Softwr

Utilities · head to head

Rufus vs Ventoy

Rufus logo

Rufus

Utilities

Create bootable USB drives on Windows

From
Free
Rated
-
Ventoy logo

Ventoy

Utilities

Multiboot USB creator that boots ISO files copied onto an ordinary partition

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Rufus windows only, with no macOS or Linux build; Ventoy the repository ships prebuilt binaries that are difficult to reproduce from source, so several Linux distributions refuse to package it and security teams in regulated organisations will usually reject it.
  • They diverge on capability: Rufus covers Bootable USB creation, Ventoy covers In-place ISO boot.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Rufus and Ventoy actually diverge.

Attributes where Rufus and Ventoy differ
AttributeRufusVentoy
PlatformsWindowsWindows, Linux

Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Open source, no licence fee), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Utilities).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Rufus

  • Bootable USB creation
  • No installation
  • Partition scheme control
  • Windows install customisation

Only in Ventoy

  • In-place ISO boot
  • Persistent overlays
  • Plugin configuration
  • Secure Boot support
  • Multi-format boot
  • Non-destructive install

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Rufus

  • Writing a Linux or Windows installer to a USB sticknot Ventoy
  • Creating live USB media with a persistent partitionnot Ventoy
  • Recovering a machine that will not boot from its internal drivenot Ventoy

Ventoy

  • Field technicians who need one stick carrying several Windows and Linux installers plus a rescue environmentnot Rufus
  • Labs that reimage machines weekly and want to swap a single ISO rather than rewrite the drivenot Rufus
  • Testing a new distribution release without destroying the existing set of imagesnot Rufus
  • Unattended installation runs where answer files sit beside the ISOs on the same partitionnot Rufus

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Rufus

  • Windows only, with no macOS or Linux build
  • Single-purpose: it writes drives and does nothing else
  • Some of its Windows setup bypass options work around vendor requirements and may not survive future releases

Ventoy

  • The repository ships prebuilt binaries that are difficult to reproduce from source, so several Linux distributions refuse to package it and security teams in regulated organisations will usually reject it.
  • Development depends on one maintainer, so a period of inactivity leaves compatibility fixes for new distribution releases unaddressed with no second party able to cut a release.
  • Secure Boot works only after enrolling the Ventoy certificate through MokManager at the machine, which is a manual step at every device and is blocked outright on locked-down corporate firmware.
  • A small number of images still fail to boot in place and need workarounds, so a technician can discover mid-job that the one ISO they need is the one that does not work.
  • The data partition is exFAT by default, which means no file permissions and no journal, so a stick pulled during a copy can corrupt the whole image set rather than one file.

Pricing, plan by plan

Rufus

Free
  • RufusFree
    • Full functionality
    • No usage limits
    • Community support

Ventoy

Free
  • VentoyFree
    • Full feature set with no paid edition
    • GPLv3 licence
    • Windows and Linux installers

Which should you pick?

Choose Rufus if

  • You need bootable usb creation.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Windows.
  • You also want no installation.

Choose Ventoy if

  • You need in-place iso boot.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Windows, Linux.
  • You also want persistent overlays.

Questions people ask

Is Rufus or Ventoy better?
Neither clearly leads. Rufus starts at Free and Ventoy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Rufus or Ventoy?
Rufus starts at Free and Ventoy at Free.
Does Rufus or Ventoy run on more platforms?
Rufus runs on Windows. Ventoy runs on Windows, Linux.
Can I use Rufus for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Rufus best used for?
Rufus is most often used for writing a linux or windows installer to a usb stick, creating live usb media with a persistent partition, recovering a machine that will not boot from its internal drive. Of those, writing a linux or windows installer to a usb stick and creating live usb media with a persistent partition are not what Ventoy is typically brought in for.
What can Rufus do that Ventoy cannot?
Rufus covers Bootable USB creation, No installation, Partition scheme control, Windows install customisation. Ventoy covers In-place ISO boot, Persistent overlays, Plugin configuration, Secure Boot support.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Rufus: Is Rufus free?

Yes, open source under the GPL.

Ventoy: Can I still use the USB stick for ordinary file storage?

Yes. The data partition mounts as normal removable storage and files that are not bootable images are simply ignored by the menu.

Rufus: Does Rufus run on macOS or Linux?

No, it is Windows only. balenaEtcher is the usual cross-platform equivalent.

Ventoy: Do I need to reinstall Ventoy when a new distribution version comes out?

No. Delete the old ISO and copy the new one. You only rerun the installer to upgrade Ventoy itself.

Rufus: Why choose Rufus over the built-in tools?

It is faster than most alternatives and gives explicit control over partition scheme and target system, which matters when a machine will not boot from default media.

Ventoy: Is it safe to use in a company that audits open source?

Often not. The unreproducible prebuilt binaries in the repository are a genuine audit finding and have blocked approval at organisations with supply chain review.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads