Softwr

Machine Learning · head to head

Apache Spark MLlib vs Weaviate

Apache Spark MLlib logo

Apache Spark MLlib

Machine Learning

The machine learning library inside Apache Spark, for data that will not fit on one machine

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Weaviate logo

Weaviate

Machine Learning

Open-source vector database

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Apache Spark MLlib the algorithm set has grown slowly and its gradient boosting does not match XGBoost or LightGBM in accuracy or speed, so teams routinely do feature engineering in Spark and then train elsewhere, which undoes the argument for using it at all.; Weaviate the free tier caps at 100,000 objects, 1 GB of memory and a single collection
  • They diverge on capability: Apache Spark MLlib covers DataFrame-based pipelines, Weaviate covers Vector and keyword search.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Apache Spark MLlib and Weaviate actually diverge.

Attributes where Apache Spark MLlib and Weaviate differ
AttributeApache Spark MLlibWeaviate
Pricing modelopen-sourcefreemium
PlatformsLinux, macOS, WindowsLinux, Mac, Windows, Web
Founded19992019

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Machine Learning).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Apache Spark MLlib

  • DataFrame-based pipelines
  • Distributed algorithms
  • Alternating least squares
  • Feature transformers
  • Model selection
  • Pipeline persistence
  • Language bindings
  • Runs in existing Spark deployments

Only in Weaviate

  • Vector and keyword search
  • Built-in vectorizers
  • GraphQL API
  • Multi-tenancy
  • Hybrid search
  • OpenAI
  • Hugging Face
  • Cohere

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Apache Spark MLlib

  • Training on a data set too large to hold on one machine, where sampling down would lose the rare events you care aboutnot Weaviate
  • Feature engineering and model fitting in one job over tables already in the lake, avoiding an extract and a second copy of sensitive datanot Weaviate
  • Batch scoring of hundreds of millions of rows on a schedule, where throughput matters and per-request latency does notnot Weaviate
  • Organisations that already run and pay for Spark, where adding a modelling step is cheaper than introducing a second platformnot Weaviate

Weaviate

  • Running a vector database for semantic and hybrid searchnot Apache Spark MLlib
  • Generating and storing embeddings alongside the objects they describenot Apache Spark MLlib

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Apache Spark MLlib

  • The algorithm set has grown slowly and its gradient boosting does not match XGBoost or LightGBM in accuracy or speed, so teams routinely do feature engineering in Spark and then train elsewhere, which undoes the argument for using it at all.
  • There is no deep learning in MLlib; neural network work on Spark requires a separate integration, and the DataFrame-centred interface is an awkward fit for it.
  • Fitted models serialise into Spark's own format, so low-latency serving needs either a Spark session in the request path, which is far too slow, or a conversion through ONNX or MLeap, and this is where most Spark ML projects stall.
  • Debugging is JVM cluster debugging: executor out-of-memory, shuffle spill, skewed partitions and serialisation failures, so an engineer without Spark operations experience spends more time tuning the cluster than improving the model.
  • The cluster is the real cost and Spark holds executors for the duration of a job, so a badly partitioned training run pays for idle cores across the whole fleet while one straggler task finishes.

Weaviate

  • The free tier caps at 100,000 objects, 1 GB of memory and a single collection
  • Billing is per million vector dimensions rather than per record, so wider embeddings cost proportionally more for the same object count
  • Premium is a prepaid contract starting at $400 a month rather than pay as you go
  • Storage rates do not fall consistently with tier, and Premium Dedicated is $0.1505 per GiB against $0.12 on the cheaper Flex plan
  • The Query Agent is metered separately, free to 1,000 requests a month and $30 a month plus overage beyond

Pricing, plan by plan

Apache Spark MLlib

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Apache Spark MLlib review.

Weaviate

Free
  • Open SourceFree
    • Full features
    • Self-hosted
  • ServerlessFree
    • Managed service
    • Auto-scaling

Which should you pick?

