Cybersecurity · head to head
Aikido vs Azure Functions

Aikido
Cybersecurity
Unified security platform automating vulnerability detection and fixing across development
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Aikido free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images; Azure Functions consumption plan free grant is capped at 1 million executions and 400,000 GB-seconds of resource consumption per month per subscription, billed per GB-second beyond that
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aikido and Azure Functions actually diverge.
| Attribute | Aikido | Azure Functions |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Subscription with free tier | usage-based |
| Platforms | Web, CI/CD, IDE | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Cloud |
| Founded | 2022 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aikido
- Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
- Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
- AutoFix
- Secrets detection
- Cloud Security Posture Management
- AI-powered penetration testing
- Device protection
- False positive reduction
Only in Azure Functions
Nothing recorded that Aikido does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aikido
- Developer-friendly security integrated into PR workflowsnot Azure Functions
- Automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alertsnot Azure Functions
- Consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecyclenot Azure Functions
- Cloud infrastructure security posture monitoringnot Azure Functions
- Supply chain attack prevention and malware detectionnot Azure Functions
Azure Functions
- Event-driven computingnot Aikido
- Serverless application backendnot Aikido
- Scalable API endpointsnot Aikido
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aikido
- Free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images
- Pricing increases significantly with user and repository scale
- Advanced features like penetration testing and VM scanning limited to higher tiers
- Device protection limited to Development environments only
- Requires multiple plan tiers for full platform coverage
Azure Functions
- Consumption plan free grant is capped at 1 million executions and 400,000 GB-seconds of resource consumption per month per subscription, billed per GB-second beyond that
- The newer Flex Consumption plan's free grant is smaller still, at 250,000 executions and 100,000 GB-seconds per month
- Premium plan avoids per-execution charges but bills continuously for allocated core seconds and memory regardless of invocation volume
- Memory is rounded up to the nearest 128 MB and execution time to the nearest 1 ms for billing, so small overages round upward
Pricing, plan by plan
Aikido
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to 2 users
- Dependency scanning (SCA)
- SAST and AI SAST
- Pro$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Basic features
- On-premise scanning
- Advanced$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Pro features
- Broker for internal apps
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing for tailored modules
- Dedicated account management
- Custom SLAs
Azure Functions
Free- Consumption Plan$null/month
- 1 million requests free monthly
- 400,000 GB-seconds free monthly
- Billed per second and executions
- Flex Consumption Plan$null/month
- 250,000 executions free monthly
- 100,000 GB-seconds free monthly
- Event-driven scaling
- Premium Plan$null/month
- No execution charges
- At least one instance required
- Includes automatic scaling and VNET access
Which should you pick?
Choose Aikido if
- You need static application security testing (sast).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CI/CD, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis (sca).
Questions people ask
- Is Aikido or Azure Functions better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aikido starts at Free and Azure Functions at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aikido or Azure Functions?
- Aikido starts at Free and Azure Functions at Free.
- Does Aikido or Azure Functions run on more platforms?
- Aikido runs on Web, CI/CD, IDE. Azure Functions runs on Web.
- Can I use Aikido for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Aikido best used for?
- Aikido is most often used for developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows, automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts, consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecycle, cloud infrastructure security posture monitoring. Of those, developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows and automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts are not what Azure Functions is typically brought in for.
- What can Aikido do that Azure Functions cannot?
- Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), AutoFix, Secrets detection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aikido: What is included in Aikido's free Developer plan?
The free Developer plan includes up to 2 users with SAST, SCA, secrets detection, cloud scanning, and license risk detection. Fair-usage limits apply: 10 repos, 2 container images, 1 domain, and 1 cloud account.
SourceAzure Functions: Does Azure Functions have a free tier?
Yes, Azure Functions includes a monthly free grant of 1 million requests and 400,000 GB-seconds on the Consumption Plan, or 250,000 executions and 100,000 GB-seconds on Flex Consumption.
SourceAikido: What is AutoFix and how does it work?
AutoFix is Aikido's automated vulnerability remediation feature that identifies vulnerabilities and suggests or applies specific code fixes automatically, reducing manual remediation effort.
SourceAzure Functions: What is Azure Functions' pricing model?
Azure Functions uses usage-based pricing. Consumption plans charge per second of resource consumption and per execution, measured in gigabyte-seconds and rounded to the nearest 128 MB.
SourceAikido: How many false positives does Aikido reduce?
Aikido reduces false positives by 99%, using AI-powered context awareness to filter noise and focus on vulnerabilities that present real business risk.
SourceAzure Functions: What is the minimum execution time for Azure Functions?
The minimum execution time is 100 milliseconds on Consumption plans. Premium plans charge based on core seconds and allocated memory.
SourceAikido: What integrations does Aikido support?
Aikido integrates with Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams, GitHub, GitLab, and other popular development tools to fit into existing workflows.
SourceRelated pages
More on Azure Functions
Other head to heads
- Aikido vs 1Password
- Aikido vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Aikido vs Norton 360
- Aikido vs LastPass
- Aikido vs Snyk
- Aikido vs Bitwarden
- Aikido vs Brave Browser
- Aikido vs Clerk
- Aikido vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Aikido vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Aikido vs Mullvad VPN
- Aikido vs OneTrust
- Aikido vs Private Internet Access
- Aikido vs Proton Mail
- Aikido vs Tuta
- Aikido vs Akeyless
- Aikido vs Doppler
- Aikido vs Frontegg
- Aikido vs Grafana Cloud
- Aikido vs Neon
- Aikido vs DigitalOcean
- Aikido vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Aikido vs Pulumi
- Aikido vs Fly.io
- Aikido vs Anyscale
- Aikido vs Fireworks AI
- Aikido vs Podman
- Aikido vs Railway
- Aikido vs Render
- Aikido vs Vault
- Aikido vs Wiz
- Aikido vs Beam Cloud
- Aikido vs Cerebrium
- Aikido vs DeepInfra
- Aikido vs Go
- Aikido vs Caddy
- Azure Functions vs 1Password
- Azure Functions vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Azure Functions vs Norton 360
- Azure Functions vs LastPass
- Azure Functions vs Snyk
- Azure Functions vs Bitwarden
- Azure Functions vs Brave Browser
- Azure Functions vs Clerk
- Azure Functions vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Azure Functions vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Azure Functions vs Mullvad VPN
- Azure Functions vs OneTrust
- Azure Functions vs Private Internet Access
- Azure Functions vs Proton Mail
- Azure Functions vs Tuta
- Azure Functions vs Akeyless
- Azure Functions vs Doppler
- Azure Functions vs Frontegg
- Azure Functions vs Grafana Cloud
- Azure Functions vs Neon
- Azure Functions vs DigitalOcean
- Azure Functions vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Azure Functions vs Pulumi
- Azure Functions vs Fly.io
- Azure Functions vs Anyscale
- Azure Functions vs Fireworks AI
- Azure Functions vs Podman
- Azure Functions vs Railway
- Azure Functions vs Render
- Azure Functions vs Vault
- Azure Functions vs Wiz
- Azure Functions vs Beam Cloud
- Azure Functions vs Cerebrium
- Azure Functions vs DeepInfra
- Azure Functions vs Go
- Azure Functions vs Caddy

