Softwr

Technology · head to head

Site24x7 vs Steampipe

Site24x7 logo

Site24x7

Technology

All-in-one monitoring for DevOps and IT operations

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Steampipe logo

Steampipe

Developer Tools

Query cloud APIs, SaaS tools and code with SQL, with no extract or load step

From
Free
Free plan
Yes

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Site24x7 website and infrastructure monitoring are sold as separate plan tracks; the entry Web Uptime plan ($9/month annual) covers only 25 websites and does not include server monitoring, which requires a separate Lite infrastructure plan; Steampipe aGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Site24x7 and Steampipe actually diverge.

Attributes where Site24x7 and Steampipe differ
AttributeSite24x7Steampipe
Pricing modelsubscriptionOpen source, with paid hosting through Turbot Pipes
PlatformsWebmacOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web
CategoryTechnologyDeveloper Tools

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Site24x7

Nothing recorded that Steampipe does not also cover.

Only in Steampipe

  • SQL over live APIs
  • Wide plugin set
  • Embedded Postgres
  • Compliance benchmarks
  • Joins across providers
  • Hosted option

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Site24x7

  • Monitoring uptime and performance from worldwide locationsnot Steampipe
  • Tracking real user performance for each page visitnot Steampipe
  • Monitoring servers across AWS, Azure, GCP environmentsnot Steampipe
  • Identifying code-level bottlenecks through distributed tracingnot Steampipe
  • Detecting anomalies and root causes before impacting usersnot Steampipe

Steampipe

  • Security teams answering posture questions against live cloud accounts rather than a nightly exportnot Site24x7
  • Compliance evidence gathering where the answer must reflect the account at the moment it is askednot Site24x7
  • Inventory and drift questions spanning several cloud providers in one querynot Site24x7
  • Engineers who would rather write SQL than learn each provider command line toolnot Site24x7

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Site24x7

  • Website and infrastructure monitoring are sold as separate plan tracks; the entry Web Uptime plan ($9/month annual) covers only 25 websites and does not include server monitoring, which requires a separate Lite infrastructure plan
  • Entry infrastructure Lite plan covers only 2 servers and 25 child resources before requiring an upgrade to Professional
  • The discounted monthly-equivalent prices shown (e.g. $9/month for Web Uptime) require annual prepayment; standard monthly billing is priced higher (e.g. $10/month)
  • Enterprise tier pricing starts at $625/month and Enterprise Plus Web at $899/month, both paid annually

Steampipe

  • AGPL-3.0 across all four engines is a procurement blocker at organisations that ban the licence outright, and the network clause reaches any internal portal or service that puts a web interface in front of it.
  • Dashboards, benchmarks and mods were removed from Steampipe entirely at version 1.0 in October 2024 and now live in a separate product, so pre-2024 documentation and tutorials describe commands that no longer exist.
  • Live querying is bound by cloud provider API rate limits and keeps no persistent store by default, which is why a separate DuckDB-backed product exists for log volumes and why large accounts return slowly.
  • The company is fifteen people and bootstrapped, maintaining four command line tools plus a hosted service plus two further products, and the newer tools have thin community traction relative to that surface area.
  • Hosted tiers include only three users regardless of tier, with additional Enterprise users charged separately, so a team of thirty costs an order of magnitude more than the headline figure before compute and storage are counted.

Pricing, plan by plan

Site24x7

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Monitor uptime of up to 50 resources
    • Instant downtime email alerts
  • Web Uptime$9/month
    • 25 websites included
    • Annual billing
  • Web Perf$36/month
    • 40 websites
    • 8 transaction monitors
    • Annual billing
  • Enterprise Plus Web$899/month
    • 2,500 websites
    • Enterprise features

Steampipe

Free
  • Steampipe CLIFree
    • AGPL-3.0
    • All plugins
    • No user or query limits
  • Pipes DeveloperFree
    • One user
    • 400 compute minutes
    • 3GB storage
  • Pipes Team$49/month
    • Three users
    • 2,000 compute minutes
    • 20GB storage
  • Pipes Enterprise$249/month
    • Three users
    • 10,000 compute minutes
    • 100GB storage

Which should you pick?

Choose Site24x7 if

  • You want to start without paying.

Choose Steampipe if

  • You need sql over live apis.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
  • You also want wide plugin set.

Questions people ask

Is Site24x7 or Steampipe better?
Neither clearly leads. Site24x7 starts at Free and Steampipe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Site24x7 or Steampipe?
Site24x7 starts at Free and Steampipe at Free.
Does Site24x7 or Steampipe run on more platforms?
Site24x7 runs on Web. Steampipe runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker, Web.
Can I use Site24x7 for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Site24x7 best used for?
Site24x7 is most often used for monitoring uptime and performance from worldwide locations, tracking real user performance for each page visit, monitoring servers across aws, azure, gcp environments, identifying code-level bottlenecks through distributed tracing. Of those, monitoring uptime and performance from worldwide locations and tracking real user performance for each page visit are not what Steampipe is typically brought in for.
What can Site24x7 do that Steampipe cannot?
Steampipe covers SQL over live APIs, Wide plugin set, Embedded Postgres, Compliance benchmarks.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Site24x7: How much does Site24x7 cost?

Site24x7 pricing starts at $9 per month for web monitoring (25 websites) with annual billing, or $10 per month with monthly billing. Enterprise plans scale to $899 per month for website monitoring and $625 per month for infrastructure monitoring.

Source
Steampipe: When did Steampipe become AGPL?

May 2021, about four months after the project went public. It is a settled licence rather than a recent change, and predates the Business Source Licence wave it is often confused with.

Site24x7: Does Site24x7 offer a free tier?

Yes, Site24x7 offers a free forever plan allowing users to monitor the uptime of up to 50 resources with instant downtime email alerts. Higher plans provide monitoring for hundreds or thousands of resources with advanced features.

Source
Steampipe: Where did the dashboards and benchmarks go?

Into Powerpipe. They were deprecated in March 2024 and removed from Steampipe at version 1.0 in October 2024, so the check, dashboard, mod and variable commands are gone.

Site24x7: What add-ons are available for Site24x7?

Site24x7 offers modular add-ons including uptime monitors ($18-$140/month), log ingestion ($3-$12 per 10GB monthly), RUM page views ($25-$300/month), and cloud monitoring (starting at $1/resource/month). Pricing varies based on usage and plan tier.

Source
Steampipe: Is it fast on a large cloud estate?

Not always. Queries call provider APIs at request time, so rate limits rather than query planning set the pace, and there is no persistent store by default.

Steampipe: Does the AGPL affect internal use?

Running it internally for your own analysis is fine. Putting a web interface in front of it that other people use is where the network clause becomes a question for your legal team.

Steampipe: Is a bootstrapped vendor a risk?

It cuts both ways. There is no investor pressure toward a licence change or an exit, and there are also fifteen people supporting a large product surface.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads