File Storage · head to head
MinIO vs VAST Data

MinIO
File Storage
S3-compatible object storage server you run yourself, now under AGPL with a stripped community edition
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

VAST Data
File Storage
All-flash storage designed to make hard disk tiers unnecessary
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only MinIO has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: MinIO the AGPL v3 licence applies copyleft over network use, so embedding MinIO in a product or hosted service obliges you to release your own source or buy a commercial licence, and legal review has removed it from several vendor stacks for this reason alone.; VAST Data data reduction ratios drive the economics, and datasets that are already compressed, such as media or encrypted files, reduce poorly and destroy the cost per terabyte case.
- They diverge on capability: MinIO covers S3 API implementation, VAST Data covers Disaggregated architecture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which MinIO and VAST Data actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (File Storage).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in MinIO
- S3 API implementation
- Erasure coding
- Single binary deployment
- Bucket replication
- Object locking and versioning
- Identity provider integration
Only in VAST Data
- Disaggregated architecture
- Similarity-based reduction
- All-flash single tier
- Multi-protocol access
- Wide erasure coding
- GPU-oriented throughput
- Snapshots and replication
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
MinIO
- Providing an S3 endpoint inside an air gapped or regulated network where a cloud bucket is not permittednot VAST Data
- Backing a Kubernetes platform with object storage that lives on the same hardware as the clusternot VAST Data
- Standing up S3 semantics in CI so tests exercise the same API path as productionnot VAST Data
- Fronting local disk shelves with an S3 interface so applications only ever learn one storage APInot VAST Data
VAST Data
- A GPU training cluster where storage throughput, not compute, is the bottleneck on job completionnot MinIO
- A genomics group holding petabytes of sequencing output that must stay immediately readable rather than archived to tapenot MinIO
- A quantitative finance team running backtests over historical market data that a disk tier cannot serve fast enoughnot MinIO
- An organisation consolidating a fast tier and an archive tier into one system to reduce rack space and power drawnot MinIO
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
MinIO
- The AGPL v3 licence applies copyleft over network use, so embedding MinIO in a product or hosted service obliges you to release your own source or buy a commercial licence, and legal review has removed it from several vendor stacks for this reason alone.
- The community edition console was reduced in 2025 to an object browser, so user, policy, bucket and configuration management now happen through the mc command line client or through the paid product, which is a real operational regression for teams that trained staff on the UI.
- The vendor has changed the terms of the free edition twice, so planning long lived infrastructure around the community build carries the risk that the next change removes something you depend on.
- Erasure coded deployments cannot be grown by adding single drives; capacity is added in server pools, so expansion is a hardware purchase in units rather than an incremental one.
- Commercial pricing is capacity based and aimed at large deployments, so a team that outgrows the community edition faces an enterprise sized quote rather than a graduated upgrade path.
VAST Data
- Data reduction ratios drive the economics, and datasets that are already compressed, such as media or encrypted files, reduce poorly and destroy the cost per terabyte case.
- There is a minimum viable cluster size, so the entry cost is high and the platform is not sensible for a small footprint however attractive the architecture is.
- Pricing is quoted against effective capacity after reduction, which means the price you signed depends on an assumption about your own data that only becomes measurable after deployment.
- The platform has expanded into database and data catalogue functions, which broadens the roadmap but means buyers evaluating it as a file system must be careful not to be sold an adjacent product they will not use.
- As a relatively young vendor in a market of long-lived incumbents, buyers with ten year retention requirements should press on long term support commitments and hardware availability rather than assume them.
Pricing, plan by plan
MinIO
Free- Community (AGPL v3)Free
- Full server functionality
- Erasure coding and replication
- Object browser only in the web console
- AIStor$undefined/year
- Commercial licence removing AGPL obligations
- Full management console
- Vendor support with response commitments
VAST Data
On request- VAST Data Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per usable capacity after data reduction
- Hardware and software sold together or via certified partners
- Subscription and capital purchase options
Which should you pick?
Choose MinIO if
- You need s3 api implementation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Docker.
