Developer Tools · head to head
Sourcegraph vs Stytch

Sourcegraph
Developer Tools
Code search and intelligence platform for large codebases with Cody AI assistant
- From
- $16000/year
- Free plan
- No

Stytch
Cybersecurity
Identity platform with passwordless auth, passkeys and bot detection.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Stytch has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Sourcegraph enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams; Stytch free tier limited to 10,000 monthly active users; scaling beyond this requires custom pricing negotiation
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sourcegraph and Stytch actually diverge.
| Attribute | Sourcegraph | Stytch |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $16000/year | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Cloud, Self-hosted | Web, API |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sourcegraph
- Large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositoriesnot Stytch
- Enterprise governance and code ownership trackingnot Stytch
- AI-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detectionnot Stytch
- Onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebasesnot Stytch
- Regulatory compliance and code audit trailsnot Stytch
Stytch
- Applications prioritising passwordless and passkey authenticationnot Sourcegraph
- SaaS platforms requiring AI agent authentication and machine-to-machine flowsnot Sourcegraph
- Companies with emerging identity needs such as bot detection and device intelligencenot Sourcegraph
- Organisations building with Next.js and React requiring modern auth patternsnot Sourcegraph
- Applications needing transparent pricing without surprise tiers or feature gatingnot Sourcegraph
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sourcegraph
- Enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
- No free tier or standard plan published; all options require custom sales engagement
- Complex enterprise-only positioning limits adoption compared to GitHub Copilot's pervasiveness
- Requires indexing entire codebase; not suitable for small or ephemeral projects
Stytch
- Free tier limited to 10,000 monthly active users; scaling beyond this requires custom pricing negotiation
- Fraud prevention capabilities billed at $0.005 per fingerprint for usage exceeding 10,000 free checks
- Additional SSO or SCIM connections beyond the 5 included in free tier cost $125 each
- Brand customisation and email removal require one-time payment of $99
- HIPAA and advanced fraud protection only available in Enterprise tier
- No native UI builder; requires custom frontend development for fully-branded auth flows
Pricing, plan by plan
Sourcegraph
$16000/year- Enterprise$16000/year
- Scales with team size
- Credits for AI features per user
- Deep Search
Stytch
Free- FreeFree
- 10,000 monthly active users and AI agents
- Unlimited organisations
- 5 SSO or SCIM connections
- Scaled$undefined/variable
- Usage-based pricing for users exceeding 10,000
- All free tier features
- Volume discounts available
- Enterprise$undefined/variable
- Custom pricing
- Discounted volume rates
- Enterprise support SLA
Which should you pick?
Questions people ask
- Is Sourcegraph or Stytch better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year and Stytch at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sourcegraph or Stytch?
- Stytch has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $16000/year for Sourcegraph and Free for Stytch.
- Does Sourcegraph or Stytch run on more platforms?
- Sourcegraph runs on Cloud, Self-hosted. Stytch runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Stytch for free?
- Yes. Stytch has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year.
- What is Sourcegraph best used for?
- Sourcegraph is most often used for large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositories, enterprise governance and code ownership tracking, ai-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detection, onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebases. Of those, large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositories and enterprise governance and code ownership tracking are not what Stytch is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Stytch: What is included in Stytch's free tier?
The free tier includes 10,000 monthly active users (human and AI agents), unlimited organisations, 5 SSO or SCIM connections, and 1,000 machine-to-machine tokens with full authentication features.
SourceStytch: Does Stytch support AI agent authentication?
Yes. Stytch provides native AI agent authentication and authorisation, with support for the Model Context Protocol (MCP) for authenticating AI agents accessing external systems.
SourceStytch: What fraud prevention features does Stytch offer?
Stytch includes bot detection with 99.99% accuracy, device fingerprinting, invisible CAPTCHA, and zero-day device intelligence built into all tiers.
SourceRelated pages
More on Sourcegraph
Other head to heads
- Sourcegraph vs Visual Studio Code
- Sourcegraph vs ESLint
- Sourcegraph vs pnpm
- Sourcegraph vs Turborepo
- Sourcegraph vs Cody
- Sourcegraph vs Sweep
- Sourcegraph vs Bazel
- Sourcegraph vs GitHub Copilot
- Sourcegraph vs Moonrepo
- Sourcegraph vs Nixpacks
- Sourcegraph vs Pieces for Developers
- Sourcegraph vs Rust
- Sourcegraph vs Fig
- Sourcegraph vs Frappe
- Sourcegraph vs Git
- Sourcegraph vs GoLand
- Sourcegraph vs Hookdeck
- Sourcegraph vs JFrog Artifactory
- Sourcegraph vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Sourcegraph vs 1Password
- Sourcegraph vs Norton 360
- Sourcegraph vs LastPass
- Sourcegraph vs Cisco Duo
- Sourcegraph vs Transmit Security
- Sourcegraph vs Descope
- Sourcegraph vs Authy
- Sourcegraph vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Sourcegraph vs VMware Carbon Black
- Sourcegraph vs Feedzai
- Sourcegraph vs NICE Actimize
- Sourcegraph vs Salient CompleteView
- Sourcegraph vs Sumsub
- Sourcegraph vs Tuta
- Sourcegraph vs Camio
- Sourcegraph vs Clerk
- Stytch vs Visual Studio Code
- Stytch vs ESLint
- Stytch vs pnpm
- Stytch vs Turborepo
- Stytch vs Cody
- Stytch vs Sweep
- Stytch vs Bazel
- Stytch vs GitHub Copilot
- Stytch vs Moonrepo
- Stytch vs Nixpacks
- Stytch vs Pieces for Developers
- Stytch vs Rust
- Stytch vs Fig
- Stytch vs Frappe
- Stytch vs Git
- Stytch vs GoLand
- Stytch vs Hookdeck
- Stytch vs JFrog Artifactory
- Stytch vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Stytch vs 1Password
- Stytch vs Norton 360
- Stytch vs LastPass
- Stytch vs Cisco Duo
- Stytch vs Transmit Security
- Stytch vs Descope
- Stytch vs Authy
- Stytch vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Stytch vs VMware Carbon Black
- Stytch vs Feedzai
- Stytch vs NICE Actimize
- Stytch vs Salient CompleteView
- Stytch vs Sumsub
- Stytch vs Tuta
- Stytch vs Camio
- Stytch vs Clerk
