Softwr

Cybersecurity · head to head

Syft vs Turborepo

Syft logo

Syft

Cybersecurity

Generates a software bill of materials from images, filesystems and archives

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Full reviewWebsite
Turborepo logo

Turborepo

Developer Tools

High-performance build system for JavaScript and TypeScript monorepos

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Syft lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.; Turborepo no commercial support mentioned
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Syft and Turborepo actually diverge.

Attributes where Syft and Turborepo differ
AttributeSyftTurborepo
Pricing modelOpen source, no licence feeopen-source
PlatformsmacOS, Linux, Windows, DockerJavaScript/TypeScript, npm, yarn, pnpm
CategoryCybersecurityDeveloper Tools
FoundedUnknown2015

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Syft

  • Multi-format output
  • Broad ecosystem coverage
  • Binary classifiers
  • In-toto attestations
  • Library and CLI
  • Pairs with Grype

Only in Turborepo

Nothing recorded that Syft does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Syft

  • Producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires onenot Turborepo
  • Feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directlynot Turborepo
  • Recording what shipped in a build so a future disclosure can be answered quicklynot Turborepo
  • Public sector work where an SBOM is a contractual deliverablenot Turborepo

Turborepo

  • Monorepo build orchestrationnot Syft
  • JavaScript/TypeScript build optimizationnot Syft
  • Incremental buildsnot Syft
  • Task caching and remote executionnot Syft

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Syft

  • Lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
  • Fidelity varies sharply by ecosystem. Conan for C and C++, Haskell and Terraform get cataloguer support with no licence data, no dependency relationships and no file ownership, so a C and C++ shop gets the least from it.
  • Binary classification yields no licence or dependency metadata, and vendored or statically linked code is exactly where supply chain risk hides, so the blind spot and the risk overlap.
  • Incorrect CPE values and CPE collisions are recorded as open issues, and since Grype matches on CPE and PURL, an inventory error becomes a false negative in the security report downstream.
  • An inventory is not a risk assessment. Even a perfect bill of materials says a vulnerable version is present, never that the vulnerable function is called, and the triage burden lands entirely on the reader.

Turborepo

  • No commercial support mentioned
  • Build tool with community-driven development

Pricing, plan by plan

Syft

Free
  • SyftFree
    • Apache-2.0
    • No usage limits
    • Community support
  • Anchore Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Policy enforcement and reporting
    • Federal and commercial tiers
    • Pricing not published, quoted on request

Turborepo

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Turborepo review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Syft if

  • You need multi-format output.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
  • You also want broad ecosystem coverage.
Syft review

Choose Turborepo if

  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on JavaScript/TypeScript, npm, yarn, pnpm.
Turborepo review

Questions people ask

Is Syft or Turborepo better?
Neither clearly leads. Syft starts at Free and Turborepo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Syft or Turborepo?
Syft starts at Free and Turborepo at Free.
Does Syft or Turborepo run on more platforms?
Syft runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker. Turborepo runs on JavaScript/TypeScript, npm, yarn, pnpm.
Can I use Syft for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Syft best used for?
Syft is most often used for producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires one, feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directly, recording what shipped in a build so a future disclosure can be answered quickly, public sector work where an sbom is a contractual deliverable. Of those, producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires one and feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directly are not what Turborepo is typically brought in for.
What can Syft do that Turborepo cannot?
Syft covers Multi-format output, Broad ecosystem coverage, Binary classifiers, In-toto attestations.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Syft: Does Syft find vulnerabilities?

No. It produces an inventory. Grype, from the same company, matches that inventory against vulnerability feeds. They are separate tools and the distinction is frequently lost.

Turborepo: Is Turborepo free?

Yes. Turborepo is open-source and free to use. The project is maintained and documented on turborepo.dev (redirected from turbo.build).

Source
Syft: Does anything in the Anchore stack do reachability analysis?

No. Neither Syft, Grype nor the commercial Anchore platform performs call graph or reachability analysis, so none of them tells you whether a vulnerable code path is actually invoked.

Turborepo: Does Turborepo offer commercial support or enterprise tiers?

No pricing tiers or commercial support details are provided on the Turborepo documentation site. The project appears to be community-supported.

Source
Syft: Is it a CNCF or OpenSSF project?

No. It is single-vendor open source owned by Anchore, with no foundation governance. That is a different licence risk profile from Sigstore.

Syft: What does Anchore Enterprise cost?

Not published. The pricing page is contact-sales only, with named but unpriced commercial and federal tiers.

Syft: How do I know my SBOM is complete?

You largely cannot, which is the honest answer. Silent partial parsing is a known open defect, so a bill of materials used for compliance should be spot-checked against a known dependency list.

Share

Related pages

More on Syft

More on Turborepo

Keep looking

Other head to heads