Cybersecurity · head to head
Tuta vs Unit21

Tuta
Cybersecurity
Secure, green and ad-free. Email to feel good about.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Unit21
Cybersecurity
No-code fraud and AML risk operations platform for fintechs and neobanks
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Tuta has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Tuta individual plan pricing only shown in EUR; no USD conversion provided on site; Unit21 it is built for fintech scale rather than card issuer scale, so organisations reaching very high transaction volumes generally re-evaluate against heavier platforms and face a migration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Tuta and Unit21 actually diverge.
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Tuta
Nothing recorded that Unit21 does not also cover.
Only in Unit21
- No-code rule builder
- Case management
- SAR filing
- Backtesting
- Identity and device signals
- Data ingestion API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Tuta
- Private encrypted email communicationnot Unit21
- Users valuing end-to-end encryption and zero-knowledge architecturenot Unit21
- Individuals seeking open-source email clientsnot Unit21
- Organizations requiring quantum-resistant encryptionnot Unit21
Unit21
- A neobank whose sponsor bank requires a documented monitoring programme before it will keep the BIN sponsorshipnot Tuta
- A crypto exchange needing SAR filing and case management without building an internal compliance engineering teamnot Tuta
- A payments startup where the fraud lead needs to ship a new rule the same day a new attack pattern appearsnot Tuta
- A lender consolidating fraud alerts from three point tools into one investigator queue with a single audit trailnot Tuta
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Tuta
- Individual plan pricing only shown in EUR; no USD conversion provided on site
- Family plan pricing separate (EUR 3 or EUR 8 per additional user) not included in main pricing
- Shared mailboxes require additional EUR 3-8 monthly charges
Unit21
- It is built for fintech scale rather than card issuer scale, so organisations reaching very high transaction volumes generally re-evaluate against heavier platforms and face a migration.
- No-code rule authoring shifts power to the risk team, which is the point, but without governance it produces rule sprawl that nobody can explain to an examiner two years later.
- Detection quality depends on the signals you feed it, so a thin integration produces thin results and the platform cannot compensate with proprietary consortium data the way larger vendors do.
- Pricing is quoted by volume with an annual commitment, so a fintech whose growth stalls pays for headroom it did not use.
- SAR filing coverage is oriented to United States FinCEN reporting, so firms filing in the United Kingdom, European Union or Asia handle those submissions outside the tool.
Pricing, plan by plan
Tuta
Free- Free PlanFree
- 1 GB storage
- 1 calendar
- 3 labels
- Revolutionary Plan$3/month
- 20 GB storage
- 15 email aliases
- 3 custom domains
- Legend Plan$8/month
- 500 GB storage
- 30 email aliases
- 10 custom domains
Unit21
On request- Unit21 Platform$undefined/year
- Priced by monitored volume and modules, annual contract
- Fraud, AML and case management packaged separately
- Implementation and historical data backfill quoted with the subscription
Which should you pick?
Questions people ask
- Is Tuta or Unit21 better?
- Neither clearly leads. Tuta starts at Free and Unit21 at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Tuta or Unit21?
- Tuta has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Tuta and On request for Unit21.
- Does Tuta or Unit21 run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Tuta for free?
- Yes. Tuta has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Unit21 starts at On request.
- What is Tuta best used for?
- Tuta is most often used for private encrypted email communication, users valuing end-to-end encryption and zero-knowledge architecture, individuals seeking open-source email clients, organizations requiring quantum-resistant encryption. Of those, private encrypted email communication and users valuing end-to-end encryption and zero-knowledge architecture are not what Unit21 is typically brought in for.
- What can Tuta do that Unit21 cannot?
- Unit21 covers No-code rule builder, Case management, SAR filing, Backtesting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Tuta: How much does Tuta email cost?
Tuta offers a free plan with 1 GB storage. Paid plans are EUR 3/month (Revolutionary) with 20 GB storage and 15 email aliases, and EUR 8/month (Legend) with 500 GB storage and 30 email aliases. Family plan add-ons cost EUR 3-8 per additional mailbox member monthly.
SourceUnit21: Do we need engineers to run it?
Only for the initial data integration. After that the design intent is that risk and compliance staff author and deploy rules themselves.
Tuta: Is there a free email plan with Tuta?
Yes, Tuta's free plan includes 1 GB of storage, one calendar, three labels, and full end-to-end encryption security features with no custom domains or email aliases.
SourceUnit21: Does it file SARs?
Yes, it generates and electronically files suspicious activity reports to FinCEN. Non-US regimes are not covered to the same depth.
Tuta: What are the limits on Tuta's free email plan?
The free plan provides 1 GB storage, access to one calendar, three labels maximum, and no support for custom domains or additional email aliases.
SourceUnit21: Can we test a rule before it goes live?
Yes. Backtesting against historical data to see projected alert volume is one of the more useful parts of the product, because alert volume is the real cost.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Tuta vs Proton Mail
- Tuta vs Brave Browser
- Tuta vs OneTrust
- Tuta vs Very Good Security
- Tuta vs 1Password
- Tuta vs Norton 360
- Tuta vs LastPass
- Tuta vs HashiCorp Vault
- Tuta vs Cisco Duo
- Tuta vs IDnow
- Tuta vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Tuta vs Mullvad VPN
- Tuta vs Ory Kratos
- Tuta vs OWASP ZAP
- Tuta vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Tuta vs Passbolt
- Tuta vs Ping Identity
- Tuta vs Proofpoint
- Tuta vs Feedzai
- Tuta vs ThetaRay
- Tuta vs Sardine
- Tuta vs NICE Actimize
- Tuta vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Tuta vs Socure
- Tuta vs Quantexa
- Tuta vs Fenergo
- Tuta vs Transmit Security
- Tuta vs Jumio
- Tuta vs Silent Eight
- Tuta vs Sumsub
- Tuta vs LogicManager
- Tuta vs Private Internet Access
- Unit21 vs Proton Mail
- Unit21 vs Brave Browser
- Unit21 vs OneTrust
- Unit21 vs Very Good Security
- Unit21 vs 1Password
- Unit21 vs Norton 360
- Unit21 vs LastPass
- Unit21 vs HashiCorp Vault
- Unit21 vs Cisco Duo
- Unit21 vs IDnow
- Unit21 vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Unit21 vs Mullvad VPN
- Unit21 vs Ory Kratos
- Unit21 vs OWASP ZAP
- Unit21 vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Unit21 vs Passbolt
- Unit21 vs Ping Identity
- Unit21 vs Proofpoint
- Unit21 vs Feedzai
- Unit21 vs ThetaRay
- Unit21 vs Sardine
- Unit21 vs NICE Actimize
- Unit21 vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Unit21 vs Socure
- Unit21 vs Quantexa
- Unit21 vs Fenergo
- Unit21 vs Transmit Security
- Unit21 vs Jumio
- Unit21 vs Silent Eight
- Unit21 vs Sumsub
- Unit21 vs LogicManager
- Unit21 vs Private Internet Access