- You also want erasure coding.
Choose VAST Data if
- You need disaggregated architecture.
- You work on Linux.
- You also want similarity-based reduction.
Questions people ask
- Is MinIO or VAST Data better?
- Neither clearly leads. MinIO starts at Free and VAST Data at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, MinIO or VAST Data?
- MinIO has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for MinIO and On request for VAST Data.
- Does MinIO or VAST Data run on more platforms?
- MinIO runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes, Docker. VAST Data runs on Linux.
- Can I use MinIO for free?
- Yes. MinIO has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. VAST Data starts at On request.
- What is MinIO best used for?
- MinIO is most often used for providing an s3 endpoint inside an air gapped or regulated network where a cloud bucket is not permitted, backing a kubernetes platform with object storage that lives on the same hardware as the cluster, standing up s3 semantics in ci so tests exercise the same api path as production, fronting local disk shelves with an s3 interface so applications only ever learn one storage api. Of those, providing an s3 endpoint inside an air gapped or regulated network where a cloud bucket is not permitted and backing a kubernetes platform with object storage that lives on the same hardware as the cluster are not what VAST Data is typically brought in for.
- What can MinIO do that VAST Data cannot?
- MinIO covers S3 API implementation, Erasure coding, Single binary deployment, Bucket replication. VAST Data covers Disaggregated architecture, Similarity-based reduction, All-flash single tier, Multi-protocol access.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
MinIO: Can I still use MinIO for free?
Yes, the AGPL v3 server remains available and functional. What changed is the console, which no longer manages users, policies or configuration in the community build.
VAST Data: Do we still need an archive tier?
That is the central claim, and it holds when your data reduces well. Run a reduction assessment on your actual dataset before accepting the economics.
MinIO: Does AGPL affect me if I only use it internally?
Internal use without offering the software over a network to third parties generally does not trigger the source obligation, but if MinIO forms part of a service you offer to others, it does. Take advice rather than a forum answer.
VAST Data: How is capacity priced?
On usable capacity after data reduction, quoted rather than published. That makes the reduction ratio assumption the most important number in the contract.
MinIO: What replaced the community console features?
The mc client and the server admin API. Third party UIs exist but they are not maintained by MinIO.
VAST Data: Is it suitable for a small deployment?
No. There is a minimum cluster size and the entry cost reflects it. Small footprints are better served elsewhere.
MinIO: Is it suitable as a Veeam or restic backup target?
Yes, object locking and versioning work and both tools treat it as standard S3. Immutability depends on configuring the lock policy at bucket creation.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- MinIO vs Cloudian
- MinIO vs Scality RING
- MinIO vs Ceph
- MinIO vs Panzura
- MinIO vs Backblaze
- MinIO vs Cloudflare R2
- MinIO vs IDrive e2
- MinIO vs Storj
- MinIO vs Tigris
- MinIO vs TrueNAS
- MinIO vs Nextcloud
- MinIO vs Tresorit
- MinIO vs Veritas NetBackup
- MinIO vs Google Drive
- MinIO vs Nasuni
- MinIO vs pCloud
- MinIO vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- MinIO vs CrashPlan
- MinIO vs Microsoft OneDrive
- MinIO vs Box
- MinIO vs IDrive
- VAST Data vs Cloudian
- VAST Data vs Scality RING
- VAST Data vs Ceph
- VAST Data vs Panzura
- VAST Data vs Backblaze
- VAST Data vs Cloudflare R2
- VAST Data vs IDrive e2
- VAST Data vs Storj
- VAST Data vs Tigris
- VAST Data vs TrueNAS
- VAST Data vs Nextcloud
- VAST Data vs Tresorit
- VAST Data vs Veritas NetBackup
- VAST Data vs Google Drive
- VAST Data vs Nasuni
- VAST Data vs pCloud
- VAST Data vs Veeam Backup & Replication
- VAST Data vs CrashPlan
- VAST Data vs Microsoft OneDrive
- VAST Data vs Box
- VAST Data vs IDrive