Choose Apache Spark MLlib if

  • You need dataframe-based pipelines.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
  • You also want distributed algorithms.
Apache Spark MLlib review

Choose Weaviate if

  • You need vector and keyword search.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, Mac, Windows, Web.
  • You also want built-in vectorizers.
Weaviate review

Questions people ask

Is Apache Spark MLlib or Weaviate better?
Neither clearly leads. Apache Spark MLlib starts at Free and Weaviate at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Apache Spark MLlib or Weaviate?
Apache Spark MLlib starts at Free and Weaviate at Free.
Does Apache Spark MLlib or Weaviate run on more platforms?
Apache Spark MLlib runs on Linux, macOS, Windows. Weaviate runs on Linux, Mac, Windows, Web.
Can I use Apache Spark MLlib for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Apache Spark MLlib best used for?
Apache Spark MLlib is most often used for training on a data set too large to hold on one machine, where sampling down would lose the rare events you care about, feature engineering and model fitting in one job over tables already in the lake, avoiding an extract and a second copy of sensitive data, batch scoring of hundreds of millions of rows on a schedule, where throughput matters and per-request latency does not, organisations that already run and pay for spark, where adding a modelling step is cheaper than introducing a second platform. Of those, training on a data set too large to hold on one machine, where sampling down would lose the rare events you care about and feature engineering and model fitting in one job over tables already in the lake, avoiding an extract and a second copy of sensitive data are not what Weaviate is typically brought in for.
What can Apache Spark MLlib do that Weaviate cannot?
Apache Spark MLlib covers DataFrame-based pipelines, Distributed algorithms, Alternating least squares, Feature transformers. Weaviate covers Vector and keyword search, Built-in vectorizers, GraphQL API, Multi-tenancy.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Apache Spark MLlib: What is the difference between spark.ml and spark.mllib?

spark.ml is the DataFrame-based interface and the one to use. spark.mllib is the older RDD-based package, kept for compatibility, in maintenance and receiving no new features.

Weaviate: What pricing options does Weaviate offer?

Weaviate provides a free tier with usage-based pricing, plus enterprise options. Visit the pricing page for detailed information on plans.

Source
Apache Spark MLlib: Do I need a cluster?

Spark runs in local mode on one machine, which is useful for development, but if you are running on one machine you would generally be better served by scikit-learn or XGBoost, which are faster and more capable at that scale.

Weaviate: Does Weaviate offer customer support?

Yes, support is included with Weaviate's cloud offerings. Enterprise customers receive first-class support from their global team of experts.

Source
Apache Spark MLlib: Can I use scikit-learn on Spark instead?

Yes, and it is often the better answer. You can distribute independent model fits across the cluster, or use pandas user-defined functions to run per-group models, keeping Spark for the data and a mature library for the modelling.

Weaviate: Can I deploy Weaviate on my own infrastructure?

Yes. Weaviate is open source and deployment-agnostic. You can run it in your own cloud environment or use their managed cloud service.

Source
Apache Spark MLlib: How do I serve an MLlib model in real time?

Not directly. Either convert the pipeline to a portable format such as ONNX or MLeap, or reimplement the scoring path. Starting a Spark session per request adds seconds of overhead and is not a serving strategy.

Weaviate: What data security features does Weaviate provide?

Weaviate includes security & governance, RBAC, SOC 2 and HIPAA compliance, along with multi-tenancy and high availability for enterprise requirements.

Source
Apache Spark MLlib: Is it free?

The library is Apache 2.0 and costs nothing. The cluster it runs on is billed by your cloud provider or by Databricks, and that is the actual expense.

Weaviate: How do I get started with Weaviate?

Sign up for their cloud tier, create your first dataset, connect an LLM, and build your AI app. Documentation and quickstart guides are available for Python, Go, TypeScript, and JavaScript.

Source
Share

Related pages

More on Apache Spark MLlib

More on Weaviate

Keep looking

Other head to heads