positives by 99%, using AI-powered context awareness to filter noise and focus on vulnerabilities that present real business risk.
SourceAikido: What integrations does Aikido support?
Aikido integrates with Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams, GitHub, GitLab, and other popular development tools to fit into existing workflows.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Aikido vs Snyk
- Aikido vs Veracode
- Aikido vs Tenable
- Aikido vs Legit Security
- Aikido vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Aikido vs Qualys VMDR
- Aikido vs Arnica
- Aikido vs Sysdig
- Aikido vs Akeyless
- Aikido vs Infisical
- Aikido vs Tanium
- Aikido vs Doppler
- Aikido vs Passbolt
- Aikido vs Ping Identity
- Aikido vs Proofpoint
- Aikido vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Aikido vs Recorded Future
- Aikido vs CivicPlus
- Aikido vs PublicInput
- Aikido vs Granicus
- Aikido vs mySidewalk
- Aikido vs Zencity
- Aikido vs Accela
- Aikido vs CitizenLab
- Aikido vs Bonfire
- Aikido vs CentralSquare
- Aikido vs CityView
- Aikido vs IAPro
- Aikido vs iCompass
- Aikido vs Mapbox Government
- Aikido vs Mark43
- Aikido vs MuckRock
- Aikido vs Municode
- Aikido vs Bang the Table
- Aikido vs Legistar
- Polco vs Snyk
- Polco vs Veracode
- Polco vs Tenable
- Polco vs Legit Security
- Polco vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Polco vs Qualys VMDR
- Polco vs Arnica
- Polco vs Sysdig
- Polco vs Akeyless
- Polco vs Infisical
- Polco vs Tanium
- Polco vs Doppler
- Polco vs Passbolt
- Polco vs Ping Identity
- Polco vs Proofpoint
- Polco vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Polco vs Recorded Future
- Polco vs CivicPlus
- Polco vs PublicInput
- Polco vs Granicus
- Polco vs mySidewalk
- Polco vs Zencity
- Polco vs Accela
- Polco vs CitizenLab
- Polco vs Bonfire
- Polco vs CentralSquare
- Polco vs CityView
- Polco vs IAPro
- Polco vs iCompass
- Polco vs Mapbox Government
- Polco vs Mark43
- Polco vs MuckRock
- Polco vs Municode
- Polco vs Bang the Table
- Polco vs Legistar

