Cloud · head to head
Zeabur vs Thanos

Thanos
Cloud
Highly available Prometheus with long-term object storage
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Zeabur free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention; Thanos several components — sidecar, store, querier, compactor, ruler — each with its own configuration and failure modes
- They diverge on capability: Zeabur covers AI Agent, Thanos covers Global query.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Zeabur and Thanos actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Zeabur
- AI Agent
- Managed Servers
- Domain and DNS Management
- Email Service
- AI Hub
- Deploy Templates
- Git Integration
Only in Thanos
- Global query
- Object storage retention
- Deduplication
- Downsampling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Zeabur
- Deploying full-stack web applications without DevOps expertisenot Thanos
- Building AI agent infrastructure with integrated API accessnot Thanos
- Managing multi-region deployments with automated scalingnot Thanos
- Running containerized services with built-in domain and emailnot Thanos
Thanos
- Querying metrics across many clusters or regions from one placenot Zeabur
- Retaining metrics for years without local disk growthnot Zeabur
- Removing the gap that appears when a single Prometheus instance restartsnot Zeabur
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Zeabur
- Free plan limited to single server with 48-hour log retention
- Small team size may limit support and feature velocity
- Building spec upgrades limited on lower tiers
- Enterprise support not clearly documented
Thanos
- Several components — sidecar, store, querier, compactor, ruler — each with its own configuration and failure modes
- The compactor is a common source of operational trouble and must not run twice against the same bucket
- Query latency over object storage is meaningfully higher than local Prometheus
- Object storage costs and API request charges become real at high volume
Pricing, plan by plan
Zeabur
Free- FreeFree
- 1 manageable server
- 2C4G build specs
- 48-hour log retention
- Dev$5/month
- 3 manageable servers
- 7-day log retention
- 250 MB file uploads
- Pro$19/month
- 10 manageable servers
- 4C8G build specs
- 30-day log retention
- Team$79/month
- 3 included seats
- Unlimited manageable servers
- 90-day log retention
Thanos
Free- ThanosFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Zeabur if
- You need ai agent.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI.
- You also want managed servers.
Choose Thanos if
- You need global query.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Linux, Docker.
- You also want object storage retention.
Questions people ask
- Is Zeabur or Thanos better?
- Neither clearly leads. Zeabur starts at Free and Thanos at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Zeabur or Thanos?
- Zeabur starts at Free and Thanos at Free.
- Does Zeabur or Thanos run on more platforms?
- Zeabur runs on Web, CLI. Thanos runs on Kubernetes, Linux, Docker.
- Can I use Zeabur for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Zeabur best used for?
- Zeabur is most often used for deploying full-stack web applications without devops expertise, building ai agent infrastructure with integrated api access, managing multi-region deployments with automated scaling, running containerized services with built-in domain and email. Of those, deploying full-stack web applications without devops expertise and building ai agent infrastructure with integrated api access are not what Thanos is typically brought in for.
- What can Zeabur do that Thanos cannot?
- Zeabur covers AI Agent, Managed Servers, Domain and DNS Management, Email Service. Thanos covers Global query, Object storage retention, Deduplication, Downsampling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Zeabur: What is included in the free plan?
The free plan includes 1 manageable server, 2C4G build specifications, 48-hour log retention, 50 MB file upload limit, and community support.
SourceThanos: Is Thanos free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-incubating. Costs are the object storage it uses.
Zeabur: How do additional seats work on the Team plan?
The Team plan includes 3 seats with additional seats available at $24 per seat per month.
SourceThanos: Does Thanos replace Prometheus?
No. It runs alongside existing Prometheus servers, adding global query, deduplication and long-term storage.
Zeabur: Is there a free trial period?
The Dev and Pro plans include 14 days free before billing begins.
SourceThanos: Thanos or VictoriaMetrics?
Thanos layers onto Prometheus using object storage and is the more established multi-cluster answer. VictoriaMetrics is a separate store aiming at lower resource use and fewer moving parts.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Zeabur vs Grafana Cloud
- Zeabur vs Neon
- Zeabur vs DigitalOcean
- Zeabur vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Zeabur vs Pulumi
- Zeabur vs Fly.io
- Zeabur vs Anyscale
- Zeabur vs Fireworks AI
- Zeabur vs Podman
- Zeabur vs Railway
- Zeabur vs Render
- Zeabur vs Vault
- Zeabur vs Wiz
- Zeabur vs Beam Cloud
- Zeabur vs Cerebrium
- Zeabur vs DeepInfra
- Zeabur vs Go
- Zeabur vs Azure Functions
- Thanos vs Grafana Cloud
- Thanos vs Neon
- Thanos vs DigitalOcean
- Thanos vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Thanos vs Pulumi
- Thanos vs Fly.io
- Thanos vs Anyscale
- Thanos vs Fireworks AI
- Thanos vs Podman
- Thanos vs Railway
- Thanos vs Render
- Thanos vs Vault
- Thanos vs Wiz
- Thanos vs Beam Cloud
- Thanos vs Cerebrium
- Thanos vs DeepInfra
- Thanos vs Go
- Thanos vs Azure Functions

