Developer Tools · head to head
Spacelift vs Wasabi

Spacelift
Developer Tools
Infrastructure-as-code orchestration for Terraform, OpenTofu, Pulumi and Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Spacelift has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Spacelift users are unlimited and private workers are metered, so deployment concurrency rather than headcount drives the bill, which inverts how most engineering budgets are built and is easy to under-forecast.; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: Spacelift covers Multi-tool orchestration, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Spacelift and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Spacelift
- Multi-tool orchestration
- Policy as code
- Private workers
- Spaces
- Blueprints
- Drift detection
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Spacelift
- Platform teams running infrastructure changes through approval gates rather than through application CInot Wasabi
- Organisations standardising Terraform and OpenTofu across many teams with policy enforcementnot Wasabi
- Estates needing private runners so cloud credentials never leave the networknot Wasabi
- Teams wanting drift detection and reconciliation rather than plan-time checks alonenot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Spacelift
- Media storagenot Spacelift
- Archive replacementnot Spacelift
- Ransomware protectionnot Spacelift
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Spacelift
- Users are unlimited and private workers are metered, so deployment concurrency rather than headcount drives the bill, which inverts how most engineering budgets are built and is easy to under-forecast.
- There is no affordable paid entry point. The free tier stops at two users and the next tier is a five-figure commitment with nothing in between.
- Three of the five tiers are quote-only, so a shortlist cannot be costed without entering a sales process with each vendor on it.
- The self-hosted build lags the hosted one, has no public worker pool and lacks the Azure and Google Cloud integrations available in the SaaS product, with OIDC federation offered as the workaround.
- Stacks, Rego policies, Blueprints, Spaces and Spacelift-managed state are proprietary constructs, so leaving means rebuilding the orchestration layer rather than pointing it at a different runner.
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
Spacelift
Free- FreeFree
- Two users
- Public workers only
- No private workers
- Starter Plus$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Two public workers
- One to two private workers
- Business$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Three private workers
- Quoted
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Five to thirty private workers
- Self-hosted option
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Spacelift if
- You need multi-tool orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, Cloud.
- You also want policy as code.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Spacelift or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Spacelift starts at Free and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Spacelift or Wasabi?
- Spacelift has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Spacelift and $7.99/month for Wasabi.
- Does Spacelift or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- Spacelift runs on Web, Self-hosted, Cloud. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Spacelift for free?
- Yes. Spacelift has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Wasabi starts at $7.99/month.
- What is Spacelift best used for?
- Spacelift is most often used for platform teams running infrastructure changes through approval gates rather than through application ci, organisations standardising terraform and opentofu across many teams with policy enforcement, estates needing private runners so cloud credentials never leave the network, teams wanting drift detection and reconciliation rather than plan-time checks alone. Of those, platform teams running infrastructure changes through approval gates rather than through application ci and organisations standardising terraform and opentofu across many teams with policy enforcement are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can Spacelift do that Wasabi cannot?
- Spacelift covers Multi-tool orchestration, Policy as code, Private workers, Spaces. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Spacelift: How is Spacelift priced?
By tier and by private worker count rather than per user. Users are unlimited on every paid plan. The published figure on the pricing page carries no period label, and the FAQ describes the tier as an annual subscription, so confirm the period in writing.
Wasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceSpacelift: Does it support OpenTofu?
Yes, and Spacelift sponsors the OpenTofu project, which is a substantive hedge for anyone avoiding Terraform under the Business Source Licence.
Wasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceSpacelift: Is there a self-hosted version?
Yes, described as carrying Enterprise functionality, but it is priced on request and lags the hosted product on cloud integrations.
Wasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceSpacelift: Why not just use the CI system we already have?
That is the real comparison. General purpose CI handles state, drift, approval gates and concurrency control for infrastructure poorly, and whether that is worth a five-figure floor depends on how much infrastructure change your organisation actually ships.
Wasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Spacelift: What happens to our pipelines if we leave?
They do not port. Rego policies, Blueprints, Spaces and managed state are Spacelift constructs and the orchestration has to be rebuilt elsewhere.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Spacelift vs Atlantis
- Spacelift vs Earthly
- Spacelift vs Harness
- Spacelift vs Cortex
- Spacelift vs OpsLevel
- Spacelift vs Backstage
- Spacelift vs Okteto
- Spacelift vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Spacelift vs HCP Terraform
- Spacelift vs Azure DevOps
- Spacelift vs ConfigCat
- Spacelift vs Frappe
- Spacelift vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Spacelift vs Cody
- Spacelift vs Dagger
- Spacelift vs Deep Code
- Spacelift vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Spacelift vs DigitalOcean
- Spacelift vs Hetzner Cloud
- Spacelift vs Scaleway
- Spacelift vs Linode
- Spacelift vs Vultr
- Spacelift vs Zeabur
- Spacelift vs Porter
- Spacelift vs Contabo
- Spacelift vs Encore
- Spacelift vs Google Cloud Platform
- Spacelift vs Microsoft Azure
- Spacelift vs HAProxy
- Spacelift vs IBM Cloud
- Spacelift vs kind
- Spacelift vs Koyeb
- Spacelift vs Kustomize
- Spacelift vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs Atlantis
- Wasabi vs Earthly
- Wasabi vs Harness
- Wasabi vs Cortex
- Wasabi vs OpsLevel
- Wasabi vs Backstage
- Wasabi vs Okteto
- Wasabi vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Wasabi vs HCP Terraform
- Wasabi vs Azure DevOps
- Wasabi vs ConfigCat
- Wasabi vs Frappe
- Wasabi vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Wasabi vs Cody
- Wasabi vs Dagger
- Wasabi vs Deep Code
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd

