APIs · head to head
Skyflow vs Stainless

Skyflow
APIs
Data privacy vault that holds sensitive records outside your own systems
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Stainless
APIs
Generates client SDKs, API docs, and MCP servers from an OpenAPI spec
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Stainless has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Skyflow reported contracts near 195,000 US dollars a year with a platform fee before usage put this out of reach of early stage companies, which are precisely the ones whose architecture is still cheap to change.; Stainless starter and Pro plan prices are not published and require contacting the company.
- They diverge on capability: Skyflow covers Tokenised storage, Stainless covers SDK generation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Skyflow and Stainless actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Skyflow
- Tokenised storage
- Polymorphic encryption
- Field level access policies
- Data residency
- Secure functions
- PCI scope reduction
- Detokenisation gateway
- Audit trail
Only in Stainless
- SDK generation
- MCP server generation
- Docs site generation
- Webhooks and streaming support
- Automated unit tests
- Git integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Skyflow
- A fintech that wants card and bank account data out of its own infrastructure so its application servers leave PCI DSS assessment scopenot Stainless
- A company entering India or the EU with data localisation obligations that would otherwise require standing up regional databases and operationsnot Stainless
- A health technology business that needs protected health information isolated from the analytics stack while still supporting aggregate reportingnot Stainless
- An engineering team that wants support agents to see masked identifiers and payment services to see real ones, enforced centrally rather than in every servicenot Stainless
Stainless
- Generating typed SDKs for a public APInot Skyflow
- Producing an MCP server from an existing OpenAPI specnot Skyflow
- Building an API documentation site alongside client librariesnot Skyflow
- Giving open-source APIs a free SDK generation pathnot Skyflow
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Skyflow
- Reported contracts near 195,000 US dollars a year with a platform fee before usage put this out of reach of early stage companies, which are precisely the ones whose architecture is still cheap to change.
- Every read of a protected field becomes a network call to a third party, so latency and an external availability dependency enter paths that were previously local database reads, and outage planning has to account for a vendor you do not control.
- Analytics and joins on vaulted data are constrained; work that was a simple SQL join now happens through secure functions or on tokens, and data teams routinely discover this after the engineering team has committed.
- Unwinding the vault later is a rewrite rather than a migration because tokens are threaded through every service, so the switching cost climbs steadily and the negotiating position at renewal weakens with each release.
- Scope reduction is an architectural claim your own assessor must accept, so the audit saving is real only if the implementation genuinely keeps sensitive values off your systems, and partial implementations that leave a cache or a log line in place deliver the cost without the benefit.
Stainless
- Starter and Pro plan prices are not published and require contacting the company.
- The free plan caps APIs at 25 endpoints, which excludes larger production APIs.
- Overage charges apply per SDK/endpoint/month once limits are exceeded, which can make costs unpredictable at scale.
Pricing, plan by plan
Skyflow
On request- Skyflow Data Privacy Vault$undefined/year
- Platform fee plus usage by data subject count
- Priced additionally per data residency region
- PCI Level 1, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 and HIPAA coverage
Stainless
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 generators (SDKs, docs, or MCP servers)
- 5 seats
- APIs with 25 or fewer endpoints
- Starter$undefined/mo
- Unlimited generators
- Expanded seats
- Private SDKs of any size
- Pro$undefined/mo
- Custom enterprise features and pricing
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Dedicated support
- SOC 2 compliance reports
- Purchase order/invoicing with negotiable terms
Which should you pick?
Choose Skyflow if
- You need tokenised storage.
- You work on API, Web, Self-hosted.
- You also want polymorphic encryption.
Choose Stainless if
- You need sdk generation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want mcp server generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Skyflow or Stainless better?
- Neither clearly leads. Skyflow starts at On request and Stainless at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Skyflow or Stainless?
- Stainless has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Skyflow and Free for Stainless.
- Does Skyflow or Stainless run on more platforms?
- Skyflow runs on API, Web, Self-hosted. Stainless runs on web, api.
- Can I use Stainless for free?
- Yes. Stainless has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Skyflow starts at On request.
- What is Skyflow best used for?
- Skyflow is most often used for a fintech that wants card and bank account data out of its own infrastructure so its application servers leave pci dss assessment scope, a company entering india or the eu with data localisation obligations that would otherwise require standing up regional databases and operations, a health technology business that needs protected health information isolated from the analytics stack while still supporting aggregate reporting, an engineering team that wants support agents to see masked identifiers and payment services to see real ones, enforced centrally rather than in every service. Of those, a fintech that wants card and bank account data out of its own infrastructure so its application servers leave pci dss assessment scope and a company entering india or the eu with data localisation obligations that would otherwise require standing up regional databases and operations are not what Stainless is typically brought in for.
- What can Skyflow do that Stainless cannot?
- Skyflow covers Tokenised storage, Polymorphic encryption, Field level access policies, Data residency. Stainless covers SDK generation, MCP server generation, Docs site generation, Webhooks and streaming support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Skyflow: Does Skyflow really take my systems out of PCI scope?
It can, if card data never touches your infrastructure and the detokenisation happens at the boundary. Your QSA has to agree the design, so validate the architecture with your assessor before signing.
Stainless: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
Yes. The Free plan supports up to 5 generators, 5 seats, APIs with 25 or fewer endpoints, and 100 preview builds per month, with email support.
SourceSkyflow: What does it cost?
Nothing is published. Reported annual contracts sit around 195,000 US dollars, built from a platform fee plus usage by data subject count and additional charges per data residency region.
Stainless: Who owns the generated SDK code?
The generated SDK code is owned by the customer and published by Stainless under the Apache 2.0 license.
SourceSkyflow: How does it help with data localisation?
Records can be pinned to a specified region, so an Indian or EU residency requirement is met by the vault rather than by you running regional databases and operations teams.
Stainless: What happens if I exceed my plan's endpoint limit?
Customers exceeding their endpoint limits are billed per SDK, per endpoint, per month for the overage.
SourceSkyflow: Can I still run analytics on vaulted data?
Partly. Aggregates and comparisons are supported through polymorphic encryption and secure functions, but arbitrary joins against other datasets are harder than they were, and this is the most common late surprise.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Skyflow vs Basis Theory
- Skyflow vs Paymentology
- Skyflow vs Akoya
- Skyflow vs Skaleet
- Skyflow vs Volt
- Skyflow vs Tink
- Skyflow vs Increase
- Skyflow vs Yodlee
- Skyflow vs Griffin
- Skyflow vs Trustly
- Skyflow vs Method Financial
- Skyflow vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Skyflow vs LiteLLM
- Skyflow vs Neonomics
- Skyflow vs Payload CMS
- Skyflow vs Portkey
- Skyflow vs Swagger
- Skyflow vs Prisma
- Skyflow vs Asyncapi
- Skyflow vs REST Client VSCode
- Skyflow vs Appwrite
- Skyflow vs TrueLayer
- Skyflow vs Stoplight
- Skyflow vs Treasury Prime
- Skyflow vs Paw
- Skyflow vs RapidAPI
- Skyflow vs Rutter
- Skyflow vs Sensedia
- Skyflow vs Sila
- Skyflow vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Stainless vs Basis Theory
- Stainless vs Paymentology
- Stainless vs Akoya
- Stainless vs Skaleet
- Stainless vs Volt
- Stainless vs Tink
- Stainless vs Increase
- Stainless vs Yodlee
- Stainless vs Griffin
- Stainless vs Trustly
- Stainless vs Method Financial
- Stainless vs MuleSoft Anypoint
- Stainless vs LiteLLM
- Stainless vs Neonomics
- Stainless vs Payload CMS
- Stainless vs Portkey
- Stainless vs Swagger
- Stainless vs Prisma
- Stainless vs Asyncapi
- Stainless vs REST Client VSCode
- Stainless vs Appwrite
- Stainless vs TrueLayer
- Stainless vs Stoplight
- Stainless vs Treasury Prime
- Stainless vs Paw
- Stainless vs RapidAPI
- Stainless vs Rutter
- Stainless vs Sensedia
- Stainless vs Sila
- Stainless vs Swagger/OpenAPI
